6206C14 SHSpec-156  Future Technology

     When a PC takes responsibility for withholding from the auditor, he locks
himself straight into the mechanics of 3GA.  The ARC break that results from
such an action on the part of the PC is the sort on which the bank is built
and may be too heavy to be handled by ruds.  That is the button that makes 3GA
what it is.  It is based on the mechanics of taking full responsibility, in a
limited way, for one purpose.  There is no pan-determinism here.  The person
dedicates himself to the goal of the GPM as a prime postulate.  Doing anything
else is Dev-T for the PC.  This sets up a situation where everything else is
an otherness.  is a departure from all pan-determinism.  The PC has had it,
since any other action is an alter-isness of the basic purpose.  Doing
anything else is a breakdown of his own very isolated determinism.  This is
how the PC backs out of the physical universe, thereby running into it again
with a thud.  Thus other occurrences, besides those which fulfil the goal, are
not as-ised.  They are alter-ised, and mass gathers around them.

     You should realize that it is a missed withhold that louses up the
session.  What if the PC took responsibility for never getting any withholds
off?  He could make such a postulate.  You would then have an ARC break that
no rudiments could undo.  Maybe even a process couldn't undo it, since it goes
straight to the heart of the GPM and keys in all those basic purposes.  By
this action, the PC has keyed in the highest button in the bank: withholding.
Not that PC's are responsible for withholds, but they are responsible for
action of one kind or another.  So when the PC takes responsibility for the
[highest] button in the bank, wow!  If you try to run a PC on, "What
withholdingness have you taken responsibility for?", he would get more
somatics than he knew existed, because you are trying to run the GPM out from
the topside down.  It is not clear, at this time, what you could do with this
situation.  This is under investigation at this time.

     So the final question on withholds in model session is under test.  LRH
is trying to find something that could undo the possibility of the PC's having
postulated that he wasn't going to tell you anything or talk to you in that
session.  Here he has found a button in excess of all other buttons.  3GA was
designed to handle this button with ease, but not to handle the above
situation.  Probably the reason for an occluded childhood is having taken full
responsibility for not communicating, e.g.  "I'll never tell you anything
again!  I'm mad at you!"

     The likelihood of the PC's making such a postulate and hanging up the
session as part of the GPM is remote, if you are following the textbook
solution.

     Don't let untrained auditors attempt listing or 3GA.  The only danger in
listing is for some untrained, unskilled auditor to try to run 3GA.  They can
get a PC into more trouble than you can easily get him put of.  3GA solves
3GA.  If you run a 3GA wrong, you can make it right with more 3GA.  It is a
peculiarity of problems in this universe and in the mind, that a prime
solution runs out its own errors.  That is the test of a prime solution.  You
make an error with this solution, and it corrects the error, so therefore it
is not a cure.  3GA is the first thing that is not a cure.  A cure does
something about a prior problem.  3GA operates on the prime postulate.  It
wouldn't even register as a goal if it weren't a prime postulate on some
section of track, so it isn't solving anything.  But it puts the person in a
situation where he doesn't have to be solved.  Very tricky!

     The trouble with finding a wrong goal is that listing it will beef up the
bank worse than any creative process ever run.  You are running an alter-is,
and you will get an alter-is.  Mass is an alter-is, so the longer you run the
wrong goal, the more mental mass you are going to get.  If you suggest a goal
to the PC, the misownership of it will seize it up in the GPM and cause it
thereafter to read.  It will be reading on misownership. like everything else
in the GPM If you list it, the mass will increase and increase, and the PC
will feel worse and worse.

     [At this point, LRH mocks up a "World Mental Health Organization" which
would inspect hospitals, etc.  It would subscribe to the "International
Congress of Ethics in Healing", and it would require doctors to give an
account of their facilities, results, technology, credentials, etc.] The right
to inspect gives the right to command.  It is the first step in taking
control.

