

DATING

A lecture given on 17 July 1963

SHSBC-286 renumbered 315  17 Jul 63 Dating

[Clearsound version.]


Thank you.

Well, you had your demonstration last week, so I thought
I'd better give you a talk this week on the subject of
meters, and so forth. This is what? 

Audience: 17th.

Thank you! Thank you. All right, 17th of July, AD 13, Saint
Hill Special Briefing Course. The subject of this lecture
happens to be dating.

We haven't had any material on dating for some time. And
the situation is a lot grimmer than it looks, on the
subject of dating and the need for accuracy in dating.
Accuracy in dating is the single most important function of
the auditor. Period. Single most important function of the
auditor. And I'll tell you why and you might be very
intrigued with this.

Since October, last year, I've been engaged in a study of
unusual intensity. We took a new departure on the subject
of auditing when we went into Routine 3 on the subject of
goals. Took a very long time to sort that outtook a couple
of years, actually - and to find out that all of these
mental phenomena and so on come down to the time track and
engrams. Now,we had already been over this in 1950 - the
difficulties of running time track, and so on, consisted of
the number of cases, mostly, the number of cases who could
not do it. We had lots of cases who couldn't run on the
time track and run through engrams and erase engrams and
that sort of thing.

So therefore, a vast number of years were spent in
accumulating evidence and data on the subject of, well,
case improvement without running the time track, and so on.
But a great many years were spent in that and they were not
ill-spent. We have tremendous numbers of processes of one
kind or another which accomplish these things.

In October it became apparent that something else was at
work here on the subject of the time track, that the time
track - well, the time track started to swing in with
greater and greater importance right up to the time when it
was discovered that the GPM was an implant and that its
items were all implanted.

Now, at that point - at that point, whatever the date of
that was - a great decision had to be made here - a big
find-out. We had to discover whether or not an individual
could go clear and get out of the mud, again, without
running the time track and engrams. And recently I saw a
perception on the subject and it made it possible for
people to run engrams and etc., on the time track.

Now, all this boils down to is this: The problem is very
serious when you realize this one little point here.
Already had a great deal of experience of failure on
trying to run people on the time track. Great deal of
failure attends this, you see. Nineteen fifty, I never ran
into cases that couldn't run engrams up till the time I
started to teach people to audit, and that sort of thing.
And then cases started showing up that couldn't run engrams
and they amounted to a considerable percentage of the
number of cases presented themselves.

I've always gone on an "all" basis. There's no particular
reason to leave - to leave Pete behind, you see, just
because of some peculiarity that Pete has that Joe and Bill
don't have, don't you see? So therefore, you'll realize the
seriousness of the situation when I tell you that a few
weeks ago I sat down and had to consider this, this one
point: Was it possible that only about 50 percent of the
people around could be moved through to OT? I actually
had to consider this point. I'd never considered it before.
I had just gone ahead on the basis of, well, we just will
do it, don'tyou see? But I had gotten down to a point where 
I had me doubts! And I would say, since October, we have 
been through very harrying, harassing and upsetting research 
channels. These have been very rough, very rough.

And they've been made very rough by the fact that I had to
catalyze research and do it far more rapidly per unit of
time than it had been done before because of the - a review
of the situation demonstrated that we didn't have much time
left. This was quite obvious to me. We just didn't have
much time left. That was proven, by the way, in January
when the attack was made on Scientology in the United
States; and we've gone ahead on that.

But my answer to that situation was (1) hold the line
legally and impede the progress, and even win if possible,
but not go into a complete spin on the subject and just
fight that battle on that line, you see? And (2) make OTs
and get this job wrapped up in an awful hurry. You
understand? Bypass the state of Clear and move into the
state of OT. You see, Clear is a comfortable, human end
product. I must tell you why this is that way. A Clear has
no difficulty living around or society has no difficulty
accepting this state of Clear. He has no difficulty living
around human beings. You get the idea.

He's still carrying along. He simply is not aberrated in
the state he is in at the human level. You understand?

Well, OT: that is something else. That is something else.
That's probably the difference between making a playground
supervisor and a commando - if you want to go at it
militarily, see? And if - it isn't that we needed this
desperately, but it was the only possible answer for two
reasons. We had to wrap the whole thing up all the way.
There wouldn't be any comfortable margin of after we'd
wrapped up Clear nicely then go ahead and wrap up OT. See,
we didn't have that comfortable margin - had suddenly been
cost us - and we had to go straight ahead and wrap up the
problems of OT just like that.

Well, this is an awful steep hill to climb. If you listen
to lectures and read papers and that sort of thing of mine,
of ten years ago, you'll find me saying, "Well, we don't
know much about the ways to OT," and occasionally I'd
release a little process, probably an OT process, you know.
This - little comments. I'd reply to letters, "How do you
make an OT?" "Well, we'll find out in due time," you see.
It's a comfortable state of mind.

That comfortable state of mind shifted. It had to shift.
The two bases on which I was basing the future survival of
Scientology, and your personal future, was just this: We'll
hold the line legally and do all we can along that line,
but put all of our strength and action and so forth over
into the technical line. And push it forward on research 
right up to the point of Operating Thetan with no way stops 
of any kind. We'll just wipe them out. We won't talk about 
them any more particularly. We'll say - well, if somebody's 
running a goal out, we'll just call him, courteously, he's a 
one-goal Clear, see, ten-goal Clear - we don't care, see?

Now, you can apply that to R3R. You can run a chain out of
somebody - he's a one-chain Clear, see? Different kind of
Clear. You'll find out that'll hold good. But the point I'm
making here is all that got bypassed. I've had to
accelerate this up to a tremendous level.

Now, when you start accelerating research to this degree,
you're going to make problems because you've taken time out
of the places where you need time. And right away you get
lots of problems. So I had to wrap this up in a hurry. And
I believe in the last few months, the work which I've done
in the last few months, per unit of time, exceeds anything
I've ever attempted. And I've slowed down you, as far as
that's concerned. I haven't let some of you out of here,
and so forth, until I felt that there was - that you would
have something to operate with stably, and so forth. It
wasn't that I needed your case for research. It was that I
needed you out there with a fairly stable attitude of what
you were going to do, you see?

I let some go because they could run GPMs and they had an
idea of how to do this, and so forth, and they could audit
basically and they could handle meters and stuff of this
character, and so that was all right with me, knowing they
could catch up with it. Remember there were a couple of
problems that weren't solved.

And one of those problems was the most basic problem: Do we
sit still and say, "All right, some people can go to OT and
some can't?" Is that the way we handle this? - No, I'm
afraid the psychologist, the psychiatrist, the Pavlovist, 
I'm afraid they'd handle it this way, with all too much glee. 
But I didn't care to handle the problem like that. But I was 
almost beaten to my knees on this particular line because 
this horrible fact had emerged - I'd suspected it but It had 
emerged in all of its grisly visage: If you can't run the 
time track, you'll never get to OT. That's it.

Well, that's pretty grim. Now, I'd already found out that
all you had to do with R3R - which is what makes R3R
R3R - all you have to do is get the right chain, get the
right date, get the right duration and the person will have
visio and even sonic, and so forth, on the chain. Now, this
was a fabulous discovery. But I'd already made that
discovery when I'd gone into the blues on the subject and
wondered if 50 percent wouldn't be left behind anyway. So
that discovery didn't make all that difference.

You can run an engram on almost anybody if you've got the
right chain and the right date and the right duration, as
far as sonic and visio is concerned. Ah, but there was one
more impeding factor: Could you run it with tone arm action?

Now, let's go back and look this over. If an individual - if
an individual is going to make case progress - this has
already been established, you see this individual's going to
make case progress that is real to the individual, it will
be in the presence of tone arm action. Tone arm action is
the key to all of this. That's very important. He maybe can
run an engram, you understand, but if he can't run an
engram with tone arm action he's not blowing any charge and
his reality will not improve. If his reality doesn't
improve he can't go any earlier on the track. He isn't
making any case gains. No tone arm action - no case gain.

So the bug in running engrams was not just forcing people
along a certain chain where they had sonic and visio if
they had the right duration - and you'll always get it, I
don't care if the guy has a black field or anything else,
you get the right duration of something, he's got pictures.
I mean, we've got that whipped. But can he do it with tone 
arm action? There was this one other bug which I, of course, 
knew nothing about in 1950 - one other bug: Could he do it 
and blow charge or were you just going to go on endlessly
stirring up the muck?

TBD
No tone arm action - you're just going on endlessly stirring
up the muck. Oh, you can release some somatics and you can
do some various things. It doesn't look terribly grim,
except the case isn't really making any progress. You want
to know the test? You look through a case that is running
engrams, and we have some on record, and they
setting - they're setting the same goals for every
consecutive session. They never change their goals for the
session. You look at the gains. They're just lukewarm
gains. There's how you'd sniff them out, and there they go.
Watch the pc - we know this of old - who sets the same goals
every session. You get no change of goals; you get no
change of case. I don't care what you're doing with a case.
I don't care how much time track the fellow is running; and
that coordinates with no tone arm action. No tone arm
action - no change of goals. Case isn't blowing charge. No
tone arm action.

So it comes down to not does the person have sonic and
visio, but does the person have tone arm action? He must
also, of course, have sonic or visio or something, you see,
in running the engram - I give you - to improve - they nearly
always had visio. Sonic is not very vital to run an engram
with. They must be able to move through it. But if they're
moving through these engrams with no tone arm action, you
are not getting a case improvement. And that was what
caused me to sit down and say, "Well, are we going to leave
50 of - 50 percent of them behind?" No tone arm action.
Couldn't produce tone arm action. Yes, we could go back - go
back on the case to a lower level process; to reach and
withdraw, to this and that, and hope that it got enough
tone arm action and blew enough stuff off so that sooner or
later the fellow could run an engram with tone arm action,
see? Well, let me tell you something; that is just a thin
hope. You understand that? That's a thin hope. Oh, you can
improve him as a being. But that's the route to Clear, not
the route to OT You can key out a Clear this way. He'll go
free needle and everything else. It's quite interesting. We
abandoned these Keyed-Out Clears, and so forth. They
postulate themselves into the soup anywhere between one and
three, four, five years afterwards. So the devil with it.
That wasn't doing us any good. Made them feel fine, and all
that, and they'd never be so bad off again, and all this
sort of thing. But these are human goals. See? Guy now
doesn't have lumbosis. So what? Do you think - not having
lumbosis or being able to cure lumbosis is going to put you
any place into a position where the United States
government won't be able to spit on you every twenty-four
hours? Let me tell you, no.

A government that is so minded as to produce an
appropriation of sixteen billion dollars for men who can do
nothing except butcher their fellow man, is not going to be
held off with feathers. That's not going to be held off by
being good little boys and girls. You understand. That's
not the way to fight that battle. You understand? If you
say, "Well, all right, all right, other organizations have
done it." No. This world is going into a very interesting
roily coaster slide. It's going down, man. It's going fast.

The ethical level of government, these various other
factors that you see, the preponderance of weapons, the
little sense being used - look for a new solution. Look for
a new solution in international affairs. Just to give you
an idea of it - I kept an apartment up in London for some
time and I hadn't been up there for about a year. It's
closed now. But I hadn't been up there for about a year and
a man taking care of it had laid out some magazines: Time,
Life, junk like this. And I went up there - I hadn't been up
there for about a year. I'm trying to get myself in
condition, you know, to stand the smog, smoke and fire,
carbon monoxide, you know. And I got myself in condition
and went up for a visit to London.

Anyway, I sat down in this apartment and I was waiting for
somebody. I picked up a magazine to see what was going on
in the world. And I read the magazine. It was all about Red
China and about atomic conferences and Geneva, and all
this. And I said, well, same things are going on, and then
with great shock I suddenly realized I was reading a
magazine which was about eighteen months old. There
hadn't been any change in international affairs in eighteen
months - same news. I don't know why they publish new
editions.

That's an interesting thing. You're looking for new
solutions, you won't get a change in international
situation unless you get some new solutions around some
place. They're still discussing the same things. The only
new news you're getting is a few more riots, a few more
conference failures, don't you see? And when you're used to
reading the time track to predict, such as I am, you read
that kind of thing with a "Oh?" and you can draw a pretty
accurate estimate of about how long it's going to go. And
there's no new factor in the world but us.

Now, that's a very interesting, maybe a self-centered or
maybe a stupid adjudication or maybe it's this. You could
criticize it from a number of lines but it still holds
true. It still holds true and I see no slightest chance of
the Scientologist in the United States going on the way he
is going. I see no slightest chance at all unless some
other factor is entered into the situation which reverses
the tide. He'd either have to be able to get very
spectacular case results or he will be able - have to be
able to - and even that isn't good enough - produce a
spectacular being. One or the other in order for the
situation to imbalance and be resolved.

Now that's a pretty sobering estimate of the situation. And
yet it's a coldblooded estimate of the situation. It isn't
a hopeful, propaganda estimate of the situation. If I
wanted to propagandize you I certainly would be able to
do so, never doubt that. But I don't. I usually tell you
the truth. Sometimes it's very unpalatable. But as far as I
could tell, this was about the only way we could meet the
situation.

Now, all that background music I'm giving you right there
is - just shows you that we were at a serious crisis.
Because without tone arm action, even though the person
could run the track, he would never make the grade.

Well, this is pretty heroic to get it sorted down that
well. I got it sorted out to where he could run the track
with perception. And then got it sorted out to the fact
that you - if you didn't get tone arm action it didn't do
any good to run the track, even with perception. See, this
is getting more and more interesting because it's an
isolated point. Now, give this point, tone arm action, the
stress that it deserves. Without tone arm action you do not
make any case progress, period! Give that - give that the
stress that it deserves. You wake up to that and don't you
go around looking hopeful.

The reason I haven't lowered the boom on this, particularly, 
because I didn't want to throw you into the doldrums because 
I thought I'd probably lick - be able to lick the problem and 
wrap it up. And I have. So I can lower the boom on this other 
fact. And that fact is you process somebody without tone arm 
action and you might as well take him for a walk in the park! 
It'd probably be more therapeutic. See, it's that important 
to have that old tone arm waggling!

I won't go into what is tone arm action; there's a bulletin
on it. It still holds good. Good tone arm action, poor tone
arm action, no tone arm action; these things have all been
classified. That tone arm there tells you how much mass you
are discharging off the reactive bank. And when that thing
isn't wiggling, you're not discharging any mass off the
reactive bank. And that is all there is to it.

So my problem then became, and has been with me now for
many weeks, horribly - a haunting nightmare of a problem:
What is tone arm action when it's absent? Not what is tone
arm action. We know that. But what is no tone arm action?
What is no tone arm action? Now, my God, if it's assumed,
the importance of the fact that you've got to drop 50
percent of the people you process just because they don't
get tone arm action - regardless of what else they do while
running engrams - that becomes a very important question.
What is no tone arm action? Wow! And boy, if that hasn't
been a conundrum!

Well, I've been able to sort it out. I've been able to sort
it out to this degree - it's sorted out. I won't - it isn't a
modified sort-out, it has been sorted out: The tone arm
action disappears off a case to the degree that time is in
error. And there is the answer. This is very important and
this wraps up an awful lot of packages for you.

Tone arm action does not cease because you've run a wrong
goal. That's quite interesting. It'll slow down and monk-up
because you fail to run out a GPM, because of this, because
of that, because of something else. No, it doesn't cease
because of these things. Oddly enough it doesn't cease
because of ARC breaks. You may think it might cease because
of ARC breaks - only because it accidentally falls over also
into the other time consideration. ARC breaks are mostly
caused by wrong time, you see, so you could have read that
reversewise.

The old Dianetic Axiom, time is the single source of human
aberration, could have stood a lot more punch-up. I knew it
was true, but I knew a lot of other things were true.
That's the truth! You get the difference between, you know
"We know it was true." "That's the truth!" See? Time is the
single source of aberration. The GPM is totally devoted to
scrambling somebody's time. The double-firing items. So if
you can't get the GPMs off the case, if you can't get those 
particular engrams off the case, the guy will never make it. 
They are geared 100 percent to be aberrative.

By the way, they're very hard to date. And you want to know
where dating is in this, I'm going - I'm talking to you
about dating right now - time. Now, one of the things that
your pc who is - hasn't got any sonic and very little
visio - one of the reasons he can't get a rocket read, and
probably the chief one, is because he never contacts the
speed of the item or the fire. He never contacts it and so
he gets very poor rocket reads on the thing. You know how
one of those things sound? I won't use one here that is
very aberrative. Because, it'll stir you up.

Let me think of something. We'll use "spat" as the goal and
we'll use "nonsensically" as the part of it. So with
"nonsensically spat" as the RI, we actually get something like 
this: "Ppppppfffffffsssssss!! Crack! Nonsensically spat."

That's the way a GPM sounds all the way up the track. That's 
a hissing type on the earlier track from the Helatrobus. The
Helatrobus goes: Crack! Nonsensically spat. Clang! They put
a clang in after it to make you think that a pellet has hit
the other pole and you've been shot at.

A lot of you have been run on these things and didn't know
that, did you? Running them without sonic. Now how does a
pc normally react to this? How did a thetan normally react
to this - particularly the hissing type which is earlier and
more germane to a thetan  -  the "pppppffffffffffsssssssssss! 
Nonsensically spat." And he'd just go, "Geeek! Why
doesn't it get over with?" See? So part of your aberrative
factor is he's rushing it. Have you ever had a pc get very,
very, very speedy on the GPMs, you know? Speedy? You know?
Trying to get it off in a hurry? Get another one off in a
hurry? Give him four items at once! You know? Did you ever
have anybody doing this? Well, that person is just
dramatizing the natural reaction to this, man! It feels - in
the incident it felt like he was walking under water at
enormous restraint, see? And he's just going mad! Why can't
this thing get over with? Because he's a fast - he's a fast
cookie, see?

The double-firing principle of item one versus item two - 
this double firing principle again messed it all up. It
hung him up in time, don't you see, because it gave a
positive-negative charge to two opposing sentiments. It hit
him from the right and it hit him from the left. And made
him feel like he couldn't move, but that he had to move to
get out of the way of it. And he'd get into all kinds of
time scrambles. The total purpose of the GPM was to
scramble time. This is represented by the fact that they're
the hardest engrams to date. They float. They float in
time, and they're based on the problems activities I was
talking to you about. All the rationale of the GPM, as
given in early lectures on the subject, and so on, is all
valid. These things are all the laws of life. They're not
the laws of GPMs. I had to figure them out and synthesize
them, then I found out somebody else had taken a shadow of
this thing, and they'd made false ones all over the track.
And that was one of the reasons why. That was one of the
reasons why people couldn't run engrams because you can't
run through them. You have to run them out with repeater
technique, because of the opposing items. A pc cannot go
through them, just scan, scan, and that's out. Don't you
see? You scan somebody through a GPM and it all goes black.
Why does it go black? Well, he protested it all the way
through. And what you do is rekindle his protest when he
got it. And of course that turns the engram black, and then
you can't see anything in it. And then he can't move on the
track, and he's all frozen up in the thing,and so forth. So
it's remarkable that we can run these things. Now do you
get the idea?

The important truth was that time is the single source of
aberration. Now, all that is very interesting; all that's
very interesting - the GPM and its aberrative character on
time. But actually we don't care so much about its
aberrative character on time, we can neglect it because we
can resolve it. It isn't that that keeps the tone arm from
moving. We can louse one of these things up and we still - 
we still don't cure - I mean, don't stop that tone arm.

You can run a person through a wrong goal with a flock of
wrong items and still have tone arm action. It'll mess it
up a bit because he's not moving as fast, and that sort of
thing, but it won't stop it. So what is this thing called
stopped tone arm action? What is it?

All right. It is simply wrong dates. That is all it is.
Wrong time. That's all. Now, you go and forget this - that
I've just given you as a datum - and I won't wish you any
bad luck like getting on a pole trap, but you'll have a
hard time. You'll have a hard time with pcs if you forget
those two data. The two data are, of course, that a person
cannot run track successfully - even with sonic, visio and
everything else - unless he also has tone arm action, see.
Don't lay that one aside, and get that under the - don't get
that one parked, because that's a very important datum.
Terribly important, technically. No tone arm action; come
off of it, man!

I don't care how pretty it's running. Finish the cycle so
the pc won't be upset, don't you see, and then unload - hit
the silk. No tone arm action.

Now, the source of no tone arm action - well, there are
other contributive sources because they all contain in them
this other factor. And you could say that there are an
awful lot of them, but you isolate what factor it is in
each one of those and you'll find out it all comes back to
the same thing: wrong time. No tone arm action equals wrong
time. Reverse it now - wrong time equals no tone arm action.
Now I'll go over these again. If you're running a person
with no tone arm action, you won't make it. I don't care
what you're running and how promising it looks. You'll see
and you'll do it someday and you'll notice the pc setting
the same goals, every session, and the same gains, and so
on. They're doing all right. Well, they lost a somatic, and
they had a little bit of this ... And you say, "My God. How
long can this go on?" Oh, it could go on for the next three
or four thousand hours. You're not getting the job done,
see? No tone arm action equals no processing. Fascinating
but true!

And the other one is, is no tone arm action equals wrong
time; and the solution is - to that is - wrong time equals no
tone arm action. Now, if you can just get those things
straightened out, why you've got it made. These are
terribly important data. I fought for these, as I've been
telling you, since last October. And particularly in the
last few months. And these have been giving me a bad time.
I haven't worried about anything for a long time but when
you figure the number of factors that could have gone into
this problem, I've been throwing them away in avalanches.
You know, stripping the problem down to essentials and
working it back, and so forth. And finally made it and
there is the result of that work. Very important. Very
important. Because there's - there's the cases that wouldn't
have gone to OT see? And there's an occasional case that
was running all right but suddenly isn't running all right.
How do you put that case back together again? Here's the
answer to 90 percent of your auditing problems - 90 percent.

What about the other 10 percent? Well, that depends on you.
If you never follow an auditing cycle, and so forth, why,
you're going to have a lot of trouble. You can still get
auditing done. You're just going to have trouble. It isn't,
by the way, going to stop the tone arm from moving. A no
moving tone arm is - cannot be cured by being a perfect
auditor. That's an interesting fact. That's how important
this datum is, see. It looms, man, it looms!

All right. Let's - let's get now, hammer pound, right to the
whole business of dating. If wrong time equals no tone arm
action and if no tone arm action equals wrong time, then we
have a lot of data that we can figure out, zing-zing-zing,
with regard to any case we're auditing. This tells us that
if we don't know how to date accurately, we are soon going
to have a case which isn't producing any tone arm action.
Well, there's the importance of dating. The greatest
importance of dating is accuracy.

Now, this doesn't mean accuracy down to the last
microsecond. You can still do approximate dating. Of
course, it makes my brains creek a little bit when somebody
says 10.5 trillion trillion years to me.

I can see this enormous span, don't you see, of - lord - the
life term of this planet, according to modern science, can
be dropped into that date at random! Approximately 10.5
trillion trillion years ago. You could just drop this solar
system's whole history, you see, into that date several
times and never miss it! Well, is it 10.51? 10.52? Oh, my
God. Do you know what you've got there? 10.52, and the
difference between 10.51 trillion trillion years ago, and
10.52 trillion years ago - trillion trillion years ago? You
go figure it out some time, and you see what I mean. That's
a lot of years. Vast panorama. And your brain will go
"creak" underneath this sort of thing.

Nevertheless, even that crude a dating pattern is
successful in auditing. You can date that crudely and that
grossly and still make it without lousing up the tone arm
action. So your errors are usually gross, not minor - gross
errors. You dated this thing at 545 years ago and it's
actually at 9 1/2 trillion. I mean that's what we're talking
about errors, you get the idea? We've dated it at 15.9
trillion trillion years ago and it's actually 115,000
trillion trillion ago. You get the idea?

When I mean a wrong date, I'm talking about a wrong date!
The slight error of a decimal place, or something like
that, is not going to cause the cataclysm ordinarily. But
that should be guarded against, too. No, we mean when we
say, "All right, is it later than 115,000 trillion years
ago? Earlier than 115,000 trillion years ago?" and we get
earlier than because the pc thought it was later than and
therefore protests earlier than. And then we don't clear up
the needle or the reaction and we go to, "Well, is it more
than 100,000 trillion years ago? Less than 100,000 trillion
years ago?" And again he says, "But I'm sure it is later,"
to himself; and we get a protest of earlier, so we get a
bigger read on earlier. So we say, "Well, is it more than
50,000 trillion trillion - I mean 50,000 trillion years ago,
or less than 50,000 trillion years ago? And he says, "Good
God, it's much later on the track than that!" He isn't
talking, don't you understand, he's just thinking all this.
And you say, "All right, well, is it greater than one
trillion years ago or is it less...more than one trillion
years ago or less than one trillion years..." getting quite
a read now. So you say, "Well, is it..." We get a
tremendous read now at, "Is it greater than 100 billion
years ago? Is it less than 100 billion years ago? 100
billion years ago?" And by this time his protest is so
great and he's so enturbulated that you get steep drops,
falls and skyrockets and smoke coming out of the meter. So
you say, "All right! That's - that's - that's 100
thousand - that's 100 billion years ago! Yes! That's - that's
the date!" Well, he doesn't know anything about it, he
says, "Well, that's what the auditor said so that's all
right." Now we're going to go to the beginning of the
incident. Now, we're going to get its duration, and that
sort of thing - it's very hard to get its duration. But we
manage to get something, you know, and so on. We run the pc
through all this muck and the next thing you know - you had
a good running needle. And the needle was all right before
you started all this and then the state of the needle sort
of tightens up. The next thing you know, why, your tone arm
gets up here to about 4.75, 4.5 and you run through the
incident, the pc talks about the incident and the odd part
of it is he'll get something there, you know.

And you go through it, and so on, and your tone arm's - 
well, well, you didn't get much tone arm action out of it. 
Well, this next one we're going to get good tone arm
action on, so let's date this next one. All right, now
we're looking for the earlier incident, the earlier
incident of that. So naturally we're going to look at 500
billion years ago, or something like this, and he - by
George, he finds something there that has very little to do
with any part of a chain or anything of this sort. But
suddenly he says, "You know, I've been thinking," he said,
"the incident you've got now, it is much later. I think
it's in the trillions of trillions, actually."

Oh, you accommodatingly date it in the trillions of
trillions, so it finally comes out that this incident that
you have just now found, you see, this incident is at 50
trillion trillion years ago. That's the way it dates. Well,
actually, it was at 500 billion years ago. You get the
idea? So you've got the late one that should be early, and
the early one that should be late and this tone arm now
starts looking like something that's cast in concrete. It
isn't just still, it has a stillness in perpetuity about
it! It's quite intriguing.

All right, so much for that. So much for that. How do we
straighten out this case? How do we straighten it out? We
clean the question: wrong times in auditing; wrong time;
wrong dates. And if you want to clean up a case all the way
on it, you give dating, "On dating, has anything been ...,"
you know. And a girl comes up with the fact that she doesn't
like dating very much with certain boys and you clean that
too, you understand? See? Anything dating means to them,
give it a big 18-button Prepcheck on the subject of dating
and then come around and say, "Wrong times and wrong
dates," any way you want to phrase it: "You had any wrong
dates?" Well, we don't care whether this person answers it
in auditing or not in auditing or in your auditing or
somebody else's auditing or anything else; as long as that
thing ticks, we clean it. As long as we - that needle is
rough on this subject, we clean it.

And what - how do we do it? We date the wrong dates. No, no,
you - you - you - you got that wrong, see, I mean, I - you 
don't redate the wrong dates; you date when the wrong dates
happened. You understand? Was it in last week's auditing
session that you got some wrong dates? Do you understand?
This becomes very involved, you see, because you're getting
times when things were wrongly dated - not correcting the
wrong dates.

And now when you've got the time when it was wrongly dated,
then you run down what was wrongly dated and clean it up
with the pc even if you have to redate it! You say, "Well,
that's quite an activity. You could go on like that for
some time." Ha-ha, yes, I guess you could! I guess you're
going to! And you will mysteriously see tone arm action
restore to the case. Quite an activity. It might take you a
session or two to accomplish the whole thing.

You want wrong dates that the pc guessed at or assumed in
1950, while running an engram. You want the - all the time
the pc assumed that the time track was only 185 trillion
years long. That's a wrong date. Wrong time, isn't it? You
want the times when the pc assumed almost anything on the
subject of dating, particularly dating on the meter
and - thing - but you just clean up anything you can find
until, talking about wrong dates, asking about wrong dates,
asking about wrong times, or anything like that, you get a
perfectly smooth needle. And you keep on going on it until
you've got a smooth needle. Not because that needle's
suppressed but because there aren't any more uncorrected on
this case which are now in restimulation. Okay? And after
that your dating is a ball.

You get reads! Marvelous, you get reads! I mean, your
dating reads easily because you're not reading it through
the fog of a bunch of wrong dates. You're not reading it
through upset about wrong dates, don't you see? On some pcs
all you have to do is ask - just say, "We're going to date
this," and you've got a dirty needle. See? Well, what's
that dirty needle from? That dirty needle is exclusively
from a bunch of wrong dates.

Now, the funny part of an auditor is, is you also will find
his finding wrong dates on the pcs will produce a reaction,
so you clean that off, too. You just clean anything off
that - it is nowhere near the reaction of what's been found
on him as a pc - wrong dates found on him as a pc. But you
may find it in there ticking and kicking - worries about
datings, upsets about this. I'm not giving you a process
now, I'm telling you clean it up! See? Just clean it up. I
don't care how you clean it up. Just get all the wrong
dates off of this thing, see? Get all the anxiety off on
the subject of dating. Now you'll be able to go back and
pick up some of the things that tone arm action ceased on
and all of a sudden have tone arm action.

It may change the programing of the case. You may find the
goal, "to be alone" in the Helatrobus Implants wasn't. It's
in the Gorilla goals. A small error of about 10 trillion
trillion years. It isn't that it had a different line plot,
which it did, that wouldn't have stopped your meter cold.
It's just in the wrong place. Oh, the line plot - wrong line
plot will of course jam up and slow down and raise hell,
you understand. But it really won't do a good job of it
unless the date's wrong.

Now, you find a Helatrobus Implant item at 10 trillion
trillion years ago, Gorilla goals, and you've got what for
that item? You've got a gorgeously wrong date, haven't you?
The goal "to be alone" is in both of them. That's what
stops the needle. That's what stops the TA, rather. That's
what kills your rocket read. It's not the mechanics of the
fact there's a wrong pattern. It's that the pattern is
being used at the wrong date, you understand?

This is marvelous because you'll find everything starts
running - it's as almost as though you had a totally
motionless world and somebody pushed a button on and all
the clockwork dolls all of a sudden start moving, see? How
did that happen?

Your barrier to OT, on 50 percent of the cases you'll ever
come near, was they couldn't run the time track with tone
arm action. Not that they couldn't run the time track with
perception, but that they couldn't run the - because you
give us tone arm action, we can run the time track with
perception, that's not even a problem. You get the right
date and right duration, you get perception - bang! That's
all there is to that. And you do 3- R3R right according to
the book with the right date and the right duration - you
get perception. If you haven't got perception, you haven't
got the right date or you haven't got the right duration.
And sometimes you haven't got either the right date or the
right duration. So you find the right date and you find the
right duration and you send the pc to the beginning of the
incident and a new world opens. He's now got perception.

If it's got a GPM in it and you scan it through him, you no
longer got the perception. The lights go out. Why? Because
you brushed past the items, and restimulated the black
protest of the pc and you - that's that. But as soon as you
pick up the items out of it, the lights turn on again. This
is all very remarkable. Right date, right duration equals
perception. Wrong duration or wrong date equals no
perception. Now there's some other thing that happens.
Dub-in itself is simply a phenomenon of wrong dates.
Marvelous. It's just a phenomenon of wrong dates. That's
all it is. Nothing else. Prove it: Get loud and clear on
your meter - get loud and clear on your meter that the
incident is 500 years ago. Tell the pc - this is a good
running pc - tell the pc that it is 100 trillion years ago.
Get on the meter that the duration is 2 1/2 days, tell the pc
that it is 9 1/2 years. Tell the pc to go to the beginning
of the incident. And you will have a collection of pictures
from all over the track which appear to be dubbed.

And he won't be able to move - he won't be able to move on
the time track. He'll just have pictures and it's all kind
of blaa, and he's not going anyplace and he doesn't get
through anything. In that way you could take a very good
case that was running well and produce this phenomenon we
have called dub-in.

Now correctly date the incident at 500 years ago, say, "I
gave you a wrong - wrong date. The date now is 500 years
ago. Got a wrong duration here," You have to do this in
such a way that he isn't betrayed, "This incident is not
years long, it's actually 2 1/2 days long. Now move to
approximately 500 years ago. Good. Move to the beginning of
the incident at approximately 500 years ago. Very good.
Move through the incident to a point 2 1/2 days later."
(snap) Visio, (snap) sonic, (snap) no dub-in, and tone arm
action. Got it?

This is remarkable. You'll see this happen before your
eyes. Remember that you can make some corny errors that
will include time in them like use the wrong pattern, get a
lot of wrong items, start crumpling up facsimiles. You'll
see normally that these don't interrupt tone arm action.
They upset the pc but they don't interrupt tone arm action.
Pc's still getting something like tone arm action.

But don't go diving overboard when you see that tone arm
action cease on the basis of straightening out items and
getting in - getting in a bunch of Prepcheck buttons on
wrong goals and all kinds of other rationale. Na-ha. You go
to the basis of wrong dates and figure out how it made a
wrong date and then correct that and all of a sudden your
tone arm action is restored. And until you do that, you
won't get any tone arm action! You run the Helatrobus
Implant plot on a Gorilla goal. It's obviously a
wrong date. It's not the wrong plot. It's the wrong date.
You'll find that the same goal also occurs in the
Helatrobus Implants or some similarly worded goal. Well,
you've got to straighten that out, otherwise your pc will
be upset.

It's wrong time, however, that will restore your tone arm
motion. You got it? Straighten out wrong items, don't let
me downgrade those things because they're very tough on a
pc and they leave a lot all over the thing, and so forth.
When that tone arm stops moving, there it is.

Now, one of the things that you will run up against, you'll
occasionally flatten a chain and your tone arm action will
go up. This has something to do with wrong dates more
deeply seated in the case than you have power to overcome
without reassessment. The guy's got stuff all wrongly dated
himself. He had a bunch of stuff wrongly dated. What he did
exceed his level of reality.

Now, let's look a little bit further at this whole subject
of wrong time. Now let's use wrong time to get a case that
cannot run engrams. Let's get the subject of wrong time
here and let's get this case into shape to run engrams. In
other words, let's reverse the whole magic and let's take
the guy who is dragging bottom and let's use the subject of
wrong time to give him tone arm action and put him on the
time track. How would you go about that?

Joe Blow: He can't run engrams because they're unreal. Goes
into any past life - they're unreal. He'll tell you this
right away. Everything is unreal and he can't believe it
and he doesn't believe in that sort of stuff anyway. What's
his wrong date? Life began at birth. So let's just strip
off of his case every consideration that life began at
birth. And all of a sudden up will go his reality and he 
can move onto the backtrack. Or whatever else wrong time
you can find associated with that subject, don't you see?

His error on wrong time is the length of the time track. He
thinks the length of his time track is his age, 32 years. 
Well, that's a hell of an error! Look at it, though, as a 
trap mechanism. "We have only lived but once." Look at that 
as a trap mechanism! Isn't that fascinating? You wonder why 
is this so popular with the savants of science. Oooh! Why 
do they insist on this? Why do they raise so much fuss with
somebody saying he's lived before? Well, they wouldn't
raise that much fuss unless they had some idea of entrapment 
in mind. Nobody ever protests against truth unless he has a 
vested interest in falsehood. Yeah, I'm afraid this one-life 
proposition is a method of tying everybody down to the ground. 
It's much more important than you'd think!

Let's take this case: he can get back fifteen or twenty,
thirty lifetimes; he can get back to the Roman Empire let's
say. Now that - beyond that it gets pretty unreal. He just
got a wrong time someplace. But remember, you can run him
within the span of what he considers right time. You can
run him in that span. So you've got to clean the dates out
of what he considers right time and you will find that
you're gradually extending his time track backwards.

TBD
Now, this happens to any case, it isn't just one lifetime.
I'll confide in you that the first time an incident was
spotted on me, in the four trillion bracket, four
trillions, you see, trillion trillion trillion trillion
bracket, my immediate thought was, "I'll never get back
there! If that exists, and I did get back there, there's 
- would be nothing there anyway." It just - just was too 
big. I was running with great happiness at the time, I
was running hundreds of trillions. This was - this was a
ball, I mean, this was - I was getting so I was running this
with better reality than I used to have on this lifetime,
you see.

And when I found myself one time at, I think, about eight
trillion trillion, the incident I was in seemed awfully
long ago and very, very unreal. It was just an awful long
time ago. I didn't have any reality on it. There was
somebody pulling some caper of putting horrible looking
hands in the sky in order to intimidate people, you see,
with the coming of God, or something. And I didn't know, I
said I must be back at the beginning of the time track, or
I - something or other. I just couldn't make head nor tail
out of the thing.

And then we found the beginning of the incident. We found
we'd had a wrong date all the way along the line. And all
of a sudden this all brightened up and the reality factor
came up.

So any case is going to hit a ceiling of reality on the
subject of dating. Some people can go back trillions and
some people can go back minutes, some can go back years,
some can go back this lifetime, some can go back a lot of
lifetimes. Some can go back millions, some can go back
trillions, hundreds of trillions. When you get up into
trillions of trillions, why, you could expect almost
anybody to creak one place or another. But they only creak
to the degree that there's wrongnesses on time - time
wrongnesses. That's the keynote, and that's the key to that
situation.

Now, you're not working particularly to increase the
person's reality. You just go along in the general course
of running R3R or R3R plus 3N or just 3N or anything that
you're running - whatever you're doing - date correctly,
duration correctly. If you're running into trouble, you're
not getting tone arm action, pc's ARC breaking and so
forth, the first thing you suspect is not a beautiful
significance but a wrong date, a wrong duration, see? 3N,
you're not using durations, but you'll have a wrong date.

Now, a wrong date can sneak in on you without doing any
dating. You just supposed the engram - the GPM you were
running, you see - you just supposed that this thing must be
in the Helatrobus Implants because you've heard of the goal
in the Helatrobus Implants, and that sort of thing, and all
of a sudden your pc's tone arm is up there at 5.0 and he
isn't RRing. Well, you say, "Well, how can I have a wrong
date because I've never assigned any wrong - any dates at
all to this?" Oh, no, you never assigned any dates at all,
don't you see? And, oh, no, you never assigned any dates at
all. The goal takes place much closer to PT than the
Helatrobus Implants. By saying even the Helatrobus Implants
and give him that pattern, you wrongly dated the goal,
didn't you? The second you straighten out where it is,
whether you run the goal or not, you'll suddenly have
restored your tone arm action.

So there is the boulder on which the bark flounders. First
you have to know what a foundering bark is. That is
cessation of tone arm action. When you see tone arm action
seceded from the session, you know that the bow of the
vessel has run on a large jagged boulder and is going to
sink from here on. It'll sink slowly! It'll sink for
sessions before you suddenly find there's water around your
feet. Your pc isn't talking to you now. You wonder how this
ever happened. And then the pc is not only not talking to
you in session but also is not talking to you out of session.

And you want to know what happened. "I must have had an ARC
break" - figure, figure, figure, figure, figure, see. Oh
yeah, he probably had an ARC break, but that won't do it
very permanently. When the bark really went up on the rock
was when the tone arm ceased. And you can go back and look
for the last session in which you had tone arm action and
look for the wrong dates in that session and the next one.

Now, never leave a wrong date on a case. Just don't leave
one on a case, that's all. There's several things that you
don't audit a case with. One of them is a wrong goal.
You've got a wrong goal on a case, you clean it up - first
order of action. But this takes seniority even to that,
now, we found a more important level. Don't pick up a case
that has had a bunch of R3R, or something like that, and is
now not getting tone arm action without cleaning up the
whole subject of wrong dates. Just straightaway clean it
all up. Whole subject of dating - let's get that all cleaned
up and then proceed. Because the cessation of tone arm
action on the case came from wrong dates.

Now, I wouldn't pester a case that had good tone arm action
unless the case started to ARC break more often. I would
tend to assume - I would tend to assume that we were running
the case on a wrong assessment or we're pushing the case
too hard or going uphill. I would also assume these things,
you see.

But I would make sure that all this wasn't happening
because of a wrong date. No matter what else I was doing, I
would throw this in, you see. It was like the fellow - the
fellow who repairs the airplane, you see. He repairs the
airplane, he fixes up the motor and does everything else to
it, you know, and then throws a - and then puts a rabbit's
foot in his pocket, you know. Same type of action. See,
you've done everything that you can do, that you can see on
the surface of it, well, also do this one, don't you see?
Just throw it in. I don't care where you throw it in. You
see that it's quite important.

Now, a case which is getting tone arm action from 3.0 to
4.0, if you got all the wrong dates off would probably get
tone arm action from 2.5 to 4.5. So it isn't something you
just use on stopped TA action. You can also speed up your
TA action by cleaning up this thing, see?

Now, some cases are so unreal on the subject of time that
they almost stop if you misdate a little something - it
isn't even an important date. You say, "All right, I see
here that you have an engram," or he's got a lock or
something of this sort, "in 1952," and it's actually 1953.
You try to run the pc through it and the tone arm will go 
clank and stick. Redate. "Oh! 19 - hehheh-1953." All right, 
we straighten that point of dating out. All of a sudden your 
tone arm action is restored. That's because the case has got
built-in wrong time. In other words, this case has been so
overwhumped with wrong times, one way or the other, so many
GPMs, so much this, so much that, and so on, they're pretty
woggy And you start auditing them, they can hardly take it.

So that gives you a point of approach as far as processes
which can be audited on the meter, which is a dating point
of approach. Now, how much good could you do a case that
otherwise couldn't run engrams and had no track just by
sitting down and doing a good accurate job of dating
anything under the sun, moon and stars on the case?
Interesting! Because it would produce a real time track at
least in this lifetime. Just find the date of everything.
Don't run anything, see. Don't run anything, just find the
date of everything. See, "When did you go to school?"
"Well, I think it was about 1943."

"Well, all right. Good, good, we're glad of that." And so
forth. "Let's see, let - let me check that now." We have to
have a certain reservation on the amount of invalidation we
do of rechecking the wrong date, don't you see? The best
way to do it is just to check periodically in the session
for a wrong date. Minimal invalidation, don't you see?
Normally, on such a case we say, "When did you go to school?"

"Well, I don't know, I thought... if that was 1932, no it
was 1951, no it was. .." You know? Say, "Well, let's date
that."

Well, let's get very fancy. Let's get very fancy and nearly
always date in "years ago" because you can be too often thrown 
for a loop by dating on Earth time. Pc hasn't been here but 
about two lifetimes, see, and you're trying to date 1776 - A.D. 
1776. Where did that come from? A pc will be falling all over 
A.D. 1776, whereas he responded on years ago. And then you 
finally find out if you're running engrams, that, why, he 
hasn't been here on Earth, he's been in some other planetary 
system. They had another time.

Now, in the - in the final analysis here, as a final word on
this subject, this has been an interesting sprint. And it's
toward OT and it's been an interesting thing, which has closed 
the door - has kept the door closed. It's just been wrong time
- wrong time - that kept the door closed and that is what will 
basically close the door on anybody.

Now, let's take a reach and withdraw process and I'll show
you what I mean. A reach and withdraw process - I'll give
you another talk about this, all about reach and withdraw
some other occasion - but we've got this person walking from
point A to point B in the room and they're walking through
facsimiles. Now do you see that as a wrong date proposition? 
Matter of a wrong date!

They're walking through the room and they're stepping
between maypoles and eventually the experience of walking
through the room brings them to a realization that this is
this date. You don't necessarily find what's the date of
the maypoles, you understand? But it brings them the
accuracy of this date which cures some wrong dating to that
degree.

Now supposing - now let's get fancy, this is not necessarily
a recommended process or anything, because that other
process I'm just giving you is very successful. Let's take
a look at this. We walk them through the room and they keep
running into ship capstans. And the second we find they're
running into ship capstans as they walk through the room,
we grab our meter and date the ship capstans accurately.
Got that? We don't run the incident. Let's just date the
ship capstans and then let's return them to walking back
and forth across the room until they run into something
else. And there's some beautiful black-eyed maidens, all of
a sudden, that they're walking through and trying to avoid.
You know they're aberrated if they're trying to avoid them!
Let's just date these beautiful black-eyed maidens. Got the
idea? That hasn't even been tested - I'm just, you know,
that's just off the cuff. I'm just showing you how can you
use this principle called wrong dating.

Now, I've taken the lowest level process we have that
produces results, you see, how you could apply it to that?
One, it applies to that naturally because it shows present
time is present time, but you also could use dating in the
thing and square that around.

You could probably take a case that couldn't remember half
of this lifetime and cook up some means of dating this
lifetime and making it accurate. Accurately dating this
lifetime and getting it in line and getting things in
sequence, and that sort of thing, and all of a sudden you'd
find mysteriously that he had a tremendous reality on all
of this lifetime. There are many other ways of producing
this, but this is very direct - very direct method of doing 
so.

This data I've given you in this, is the make-or-break
point on about 50 percent of the cases that you will ever
audit - it'll be the make-or-break point. You'll get a lot
of people through by the skin of their teeth and panting
and huffing and - but you'll make it, you understand, it's
rough. But this is the other 50 percent that wouldn't make
it at all.

To that we must add, however - we must add, however - good
auditing and all the technology. Okay?

Thank you very much!

=======================


