
SHSBC-306  ren 335 11 Sep 63 Service Facs and GPMs

SERVICE FACS AND GPMs

[Based on the clearsound version only.]

A lecture given on 11 September 1963


Well, what's - what's this today? 

Audience: 11th of September.

I didn't mean that, thank you for the date, but - yeah, just
taking a look at you, I supervise a lot of your cases, more
than you think. And every once in a while, why, with a
horrible shudder vou realize I've been looking over your
shoulder but - I always take a look at you, my perceptivity
on a pc is pretty good, I know how you're getting along. And 
as auditors, same way, I know how you're getting along,
see - it's very easy. How caved in does your pc look. So you
see, if you have a dominant number of the class caved in,
why the auditors aren't doing so good. Now, what's the date?

Audience: September the 11th.

Eleven September, AD 13, Saint Hill Special Briefing
Course. And this lecture slightly exceeds its normal scope
of lectures.

Have a lot of bad news for you - a lot of good news for you,
a lot of bad news. And on May the 8th, The Nature of the
GPM says that the early GPMs contacted on the pc are
implants and it says, down there its tenth, twelfth
paragraph something like that - this does not mean that the
pc's own GPMs do not exist. Do you remember that? 

Audience: Yes.

The pc's own GPM has the power and velocity, over an
implant GPM, of somewhere between a thousand or a hundred
thousand to one. Actually, a much greater figure of
magnitude. I just threw that in, just to give you an idea
that there's magnitude difference, see. Now hold your hats.
The whole of the implanted GPMs: between-lives area,
screens, implant GPMs, the Minion goals, the Helatrobus
Implants and the Train goals - all this sort of stuff, all
those GPMs, all those implant GPMs - are one RI in one of my
GPMs. 

Audience: Hmmm. Wow. Whew! 

Interesting, huh? One RI.

One RI. The name of the RI is "goals" - "oppterm goals."
Which is one of something on the order of a hundred RI
personal GPM, which extends from trillions-thirty, to
trillions-twenty on the time track. But which is actually
still going.

Now several things are - need clarifying. A lot of you have
been protesting, this - you wonder why this is part of the
service fac - well, you'll get around to that in a
minute - but several things need clarifying. And one is
the length of the time track. And a lot of you have had
considerable protest on the subject of the length of the
time track. Because trillions of trillions of trillions of
trillions of trillions of years, you know, T-T-T-T-T-T-T-
T-T-T-T, you know and, "Ohhh, my God, ho-ho-ho! Ohhh, ho-ho 
dear! Getting so long. Da-dsa-dya-dya-dya - ohhh! Uhhhh!" 
You hear that around every once in a while. You probably 
felt like that yourself, you know.

Well, I just have good news for you in that particular
department. What I would choose to call "modern times"
extends from trillions-thirteen till now. That's modern
times. The stuff that's more likely to influence the
preclear in present time.

Well, this is very germane. Because you now have your paws
on Scientology III, just about the handsomest little
package of stuff you ever had anything to do with, called a
service facsimile. First introduced as Routine 3SC.
Correct? 

Audience: Mmm. Yes.

What you're doing is fooling around with the pc's current
RI in his existing goal line of his current truncated goal.
And you're fooling around with one little RI, see. And
you've got this, and it's in present time and of course
there's an opposition to it. And you can get your hands on
the opposition, and you can get your hands on the RI and
you can fumble and fool around with this, and almost any
way you look in it, or almost any way you carve on the
edges of it you're going to make a Clear. Well, what are
you doing? You're actually clearing a dumbbell pair of the
pc's own GPM out of sequence on the track, see. That's all
you're doing.

You've got your paws on what he is doing right now. Well,
of course in fumbling around it'd be very easy for some of
you to lay your paws on what he was doing last night. Oh,
take or minus trillions-five years ago, see. "Last night,"
you know, what he was doing. You're liable to get your paws
on that. See, but that's still all right. But of course the
pc's goal is going to fall out of this thing, with a thud,
like Ann's did last night. Listed goals and one rocket
read, and so forth. Wasn't listing goals, listing ideas on
the service fac, you see. And one of them rocket read.

Well, it's the greatest probability that while you're
looking for the service fac, that which rocket reads is the
pc's own goal. So. Now, at this point you should however be
very wary, as I told you in the last lecture. I've been
aware of this, I've been holding out on you for a couple of
days here, I've been aware of this. But I didn't believe
it. I really didn't believe it very hard. And I had to do
some more looking at the thing. That is to say, I just
didn't believe the magnitude differences. I've been looking
for enough - if you are a powerful character... Let's put it
this way, if you are a powerful character that once had
muscles, and played billiards with planets, and we've got
to look for some order of aberration to reduce that power
that's comparable to that power, right? The degree of
aberration necessary to reduce that much power must be
comparable to the power reduced. And we have there a law 
or a rule. Do you see that? 

Audience: Mm-hm. Yes.

You don't take - you don't take - you don't take Big John
from the north woods, you know, that was customarily
picking up Douglas firs a hundred and seventy-five feet
tall and picking his teeth with them, you know, the Paul
Bunyan type legends, you see - and drop a tack hammer on his
toe and have him crippled for life. You see? That just
doesn't happen. No, I'm afraid you would have to have - you
would have to have quite a few forests fall on his
head, see, for him to get a headache. Well, the forests
that have fallen on the head of the thetan of course, are
these GPMs.

Now, we look it over, and so they put you on a monocycle,
and you went pocka-ting down between a couple of rows of
things that spat at you, see, and great. Great day, fine,
all right, all right. I don't even care if I key you in,
because what am I keying in? You can always scratch a
mosquito bite, see. If you went down the line with these
things barking and firing at you and that sort of thing and
they said that you were absolutably no good and that sort
of thing. Bull! The only thing they did was get you very
confused as to which was your goal and which was their
goal. And that little tiny GPM that they installed had the
power of being installed backwards, and being installed
according to the actual pattern of GPMs, had the power of
getting a thetan confused. So he didn't want to really look
over that; he didn't want to have too much to do with that.

You see why? It's backwards, you know, they implanted them
from the top to the bottom. Well an actual GPM is run from
the bottom to the top, the way it was lived. See, you don't
run an actual GPM from its top oppterm down to the goal at
the bottom. You take the goal at the bottom and you list it
back up to the top oppterm, you got that? Otherwise it
doesn't make any sense at all. They will list backwards,
but you'll find yourself being thrust forward in time and
it's hard to do.

The liability of reaching the goal is of course the goal is
the furthest item from present time, being the bottom
terminal, and when you get your pc to reach down for that
goal, this is what I wanted to give you, as just a little
tip. I didn't want you getting too adventurous here.
Because when you have the pc reach for that goal and
examine that goal, he actually is to some slight degree
moving through time between that goal and present time,
don't you see. And he lives up the whole track. And the
wild part of it is it looks just like - well, I don't know
if any of you have ever looked down the Helatrobus
Implants, and just looked down between the row and it was
all nice. It was all clean, you know, you could see all the
stuff, and you looked down to the end and you say "I wonder
what that item was, or that one." What happened, see? You
got a sort of a tunnel of blackness occurs the whole way
along, if you had some sensation of that particular character.

Well, that's what happens when you reach down the GPM.
Well, the same thing happens when you make a pc reach down
his GPM channel. Only this is something of the order of you
can reach down a GPM in the Helatrobus Implants, you
see - and the pc manages it - it isn't so good. He doesn't
like that, he didn't think that was so good. I mean, that's
his - that would be his ordinary reaction, don't you see.
But he looks down his own goal channel like this, and
scrapes up and down his own goal channel, and mucks around
in it any length of time, reaching back to the goal and
reaching something else, and so forth. And it's something
like having your head shot off with a sixteen-inch cannon,
see, because the residual charge is - oh, I'd - it'd be
almost impossible to state the difference of magnitude. The
charge is great. I'm not trying to scare your own GPMs, but
I'm just giving you an idea as auditors.

Now, let's say, let's say, that somebody has a goal "to be
sexual" or "have sex" or something like this, you see, or
"to create," "create my own universe" or something like
this, see. Let's say that's the pc's own goal, see. And
you're clobbing along here with a service fac, see. You're
looking at a service fac, and he lists it. It's "to have my
own universe" or something like this. You take this up and 
you put it in red, with a great big square around it on the 
auditor's report. You understand? So it's big. So that nobody 
can miss it while they're going through folders and that sort 
of thing. You put it up there because that's very important. 
It's infinitely more important than any implant goal, see. 
Put it up there so it's big. And then don't start mucking 
about with it. On any process except 3M2.

Oh, you can list it and get its oppterms and oppterm that,
and so forth. You've got all the technology; it'll be back
on your checksheets tomorrow morning. But, you get the - all
the technology exists for this stuff, you see. Well, what
if you used that "to have my own universe" as the service
facsimile? Ho-ho-ho-ho! You're running something back at
maybe trillions twenty-one. You're not running a service
facsimile. You're making the guy look down this channel,
see? Because that the goal, clean statement of, you see, is
the first RI in the GPM. No pardon me, pardon me, it isn't.
There is an - probably an earlier one, which would be
something like "a being with the idea that 'to have my own
universe.' " "The being with the idea to have my own
universe" may come previously to that, don't you see.
Because he hasn't become the postulate yet.

But nevertheless, you've got something that's down there at
the beginning of this track. See, and there's at least a
hundred RIs between where you are and it. At least a
hundred RI's and you go charging down there to run this as a
service fac and yeah, it'll make a lot of sense and, yeah,
you'll get a free needle, yeah, you'll get some tone arm
action, yeah, there's nothing like that. But sooner or
later somewhere along this line the pc's scuffing back and
forth, commuting you see, he's gonna rough up the rest of
his track. And oddly enough, it lies in a channel, which
looks not unlike one of these implant goal channels. Of
course there aren't any firing mechanisms or anything like
that but that's all arranged.

A pc's own GPM looks like a black island. I've already
given a lecture on this and described all these and so
forth, a long time ago - spring I guess it was. And - but
they - they look like a black island floating and so on, and
they're quite meaty. And they have specific, distinct sizes
and all of this sort of thing. Well, you get the pc
scruffing back and forth, recognize that you're running him
from the bottom of an island of solid mass maybe three-feet
thick by seventy-five feet long, by maybe thirty-feet wide,
and you're just running him up through the middle of this
thing, you know and you're running him back through the
middle of the other and you're running him back up there
again and uhhh! Hey, hey! And all of a sudden no tone arm
action, nothing else. You won't be able to continue your
activities with a service facsimile. You see that?

Fortunately, not all is lost. All you would have to do in
this particular regard is just break out your little pencil
and a hundred and seventy-five reams of paper, and go to
work with 3M2 - with all of its various complicated laws and
that sort of thing, taking the first item you found down at
the bottom of it such as the goal and working on through.
And working out the GPM.

In actual fact the beauty - the beauty of the pc's own GPM
as compared to an implant GPM is the pc's own GPM
disintegrates. And the pattern of the needle action, you
get quite a bit of tone arm action. When you start in, it's
kind of stiffish, and then the needle starts getting freer
and the tone arm starts waving more. And as you get down
about three-quarters of the way toward the top of the thing, 
just as it's given on your early plots, those early plots, 
"to scream" and that sort of thing, they're all quite valid, 
you see. They're your own GPM patterns, you see. That's the 
way they look foreshortened, but nevertheless those releases 
are all quite accurate.

And you get up - you get up about three-quarters of the way,
and you all of a sudden start seeing that thing start
rocket reading blowdowns. Rocket reading blowdowns. Psssww
Psssww Psssww Psssww! Then you start watching this tone arm 
come on down here toward Clear read, pssww-pssww! and it'll
just go on that way - it'll go on and it'll go on and it'll 
go on. Then you find another RI, you see. And then it starts 
going some more and it starts blowing down. And this thing 
practically disintegrates. You've got an automatic 
disintegration, is what happens.

Sometimes your pc'll sit there in session; he'll look at
one of these huge islands, which has been black and is now
turned grey and it'll be buckling and quivering and
buckling - no, that's the wrong word. It's shaking.
Something begins to buckle, you've got something on top of
it. But you'll see it shaking and shivering and fraying. It
looks like - it looks like some jello. It looks like a piece
of opaque jello that somebody has left in the sun. It
ceases to be so hard and fast, and it sort of drips away
and it shatters.

Well, actually that charge isn't going through your meter
or through the pc, fortunately. You're only getting a small
indication of the amount of charge going off. I don't know
how much charge is going off one of these things, but I
should think an early track GPM is probably losing a
megatron or something like that. I'd say, at least. But
it's simply disintegrating into the never-never land and
you don't notice it. But you do see it on this meter. And
the pc is fended off from the thing, don't you see - he's - 
it's over there, it's over there, maybe eight, ten, fifteen 
feet away from him. And it's going apart rather quietly. 
But it's that much force that is dissipating. And you just 
get a kickback on the meter which is almost telepathic in 
its lightness. See, there's hardly any kickback coming at 
the pc. You understand?

Well, there's enough charge to make Paul Bunyan into a
punk, see. See, there's enough charge to take a guy with
the total capabilities of an OT and reduce him down to
somebody that when the medico trims his fingernail or
something like that, he has an awful time. You get the
idea? See, there's enough charge to aberrate. Aberration
must be equivalent to the amount of power aberrated. And
it's the pc's own GPMs.

Now, there's various - various data extant in this
particular field. It's covered under the techniques called
R3M and R3M2 - was its final consolidation.  That technology
all exists.  Now, what you - what this lecture's principally
about; the technology all exists, the lectures exist, and
so forth, pc has his own goals, his own GPMs, and these RIs
have a tremendous amount of mass. One RI, you see, is maybe
a hundredth or a two-hundredth of a big GPM, see. And this
reliable item is the pc's own reliable item, is floating
round here in present time. In fact he's busy, busy, busy,
busy, busy, the nut, making himself, making himself an RI
and it has an opposition. He's busy, busy, busy, busy,
busy. See.

Now, it has a central postulate of its own and it's
dependent on the goal, also. In other words, all these
RIs - oppterms or terminals - have in common the goal. They
all have the goal in them. Because they're part and parcel
of the goal. But they have their own significance with
regard to the goal.

Let"s take the goal, let's imagine there is such a goal,
"to go to school. Such a goal would never exist, so we just
take it so it's non-restimulative. All right. Well, you've
got an RI up toward present time - got an RI up toward
present time, that'll make you very, very upset, you see?
Because it apparently won't have anything to do with
anything. And you don't understand it really until you get
the goal. But the confounded thing is baffling to auditor
and pc alike. Because it's to - "to ring bells" or "to ring
the bell" or something like this, you see. What the hell?
What does it go up to? The guy wanted to be a fire engine
laddie or what's he want to be, you know? I mean, what is
this thing? What is this thing? A service fac "to ring the
bell," see. It nevertheless will run because it's part and
parcel of "to go to school." Naturally, why, in small
schools, why, the better pupil was called on to ring the
bell in the morning and that's - see, there he is, you see.

You might find something, "to get a gold star" and you
think of gold star mothers and that sort of thing, and it's
some confounded innocuous thing like, you know, "to get A."
Or you're liable to get an oppterm of "people who bring
their lunches." Creak your brains, you know? How in the
name of common sense is this an aberrative factor in
anybody's case, you know? Well, you don't have the GPM
goal, so of course the RI all by itself doesn't make much
sense. But it's hanging out everyplace and you can come
around the perimeter of it and you can take your techniques
which are given in R3SC, and they'll land you somewhere in
the perimeter of the oppterm or terminal of the pc's own
GPM as it applies more or less to PT or some old one that's
in restimulation in PT, and will be the source of his
present time restimulation as per the graph I gave you
yesterday.

And of course you can knock that thing in the head and get
yourself a lot of nice tone arm action - wonderful tone arm
action - particularly because it's in formation, don't you
see? It's an RI in formation. And you can knock it all to
pieces and you can pull its central postulate, and so
forth, and you get all kinds of interesting meter phenomena
and all that sort of thing. But when you try to make it
make sense, it very often doesn't. And it may not make
sense, it may clear the pc up very nicely, but make no
sense at all until someday he's run on R3M and we find out
this bing to ring - "to ring the bells," is the goal "to go
to school." And he'll let out a war whoop in the session
and suddenly add it all up, don't you see. Well, the GPM
will be somewhat disintegrated already. You've already
tackled this thing obliquely. So that's actually what
you're auditing. I thought you might like to know.

Now, well, you've got tremendous complexities enter into
this situation. I hit one last night. I might as well tell
you about. Now, you actually can assess for a service
facsimile without a meter, on this basis only: Write a list
until the pc seems easy and - thinks it's complete and then
just look on the list for the one that makes the least
sense. And you should know that as an auditor because it'll
help you a great deal. You don't have too much to do with
significance on this sort of thing. But it's the one that
makes the least sense. It's a lie, it isn't true, and so forth.

And we had a list going last night; I was being audited and
one appeared on the list, "abandon all help," as a solution
to anything that was gone. Now, you add that up, I
couldn't! But it tore a somatic off of my jaw the like of
which I haven't felt in a long time, you see. And the
auditor went on another column of listing and nulling and
so forth, and it went in and it went out, because it was
being suppressed. It was worrying me, see. Not necessarily
because it wasn't sensible - but because it wasn't sensible
I suppressed it and it stopped reading. So another one or
two which were only locks on it, started reading. They read
momentarily, you see, because I'd abandoned it. They were
reading by the bypassed charge on it.

That's an interesting solution, isn't it? "Abandon all
help," if something is gone, you abandon all help. Well, it
didn't make any sense at all to me, but I happened to know
what GPM that it's coming from, it's the GPM "to be free."
And it's simply an RI and it becomes completely sensible.
One of the ways of being free is to abandon all help. See?
Perfect method of becoming free. If you need no help from
anyplace, why, naturally, you can be free. So you see, it
makes sense in its own GPM but doesn't make any kind of
sense at all. And yet, would audit - yet would audit very
nicely. Pc cognited on it all over the place, and
straightened it all out, and free up the needle and free up
the tone arm and everything go along fine, even though it
didn't make any sense. And wasn't compared to the goal,
don't you see? Because the RI that it was being listed
against was not the right RI, probably. But it just popped
up because it's a PT solution, see, of the GPM line, so
therefore it's an RI of the GPM line "to be free." Method
of being free - abandon all help.

Well, that wasn't actually an RI. I don't even know what RI
it is out of, but it's the central postulate of the RI. See
what I mean? And what you're handling is the central
postulate of the RI when you're handling a service
facsimile, so you get a disintegration. I see I've left you
adrift, here. You thought the central idea of an RI made
the RI. Well, that's perfectly valid. But it all too often
simply describes what makes the central postulate. See, we
know a little bit more now about the RI.

Let's take - let's take the RI "a lame man." See, we've
never really gone into the anatomy of a reliable item of a
GPM, because we were dealing so many months now with these
confounded implant GPMs and that sort of thing, I never
bothered to go forward on the thing. Well, what makes this
"lame man" RI hold together? Why does he assume the
identity of a lame man? See? Well, he assumes it because
it's got a solution in the middle of it, which is an id'ee
fixe, which then prevents him from looking at anything
else, and it may be "lameness." See, although the item is
"a lame man," the postulate which brings that into action,
you see, is "lameness." Do you see that it's not quite safe.

Now sometimes they are more distant than that. You see?
"Not walking," let us say, is the principal idea. And you
get that perfectly validly as "a lame man," don't you see?
Or "an immobilized person." You've got that as an RI. Now
that characterizes simply the identity of the RI. That is
the beingness of the RI. What is the thinkingness of this
RI? The thinkingness of the RI might be different. Not
always, because sometimes the RI comes up as its own
thinkingness, don't you see. But particularly a beingness
RI, or some conditional RI, may have at its core an idea.
And it's this idea which is an automatic solution. Well, an
RI always has an idea at its core. But sometimes it's a new 
idea which makes the RI, don't you see? And that whole mass 
come together, is a GPM. So you have this huge mass, huge 
block of energy with its separate items and so forth in it - 
it's hardly distinguishable as separate items because it's 
all squashed together, there's been so much attack and so 
little inspection. And this whole GPM is dominated by one 
idea - let us say, "to go to school," see. That's one idea. 
And that is common to every RI or identity in that, see, 
which is what accumulates it. But that idea all by itself 
is no inspection. Solve all problems, "to go to school," 
see. See, if you have a headache, go to school, you see. 
If you have something of the sort and if you didn't know 
something, go to school, and so forth. You get the idea, 
see?

It's totally uninspected. Totally uninspected solution. So
because it's uninspected and automatic and fixed, it then
generates into it this second step of identities which have
this as a central idea, but the identities already have
their own characteristics. See, they've got this idea is
dominant, see, but their characteristics of the identity
would be something like way up at the line, up here some
place, you know, a terminal, after he's no longer able to
carry out the postulate, becomes something on the order of
"an idiot child," see. And you go into the basis of an
idiot child to find out what it is, is "people like
unintelligence," see? Or, just "unintelligence" seems to
solve everything. So the central idea of this RI, "an idiot
child," may be "unintelligence." But the RI is "an idiot
child" and the reason it could get formed in the first
place is he already had the id'ee fixe of the goal.

So you've got actually three ideas in connection with this
thing. One is the GPM's central goal - which is the first
postulate of that GPM - plus the central idea of the RI,
which in itself, in its peculiar way forbids inspection,
and the resultant mass, caused by the goal noninspection
and the RI central idea noninspection, we have as an
identity or an individuality. We have this as the third
step. So we would say, the goal, "to go to school," central
idea, "unintelligence," results in the RI, see, "an idiot
child." Do you see that? Well, that's characteristic of
all - of all RIs. And that is the anatomy of an RI and it
also happens to be the anatomy of what you've got as a
service facsimile.

That which is not inspected tends to persist. And that is
your basic rule, this little Hobson-Jobson on one of our
earlier ones, "that which is not admired tends to persist,"
And your little rule there - that which is not inspected
tends to persist. Why? Because it's never as-ised. That
which you look at will tend to - and inspect, tends to 
become - well, it doesn't tend to remain in an aberrated 
state, don't you see? But that which is never inspected, 
of course, has this factor of uninspection which adds mass.

Now, because it is - not just because I just used
this - because it is actually quite unintelligent. What
happens? Well, a person gets hell knocked out of him,
that's what happens. And he can never attack the right
enemy. He's got some idea, you see, an idiot child is
liable to attack bright kids, see. Something like that.
Well, anything that's characterized as "bright kids," he
attacks, see. So, it's a perfect invitation to attack. And
because there's constant attack and constant overts going
on and constant withholds going on and constant battle
going on, it of course accumulates an awful lot of mass.
And there's where the mass comes from of an RI.

It's quite interesting that an idea is most easily
substituted for a thetan. You - an idea doesn't have any
mass connected with it basically, and it appears to
be - have some wisdom in it and that sort of thing. It's
very easily substituted for a thetan. So somebody can walk
around as "the guard." See?

He isn't a thetan, he's "the guard." Got the idea? And you
probably had something to do with guards and they have
rather unintelligent activities. You say, well, "I left my
lunch on the counter in the washroom and I'd like to go in
and get it."

"Yes? Hmmm. Do you have a pass? Hmmm What department do you
work for? Hmmm. Have to call the security chief, I'm sorry.
I have a young lady out here, wants to get back into the
building. Security section." You can see it now, it goes
straight up to the president of the company, the FBI is
called in and so on. The federal government is justified
for its existence, don't you see. There's telegrams going
out in all directions and so forth, and you're standing
there, you left your lunch in the washroom, see. I mean
that was all there was to understand there. But not the
guard. He's the guard, see, and so he doesn't - it's not his
to understand anything. He's just there to be the guard. Do
you understand that? Well, that's an identity which is
substituted for a thetan, see.

Well, now similarly, any idea is liable to become a
substitute for a thetan! Because a thetan does it himself.
He has some bad luck, see. He's had some bad luck. Last
three or four mountain ranges he built, fell down. Bad
luck. Overbalanced the planet and it started going in the
other direction, you know. The poles appeared at different
places than they were supposed to, you see. So, on the idea
of planets, "never build mountains." That solves it,
doesn't it? Well now, all the confusion of the accident
which has just occurred, is now prevented from ever
occurring again by "never build mountains." And that holds
in place then, all uninspected, all of the confusion he
just got into by building three mountain ranges where he
shouldn't have built them, see. So all that confusion and
randomity is held in place, because it isn't inspected,
it's solved - "Never build mountains," see. That's it. Now,
he's got it all taped, you see.

And that's his idea. Now, if we go along and follow his
career, it's sooner or later, why we'll find him running a
society which prevents the building of mountains. Society
for the Prevention of Building of Mountains, you see. He
shifted his identity only to the point where he's the
president of it, you see. But you see, you"ve got the
substitute of an idea for the being in this particular case.

He just had this as a solution. But this solution he kept
working at, and it itself then gets battered and hammered
by the environment. The environment that has a solution in
it, you see, "never build mountains," rather tends to push
against this bloke. See, so that accumulates more mass, you
see, by reason of this thing, and then he fights back and
that accumulates more mass and then eventually he becomes
the idea "never build mountains," don't you see. And it
might appear as some different RI, but you look there and
you'll find, "never build mountains" has been substituted
for a thetan, you see?

So, that's the history of a person's lessening abilities.
See, these RIs, these substitutions, all of this sort of
thing. All of his O/Ws and various things, all get piled up
on one of these id'ees fixes. The biggest id'ee fixe that a
person can have is a goal. Biggest one. That develops into
a GPM. Not all goals develop into GPMs, but those he's got
have developed into GPMs. So here's a GPM floating there,
and finally life becomes completely unlivable, and he doesn't
want anything to do with it anymore, so he abandons all that
and gets a new goal.

If you want to see - the Helatrobus Implant people did an
interesting job of tracing the deterioration of the thetan,
but actually the Bear and Gorilla goals are a better one.
They're a better model. And those which we turned out in
the last year here - that don't have the positive items
in it, you know - those that just show you the - you know 
like "to scream." You know, those GPMs which came out? 
They're graduates up the line. Well that's what a pc's own 
GPM looks like. Because he keeps moving off of these id'ees 
fixes, abandons those and has to have a new id'ee fixe to 
solve the situation which he's just solved, but which 
wouldn't stay solved. Once you start solving things in this
peculiar,fashion, you eventually wind up with GPMs. That's
all you can say about that.

Now, you find this pc with R3SC, I'm not talking to you too
much about GPMs although they come into this naturally, and
because I'm also telling you what the score is with regard
to them. Horrible feeling of exhaustion just swept over me
in the idea of having to cover all the ground that we have
covered before on the subject of R3M, and the pc's own
goals and GPMs. And just to help you out on this, that
ground is all there. I'm talking about reevolving it. The
only part of it that needs reevolving perhaps is mostly
done - and that's how do you find the pc's own goal and how
do you separate it out from an implanted goal because they
both read the same when you first find them on the meter.
And it's much easier to find implant goals than it is own
goals, and you try to run an implant goal, as though it
were the pc's own GPM, and he doesn't have a goal under
that heading, but there's only an implant goal, and you're
running the Helatrobus Implants with the wrong items, don't
you see? This is all very involved.

But if you keep an eye very cleanly out, while you're doing
service facsimiles, why, the Helatrobus Implants and other
implants of that character didn't have the power actually
to do very much to generate the RI which you find as a
service facsimile. They might have monitored it somehow,
made the guy resentful of hockey sticks or something like
this or monocycles. He probably can't stand monocycle acts
in the local vaudeville. But what's your - what's your
application here? That you must be very alert to anything
you find that rocket reads while doing R3SC - and you must 
be very careful not to tackle it head-on as the service
facsimile. Why? Because it doesn't run well with your
service facsimile technology. You're going to run a GPM
with your service facsimile technology? I rather think not.
But you can run one RI with your service facsimile
technology. See, you can run an RI with it. You understand
what I'm talking about now, do you?

That thing that rocket reads, pssw! Every time he gave you
this solution which he's selling you as the service fac and
cogniting on, well, don't shut him down in his cognition,
but don't let him wander too much on the track either.
Because you've got your hands on something which lies
trillions multiple in the past, see. And you haven't got
anything - have anything to do with his present time. You've
got something that belongs and can only be handled in
Scientology IV.

But there are other ways of attacking this situation. Now
the beauties of R3SC is it doesn't matter which side of
this orange you start peeling. See, here's this RI that's
monitoring his present life. It doesn't matter which side
of it, it doesn't matter if you take out that little green
thing at the top or the navel at the bottom or peel off
some slabs or actually blot the oil off of it - you're going
to do something, don't you see. And next thing you know
you're going to start cutting up this RI - because it'll
chop up just like anything else. And charge is going off of
this thing madly in all directions and so forth, and he'll
eventually become very calm about it.

Now, if you leave - if you find one of these things - here's
another liability - if you find one of these things, if you
find an RI and you've got yourself a pc on whom energy is 
going: Nnwwaaam, waaaooww, waaaooww, waaaooww, rrrrr, creak, 
rrrr, brrrr, brrrr! He's left session, you see, and he's 
walked out three doors - only there's only one, you see. And 
he lays down at night in bed after the session and he'll 
fowndeh and it's started going: whooooo, wawww-whoooooo. And 
he got up and hastily turned on the light and four o'clock 
in the morning he's still sitting at his window looking out
into the street and tr-trying-not-to-to-breathe-too-deeply-
because-every-time-he-does, he goes: whoooooo, wwwwllll, 
whooooo! It's ghastly! Most ghastly sensations, you can feel 
like, you know, these suction cups they clean out WCs with, 
you know, you could feel like you're inside one of those 
things, you know, being spronged and bonged. Or inflated 
and deflated rhythmically by an air pump or something like 
this. And things go around, creak. The guy's shoulder, for 
instance, moves over into the middle of his chest. And won't 
go back. And his chin suddenly moves up, as far as he's 
concerned, looks to you to be mostly - in fact he might even 
look better! But from his point of view the chin is apparently 
at the top of the crown of his head. Just occupational hazards. 
Factually not even very dangerous. But they certainly are 
frightening! Because you've come in close to the middle of 
a GPM.

Now, your first - your next reaction from this pc, you're
entitled to know what it is. "The GPM is something else. I
mean, the RI. The thing is something else. You haven't got
the guy's service fac - it's all been a mistake. Actually,
his service fac has to do with not liking Patagonians."
That's far enough away from what he's just been in. See,
he's got himself - he's got himself a qualm. This is a
new - a new illness that occurs in Scientology, and that is
"the qualms." Q-u-a-l-m-s. And the cause of it is getting
into or into the fringes of, the service facsimile and
deciding that we have come close enough. See, he wasn't
close enough in to be pulled into the thing, but he was
close enough to be whooooo, ohhhh, nooooo, ho-ho. And he
wants to change his mind. And he'll give you another
service facsimile. So you get an invalidation of what you
found, going on almost continuously in RSSC. And you can
Q-and-A with that invalidation. You can Q-and-A with that
invalidation, just so much without restimulating the living
daylights out of the case.

The way to repair it if you restimulated the case and he's
apparently getting worse or something under R3SC - is go
back and pick up everything that has been found on the pc.
One of the first requisites is to keep good records. And
pick up everything that has been found on the pc and
guessed at as a service facsimile, and finish it off
according to the rules of the game. Just finish everything
off! Elementary.

Now, the best way to finish these things off is with
the - with the lot. You give it the lot. That's all of R3SC
steps. If you find "blackberries" and I know, you've said
it was wrong, and it wasn't an idea and it wasn't a
postulate, and actually it was an identity and it was an
item, and it just turned on a - turned on a pain, and then
didn't do much and it was abandoned and then you found - and
you found "going down," for some reason or other, and that
was just touched up lightly, but the pc couldn't see how it
made anything wrong, don't you see, so that was abandoned.
You look for another one, and then the pc went into the
qualms and you found one that had to do with "to be little"
or something of the sort, and this was awful close to it,
and you decided that - you and he both decided that must be
a GPM because it was too gruesome to be confronted. And
about the fifth or sixth one along the line, you'll have
gotten tone arm action, but you'll also have an awfully
confused pc.

But you should realize that what you're doing is picking up
a stable datum and leaving the confusion alive. And the net
result is this: The pc's memory will, (quote) tend to
deteriorate (unquote.) In other words, he'll just get foggy,
don't you see. Because you've left half or three-quarters
of the confusion, attendant upon that stable datum, still
around. You've taken the stable datum out somewhat and
you've left the confusion - but the stable datum couldn't be
all the way out or the confusion would have disappeared! So
the pc who feels confused, on R3SC, is either in the
process of having a stable datum audited out, or you've -
or some other auditor has abandoned stuff that is close in 
to the case and has left it in a confused restimulation.

The repair on it is just take everything that's been found
on the case and worked at in this particular way and simply
give it the lot - that is, all the steps of R3SC. Just give
it the whole works.

Now, let me say something here about running this, because
it's very germane, it's not out of place at all because
you're dealing with RIs. The postulate is so far downscale,
if you find the center of the RI, that postulate is so far
downscale that it is probably twenty tone arm divisions
below "hide." That's not just a hyperbolical statement,
that's probably where it is. It's an idea that's turned
into MEST - way down scale. And it runs to cognition. You
only run it to cognition, but it enters at any one of these
stages: A solution - making a good record of this - a
solution, right-wrong process, make you right, others
wrong -  domination -  survival.

It enters anyplace. Anyplace. And you run it to cognition.
Now, you say to the guy, you say to the guy, "Well, would
that make others right?" "Oh, yes, it would make others
right. It would - pardon me, make others wrong." He'd say,
"Yes, it'd make others wrong, so forth. But, hey! It'd also
make them right."

You say, well, it can't be the service facsimile, because
it didn't make others wrong and make him right, and abandon
it. Ha-ha! Wait a minute. The run was only - the run was a
twelve-second run. It ran twelve seconds to cognition
before it changed that level of that scale I just gave you.
Understand? In fact one of you poor Zed students got sent
to Siberia for doing that. The pity of it is, is the Zed
students that that happened to, you know, they didn't have
the data on what they were supposed to have disobeyed yet.
Unjust, isn't it?

Now, the upshot of this process ... Now, this is - I should
give you practically a whole lecture on just this process,
and probably will. You'll be hearing a lot more of it. But
if you consider this process here as this picture of
survive, you know, I mean that's "help own survival-hinder
the survival of others," you know, that sort of thing.
"Dominate," which is "help you escape domination" and
"achieve the domination of others." And "right-wrong." And
if that's the way you look at it, and you always enter here
at "right-wrong" and then expect it to go to "dominate" and
expect it to go to "survive" - that's only gonna happen if
you've got a first cousin to the service facsimile RI, of
the pc's present time GPM series.

In other words, you've got something that does him a lot of
good, don't you see, and he gets some automaticities on it,
and everything is going along fine. But if you've got a
real, honest-to-Pete, honest-to-goodness GPM, it doesn't go
at this level. The idea doesn't come in here at right-wrong, 
and then proceed up to dominate and then go to survive, see?

Actually, this is what the picture looks like. Much more
germane. It goes solutions... Well, let's take this at this
level. It goes solutions, dominate - pardon me, solutions, 
right-wrong, dominate, survive, dominate, right-wrong, 
solutions. Horrible, isn't it? And here of course is your 
next right-wrong and your dominate and your survive. You 
understand this? 

Female voice: Yeah.

And so, that it actually, actually just builds up into ...
You understand? It might enter here anyplace. Because it
goes on - that's your top one, let us say, here. See, that
band is okay and if it were a light perimeter idea which is
still intelligent, and if you start abandoning service
facsimiles because they're not sensible, you will only get
this light variety. Because a real service facsimile is
about as sensible as an admiral's hat on a cow, see. And so
your entrance point here, your upper entrance point would
only be in that proper, exact order, nicely, nicely,
nicely - if the idea were still intelligent or still
knowable or still sensible.

Ah, but the GPM does not look very sensible and when it's a
rather weird solution of some kind or another as it would
be if it were the center of the RI, it's liable to enter in
almost anyplace down here. So, what's the net result of
this? You find this thing, "to kiss cows," you see, or
something like that or "cows are kissable" or something of
this sort and it's on a list - it's on a list of "how to
repair motor vehicles." "How would you go about repairing  
..?" "What's a safe solution to motor vehicles?" And we
get "cows are kissable." Well now, if we were psychologists, 
we would of course throw that one out because it doesn't 
fit the rest of the data. But that's what's wrong with it, 
it doesn't fit the rest of the data. It's the service 
facsimile.

Now, "cows are kissable," the pc may sit there for a little
while and say "Right-wrong, eh? Wouldn't make anybody
right. Wouldn't make - wouldn't make anybody right or wrong."

"Well," you say, "Well, all right, then, let's just abandon
it." Or "Let's just prepcheck it."

Oh, no, no, the only thing he's done here is give you this
scale. And you say, "Well, how does it fit in with
domination? Do anything with domination? Do anything with
survival? Is it just a solution?"

"Oh, survival! Well, of course! It's total survival.
There's no question about its being survival. That's it."

Oddly enough, he's answered the question and cognited in
that one sentence. And he's simply said, "It is." Which of
course is a cognition, because it's a recognition. It is
survival, see. And you say, "Well, how are we going to run
a process on this, you know. We're auditors so we've got to
run processes." Well, the way you run a process is try to
find out what level you can run a process on and not cut
the pc's itsa line while you're doing it. Because you then
spring back to him - you spring back to him, "Well, has this
been a solution?"

"Oh, yes, solutions, oh my God. It's a solution. All I've
ever done is just solve this, solve that, solve the other
thing and so on, and so on, and when I was getting
prepschool and so on and solved that solution and so forth.
And I always use this solution and so forth, when I have to
do - when it has to do with buying peanuts. Every time I buy
peanuts I use this solution. Of course, it's just been a
solution and so on - it's been a solution, been a solution,
been a solution - it's been a solution, it's been a
solution, it's been a solution." It's half an hour later,
you see. "It's been a solution." And he says, "You know, I
don't think it's... I've just taken a look at this, and
I - I really don't think it's the best solution in the world
to buying peanuts. It isn't quite applicable." Cognition, see.


All right, now let's shift it. Now, let's shift it. And we
say, "Well, how would it - how would it make you right?" Or
"How has it made you right?" "Oh, I've used it quite a bit.
It - it does. It - it makes me right. That's why I use it. It
makes me right."

That was the cognition. That's the end of that process. All
right, "How would it make others wrong?"

"Oh, well, now that's another thing. It really, it's kind
of hard to re - realize, maybe, but it makes others wrong
and it - so on and so on and so on and so on and so on..."
and fifteen minutes later, why, "... and so on. It also
makes me wrong. I didn't really realize that, but it also
makes me wrong, somewhat."

That's your cognition. All right, you say, "How would it
help you dominate others?" "It wouldn't." "Well, how would
it help you escape domination?" "Wouldn't." "All right,
well, how would it help you survive?" "Oh, well, that's
something else."

Twelve minutes later you have now found out, cognition,
see, of some kind or another. Like, "It helps everybody
survive. That's why I picked it up, you see, it helps
everybody survive."

You're back there chipping it apart, you see. "Well, how
would it hinder the survival of others?" "Well, it
wouldn't." "Well, when have you used it as a solution?"

"Well, I've been damn fool enough to use it for a solution
for a long time. But I answered that question a while ago,
didn't you hear me?" You've had it. What'd you stick your
foot in that for?

"All right, let's check this over now. Let's check this
over now, let's check it  on  the  meter.  'Survival?' 
'Domination?'  'Right-wrong?'  And  'Solution?'
'Wrong' still reads. How would it make wrong?"

"Oh, well, yeah, I - I've been kind of withholding that,
there's some other ways this works, that makes a lot of
other people wrong, don't you see. If they had it, it would
really make them wrong, if they had an idea like that."
"All right, that's fine. That's fine. Very good. All right,
how is this thing going now?"

Well, you've put in a little whatsit line there and he
tells you all about it, and so forth, and you uncork your
Prepcheck. And you just give him an eighteen-button
Prepcheck on the subject, and your tone arm action
somewhere along that line starts to die down. Gives you a
little bit more yip-yap about it and that is it. That is
the end of it. Do you see how that's run?

Unfortunately - unfortunately, the auditor is always in the
liability of hitting the GPM. And as long as this technique
is around, you're going to have auditors grab "to go to
school" and run with the ball and have a pc not going Clear
on the service fac and get all chopped into something
that's only resolvable with 3M2. And why? Well, actually
they didn't pick up this pc's service fac, they got the
pc's goal. This is counterbalanced by the fact that if you
got the pc's goal you're rich, because it's very, very hard
to sort the pc's ozun goal out of the implanted GPMs - it's
because they both rocket read.

Going to - somebody's going to ask me the question, I'm
sure, "Does the pc's own goal and own RIs rocket read?" And
the answer is "Yes." In fact that is probably what makes
implant goals rocket read. They're probably rocket
reading off the top of the pc's own RIs. Secondary RR and
that's the only thing that makes them rocket read. Pc's own
goals rocket read.

Now every RI, including the one that the service fac may be
in, may rocket read. And the GPM goal that the pc is
sitting in is going to rocket read. That goal is going to
rocket read. But your GPM does not need to rocket - pardon
me - your GPM, to run it, has to rocket read, RIs to be
acceptable have to rocket read, and not turn on mass when
they do. But - just slide some 3M2 sideways in there. But
the service fac doesn't have to rocket read. You're under
no compulsion to accept a rocket reading service fac. As a
matter of fact there's some liability in doing so.

It isn't necessarily true that you should reject all rocket
reading service facs, but be perfectly calm about accepting
a service fac that just goes on a little eighth-inch tick.
Perfectly calm. You're not going to do anything to this
character, anyhow. You're just going to have him straighten
out his survival, and you're gonna loosen up the needle,
and free up the needle and you're going to get some TA motion.

Now you actually have to be pretty knuckleheaded to do R3SC
wrong, even though it has the liability of being part of
the pc's GPM and so forth. You really have to work at it to
do it wrong, and the best way to work at it is to be
completely unthorough.

Go over little things and little things and little things
and little things, and pick up this idea and throw it away,
and not put it through the grinder, you know, and get that
idea off of him and pitch it overboard and not put it
through the grinder, you see. And then knock this one out
and I mean push it into view, and pc says, well he's
cognited on it's a service fac, so you say well, we don't
have to run that then.

Because the end product will be a very confused pc.
His - you've half - see, every time you restimulate a stable
datum, which is what a service fac is - a very aberrated
stable datum - they're a sufficiently aberrated stable datum
to wonder - make you queasy about ever getting another idea
so long as you live! I know I was thinking the other day,
damn me, if I ever solved anything again I ought to kick
myself. I mean, you see how much trouble you can get into
with solutions. That fortunately is not the case, don't you
see. You can go on and live life.

But, the point - the point is that every one of those things
that are perimeter solutions on the center of a service
facsimile, which is simply the pc's current RI. If you want
to get very technical about what it is, it's his current
solution, see, monitored by the goal, see? That's all it
is. He's generating it, that's for sure! It's his solution.
And it's aberrated as you can come, because it's an
uninspected solution. He - actually, was a perfectly decent
solution when he first got ahold of it, but now it's living
his life for him, don't you see? And therefore it doesn't
take care of the environmental restimulation. Doesn't even
vaguely take care of his life for him. Doesn't write any
letters for him, it doesn't issue him any paychecks, it
doesn't box any policemen, it doesn't do anything. It just
sits there and keeps him from doing anything. Well, when
you move that thing, all the policemen he's not boxed, all
the letters he's not written, all the inspections he's not
done - start hitting him in their aggregate. So all you've
got to do is disturb it and move it slightly out of the
way, and some of this confusion starts generating. And the
pc starts feeling confused. And you'll - running R3SC you'll
have some of the most confused pcs in sessions you have
ever seen. You've got to adjust to this as an auditor.
You've got to adjust to this as an auditor.

Don't go arguing back at the pc because he says, "But you
haven't started the session yet!" And you've said "End of
session," so that the two teams on both sides of you are
going to ask that you calm down, and so forth, and the pc
just knows you never started session, that's all. Just
knows you never did. And pc is going to walk out, and then
suddenly come back and ask you to end the session, you
know? And leave his books, you see, leave his books on the
chair - leave his books on the chair and then get a taxicab
to go home for them. You watch this, see. Well, that is
simply ordinary. That would be ordinary in running R3SC.
Quite an ordinary state of mind.

Now, if that's an ordinary state of mind, what is the state
of mind of the bloke who has had five service facsimiles
picked up, partially run and thrown away, by the auditor.
Now he's got five zones and areas of confusion which are
knocking his block off. Well, man, if he can tell the time
of day, he would be very, very lucky! It's not terribly
dangerous, but it's useless to put a pc into this
particular frame of mind. It's silly.

Now, you'll find out inevitably that this happens
accidentally. Just in sorting them out, you miss one, you
miss two, you see. Something like that. You couldn't get
one to run yesterday. Something is sitting in the middle of
what you are trying to do and you can't get the pc to talk
about it, something like that. So you go on with your
assessment. And you think you've now got one for that
session. No, you've got the second one for that session,
don't you see? Pc is so confused and stony he actually
can't tell you about the one he got. See, the first one you
got. Now you're already en route to the second one, without
recognizing that you have found the first one, you
understand? So it's a very good thing to review the
auditing you've done every now and then and clean up what
you've left behind.

There's no crime in having three service facsimiles up in
the air like Indian clubs, as long as you're on the stage
to eventually catch them, you see? There's no crime in
having three in the air. The only crime is not being there
to catch them as they come down, you see. Finish them all
up in other words.

You're going to be fooled on a lot of service facs because
they're so far downscale that they don't run according to
the steps of R3SC, you have to jumble the steps, don't you
see? Well, actually you don't really change the steps, but
it just doesn't hit at this level, or hit at that level and
so the pc says it isn't and it isn't - and then you tell the
pc, "All right, well then it can't be a service fac," you
see, because it didn't enter at the level of right-wrong.
Well, this is a serious blunder, in actual fact. It'll very
often enter at the level of solutions; it'll very often
enter at the level of "domination," quite often enter at
the level of "survival," you see, when it won't enter at
any other but the level it enters in on. That's the one.
That's the entrance point.

Now that's - a real service fac behaves in a most outrageous
fashion, in that regard. And something that isn't a service
facsimile but simply gives you fine tone arm motion is more
likely to behave perfectly. You still follow the steps of
RSSC, see. You still do all those things. But, just because
the pc can't do one of the steps is no reason to abandon it
as a service fac and simply prepcheck it or something like
that. No, try to enter these other points. Try to enter
these other points, and you all of a sudden will trigger
the automaticity, on occasion, that you've been looking
for. You'll all of a sudden realize that you're running
some perimeter thing. The main thing is to get tone arm
action. That's the main thing for you to get. That's the
big thing for you to get, tone arm action.

Administratively, remember to keep your weather eye peeled
for the pc's goal, because this is the best goal finding 
method that we've had to date. The best goal finding method. 
You're actuallv unburdening the bank to the pc's goal. And 
all you do is run service facs - if you're actually hitting - 
you run service facs, until the pc's in pretty good shape, 
see, and has handed you his goal. Elementary. Means some pcs
will be on a long run, see, before they do. But if that's
the case then they should be. They should have been on a
long run.

Now, you're cutting down the environmental restimulation of
the pc, constantly and continuously as you're addressing
the service facsimile. Chronic present time problems, hidden 
standards, the other things, the very things which attract
present time problems to the pc are of course contained in
the RI of his own GPM which he is now in the process, 
laboriously, of forming, by being a blind nut. Naturally. 
He's got an RI, "a lover." That's the RI he's forming in 
this lifetime. See? On the goal "to be famous," not the 
goal "to be sexual." See, and there he is forming up this 
RI, "a lover," see. And its central postulate doesn't have 
too much to do with this, it's "to be good." That's its 
central postulate.

You find "to be good," you don't connect it with "a lover"
see, and you certainly don't connect it with "to be
famous," you see. You'd naturally say it's a sexual goal,
you see. And "to be good" is a disciplinary goal of some
kind or another, and all kinds of ramifications. And we
don't dare run "to be good;" it doesn't rocket read, but it
sounds like a goal, don't you see.

In other words, you can have a picnic walking through this
forest of spears. You can have a picnic. But of course,
that's nothing, because naturally the pc's whole bank is
booby-trapped with these GPMs that have been implanted, so
they read like goals too. That's the one you worry about.
Don't worry about doing these RSSC things, just go right
ahead and do them, get lots of tone arm action and so
forth. You'll get action, tone arm action, on the pc's own
goal line - much, much, much, much better, infinitely better
tone arm action, than you ever got on any implant GPM. And
actually this whole thing has been resolved on the basis of
looking for tone arm action. We finally come back to: Tone
arm action is best found on the pc's own GPM channel.

You can use almost anything. You can use almost anything in
the way of RIs, to do this RSSC stunt; you can do this
stunt on any GPM RI found. The best way of handling it,
however, is to oppose it with 3M2 if it's a backtrack
thing, run it as a GPM. But you're not looking for that
right now, you're trying to get down the environmental
restimulation of the pc - calm him down, cool him off, and
so on, so as to cut down the session environment
restimulation and square him away. And you best do this with
RSSC. R3SC will eventually lead in to a differentiation by
the pc and by you as the auditor, of which is and what is
the pc's own goal. When you've got that you can run 3M on
it and actually the pc will fly like a bird. You won't have
seen tone arm action the way you see tone arm action on a
real GPM.

The only thing that puts it in the shade is R3M2 - is
complicated, it is delicate to run, it is hell on the pc,
you can miss items like crazy and the fact that you're
running those GPMs over the top of falsely implanted GPM
probably makes it a picnic, the like of which we never
heard of.

So let's just quietly worry right now about R3SC and meet
the other dragon when we turn the corner of the road. Okay?

Thank you.

[end of tape.]




