

SHSBC-392 14 JUL 64 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY (confidential)

This tape is omitted from the SHSBC cassettes.

Transcript of Taped Lecture by L. Ron Hubbard
ShSpec 29  -   6407 C 14
(Renumbered SHSBC - 392)
July 14, 1964

 TRACK AND BANK ANATOMY

(applause)

Thank you! Very sorry to keep you waiting. It's not my
fault. It's Reg's clock (laugh). That's correct. It
said... it's wrong, so.... I'll have to turn on the clock
in me head. What's the date? (Audience: 14 July.) 14
July, the 14th - We have a new student, stand up and take
a bow - Tom Morgan And somebody we have seen before,
retreading - Jean Jacques Scalance.

Alright! I'll have to make up for it by being very
interesting having bored you to death sitting there ten or
fifteen minutes with nothing to do. Well, I think I'm just
going to give you right off the cuff, all of you right now,
a rundown on exactly what the track and bank looks like and
here at the lower levels particularly restimulated and
particularly the newcomer on the thing, why the best thing
to do is to turn it off is to just run on through Class VI.
That's the best way to turn all that restimulation off.
And.. (laughing) and, when you're Class VI, go right on
through to OT. That turns all the restimulation off
(laugh).

Now, let's just give you a very rapid fire lecture, and Reg
will be cursing in his beard because he'd want a camera on
this particularly, but I will do it all again with Fillips
and Furbelows. Very interesting doing things with
Furbelows (laugh), and here's the way it sits.

There's a thing called the reactive mind. The total
composition of the reactive mind consists of the following
factors: Are we away? (laugh) Alright, it has locks, it
has secondaries, it has engrams. Got that? Alright, in
addition to those locks, secondaries, and engrams, one of
the most notable facts that it has, which comes to view
once you start, is implants, implant GPMs and then various
forms and varieties and that sort of thing, and they make
little black masses that are quite interesting to collide
with, and they can be run on almost anybody, and actually
comprise, the implant GPM comprises Class V. Old Dianetics
dealt with the locks, secondaries, and engrams and Class V
deals with these implants and their various ramifications.

Implants are interesting in that they very often have
engrams in the midst of them. You run half an implant and
somebody slips off the post and something like that, he's
got an engram and somebody getting him back on the post.
You know, that kind of thing. In other words, there's all
of that still exists in the mind and that ... those, those
implants go along with dating, you can date implants very
easily, go along with other whole track phenomena. And,
there's two branches then to the whole track phenomena
which belongs at Class V, and one of those is implants and
the other one is engrams. And, various types of engrams go
back all the way along the track and there's some rather
unbelievable time spans involved in all this.

It goes very, very long. It ... You can get dates of
trillions to the one thousand three hundred power. That is
a date which you would spend the rest of your life writing.
That ... It's just, cyphers that go on and on and on. I'm
exaggerating when I say the rest of your life, but it would
just go on and on and on and on.

Now, because people have been implanted, and because
implants exist, and so forth, then it is very easy for
someone to get confused about what is called an actual GPM
and the actual reactive bank because he immediately
conceives that it has been done to him, and is all mixed up
on the situation, and he is very likely to believe that a..
an implant and a GPM are the same thing.

Now, if you want to become very ill, several methods of
becoming ill will be covered in today's lecture, if you
want to become very ill, indeed, why just start going
around and saying that actual GPMs are, are implants. If
that's... if you want to get sick, that is the best way I
know of to go about it, and if you want your pc to get good
and sick, why have your pc start arguing around about this
without you suddenly chipping in and saying, "now, when was
the first time you considered this?" You know, and just
run it out as a series of considerations right now, and
he'll come off of this wild kick because he's going to make
himself terribly ill if he says that actual GPMs are simply
implants. Now, we are not interested in whether they were
implanted or not implanted, I'm just telling you one
marvelous method of getting sick. You understand? I'm not
saying even what they are. I'm just saying that's a nice
way of getting sick.

Now, therefore, we get down to Class VI, and we've covered
everything else now except, of course, the fact that what
you're auditing up to Class IV is the destimulation of the
things you erase at Class V and VI. You want to know what
these Classes are all about. What Classes I to IV are
devoted to: auditing which destimulates those things which
are erased at Classes V and VI. You understand? Therefore,
there are only two erasure Classes and those are V and VI,
and there are four destimulation Classes. So, that you
never try to erase anything, actually it's quite incidental
but you really do get erasures accidentally of little odd
bits on Classes I to IV. There is a small amount of
erasure that does take place, but the moment the that the
auditor tries to erase something, while auditing in those
Classes with their processes, he is in immediate trouble.
I'll give you an of idea how this is.  I'll show you the
difference of Classes.

You say to somebody, you say, "You say you don't feel well,
alright, what's the matter?" "Oh, you got a headache,
alright, well now, recall the first time you ever tried to
get this headache cared for" "Recall an earlier time you
tried to get the headache cared for" is a more exact
command, because he won't give you the first time, the
first time. And, he gives you something, and gives you
something, and gives you something, and all of a sudden his
headache disappears. Well now, you've, you've
destimulated. You've destimulated.

Where's the headache? Well it actually isn't out there
lurking, waiting to pounce again, but if it comes back
slightly nobody should be very surprised, because having
done this exercise, of asking him for his considerations
about headaches, or what he's done for headaches, or how
headaches have been handled by him, and so forth, or what
he's done to a headache. We don't care what we ask him or
how we asked him for these considerations.

Don't get this mixed up with OW. I just heard crosswise in
your head that you had. No, it's any recall process, see,
which would lead to a banishment of a headache no matter
what you did, and then you found out that he had banged his
head on the corner of a kitchen sink at the age of five.
He got rid of his headache slightly, see, so then you decided
to really find out where this headache came from and you found
out that he was banging his head on the corner of the
kitchen sink and then you said, "Well now alright, about
banging your head on the corner of the kitchen sink when
you were five, how did the room look at that time?" "What
was said at that time?", and boy, he's got that headache
back with exclamation points. You understand?

Now, you've destimulated that same incident when you simply
asked him for some considerations. You destimulated in
general, the whole subject of headaches, but then you have
come back and try to erase this. You see? Now you're
gonna go through and scrub out what you have assigned the
cause of the headache to be.  You're going to erase that
thing and he's going to get a nice headache back. Now the
funny part of it is, you could go on through and erase it
only to find out that it really wasn't when he banged head
on the kitchen sink at the age of five. It was when he
fell out of the perambulator at the age of three. So, you
have now erased that and this would all be better, and then
you could find out that it wasn't that at all, but in his
last life time he was really shot in the head when he
kicked the bucket. So, that puts you back into the last
immediate past death. Now we're gonna run all this out
from one end to the other. I see some of you have been
over this road ... and there would be an astonishing return
of, of perception and he would feel pretty good about this,
and so forth.

But, either you did a terribly even nice smooth job of
auditing the whole way, and you could keep running this
back... Now, let me point out to you, that the second you
went into that past death you moved into Class V. It was
at that precise instant. It was perfectly alright to
handle banging his head on the corner of the sink in this
life time, you're, you're a perfectly good auditor, but you
moved out of Classes I to IV even on what little you can
erase in those Classes. See, you've moved out of that.
You've gone on to whole track. One more life time than
this one and you're on whole track and you're in Class V.
That's the way we classify it these days. Don't you see?

You got no business being there these days because of this
interesting fact. It is absolutely factual that an auditor,
smoothly auditing, can go back and erase enough of those
engrams, we did it in Dianetics, enough of those engrams to
make that headache go away and be good and the fellow not
bothered with it at all further more. This is perfectly
true but the number of incidents, I'm putting you all into
focus with regard to the reactive mind, the number of those
incidents which added up to a headache, may well be in the
billions, which is why we departed from Dianetic into
Scientology technology. And that's the exact reason why
there is a bridge between Dianetics into Scientology.

Whatever else anybody wants to assign to it, whether
historical reasons, or anything else, that is the great big
milestone on the road. The discovery that there could have
been billions of engrams on the track, each one of them
capable of causing a headache. And to get rid of all of
those engrams in times and terms of auditing, in view of
the fact that man is only here for seventy years at a
crack, to get rid of all those in a pc was not feasible.
It wasn't that the technology was not do-able, as a matter
of fact, we recently improved the technology. You could
run an engram now by plotting it's time, and spotting it's
duration, and boy, if you got those two right, pictures
turn up all in 3-D. This poor guy he's never had a picture
before in his life, see. You do that engram technique that
we developed here a year or so ago, I got, I finally got
whipped out, and so on, and boy, he's got visio and he's
got the lot, see. All you have to do is do an accurate
spotting of the time of the engram, find it's exact
duration, and move him up some place toward the beginning
of the thing and on go the lights, see, and you're away.

So, the big problem of erasing engrams, the pc had no visio
or sonic, that was dealt with and there is such a
technology, but it still doesn't solve this other auditing
factor. The auditing factor is, is billions of incidents
exist on the person's track which could cause a headache,
see. Let's say you've got a chronic headache, well also in
running this you find out he also has a chronic foot ache
and it has more billions, you see, so all of this becomes
infeasible. It is not do-able simply because the auditor
hasn't got enough time to handle that many incidents. It
is not, now, that they could not be handled, you
understand. But he hasn't got enough time to do it. You
could take this technology of erasing engrams and take
ninety-eight percent of your pcs and go ahead and run
engrams on those pcs with this technology and they would
very soon begin to fly.

But that is an erasure technique, and to achieve any finite
end within the lifetime of the pc and yourself, due to the
quantity involved, becomes impractical. That's why! And,
that's why the shift in Dianetics and Scientology and
that's why these other approaches. That's erasure! So,
erasure from I to IV, it is not that it couldn't be done,
it's that you haven't got time to do it, and you can do more
for the pc by destimulation that you're simply keying these
things out. In other words, park them over in their proper
area without paying too much attention to them. In other
words, the indirect approach to these billions of engrams
was simply to destimulate the pc on the subject of keying
them in, in this lifetime, and you find, quite remarkably,
that this is highly workable. Destimulation as opposed to
erasure.

Now, there is then the dividing line, between I to IV and V
to VI ... V and VI, is those early ones are, simply because
you can turn off somebody's headache and then if you don't
try to erase anything, that's what I've been trying to
teach you here, if you don't try to erase anything, if you
don't push him back into the bank and you don't crowd him
back into it with some nonsense or gobbledegook of some
kind or another. "Well, I didn't get that, would you go
over it again. That was a what? Well, I didn't quite
understand this, oh, it's a... well, it's alright." But
the auditor is just being too something or other.

He's concentrating the pc's attention on the backtrack,
see, and he says, "Oh well, that happened when you were
five, alright. What did you say you put your head up
against? Oh, your head hit, hit, hit a sink, alright. What
sink? Where were you living at that time?". Well, you've
done the exact approach that has long since been designed
on how to get somebody into an engram. And if... of
course, he'd go into the engram at that time, and your job
is actually to destimulate, not erase. You see that? Now,
oddly enough, you can still destimulate after you've done
all this.

You just pick this session. Now, you've obviously made
locks on the incident and this session. Don't you see?
So, you just ask him, "When was the first time we started
to talk about it in this session?", "What considerations
have you had about it in this session?" You go all over it
again, and magically, if you audited that very smoothly and
destimulated this session, why all of that would fly back
into the background again, and once more, he would be rid
of it.

So, we have two distinct classes of auditing and we have
two distinct things which are handled, and therefore all
auditing between I and IV is the handling of locks,
especially the lock known as a key-in. I won't bother to
go into nomenclature in this lecture. If you don't know
those words, look them up.

So, it's handling locks. So, I to IV isn't handling the raw
meat of life, and we have omitted number V because it now
isn't necessary, and this brings us vis-a-vis staring into
the lion's feted breath. That's VI. So, what you're doing
now is a transition from sweetness and light of one I to
IV.

   The spring sunlight pattering
   on the freshly born leaves,
   pan pipes trilling in the distance.
   The full volume Ride of the Valkyries,
   with no transition,
   done in a dark cave
   with red bloods and spots.

And if this is something of a shock to your steady factors,
well, fine. I would be very happy if it were possible to
put you through the two or three years of training
necessary to come up the whole gradient.

So, it's not necessary to come up to those whole years, so
the thing to do is just brace yourself for a shock, take it
on the chin, and plow on. You understand? So, actually
all of your auditing up to IV is destimulation, handling
the little key-ins and locks, "My momma spanked me and I
considered at that time, that I hated women", you know.
"Ah gee, somehow I feel suddenly better about, about....".
That's not what it's about, see. Do a military drum doing
muffled rums, and he's going off to the executioner's
block.

The somatics with confront required - pretty tall, pretty
tall. Big jump, big jump for a pc. Big jump for an
auditor. I just want to show you there's a section missing
in the training and tech, but it is possible for you to
make that jump and it is possible for the pc to make that
jump, without an awful lot of stuff, providing you do I to
IV well, and that's the area that you got to do well. Now,
what have you got to do in I to IV?  In I to IV you just
got to raise his cause level so when he eventually begins
to confront the real raw meat of the reactive mind, he can
as-is it. If he can't confront it, he can't as-is it. If
his willingness factor is too low, his cause factor is too
low. If his cause factor is too low, he can't look out
enough from where he is to as-is anything in front of him.
We've had other lectures on this particular subject. That
is not new ground.

So, your thing to do there is just raise up his cause level
- then throw him to the lions. Alright! It's something
like the Russians trained their troops for World War II.
They took this fellow and they showed him how to handle a
sub-machine gun, heel strip it, put it back together again,
fire it, and then sent him to the front lines. That was
his total military training, see. And then his survive
became soldiers. (laughing) So, this is heroic, see. No
effort being made at all to do anything very gradient about
this, and this brings us right down, with no more gradient
than that, to the reactive bank basic.

The basic raw meat of a reactive bank is the GPM. And the
GPM is caused of masses and significances, as you will find
in other materials, and has certain forms and sizes, and my
lecture mainly concerns it's patterns, here today.

Now, there are people around that tell you, "Naw, Ron must
be wrong, I've never seen any mass in GPMs - oops,
well.....mass...GPM ...(muttering) ... so I wonder why I'm
so hot". Well if you're running straight down instead of
the center of a GPM and you're running dead on, which you
can do now, of course you never see anything. The second
you begin to see anything, you must realize something has
been skipped. The only time anybody ever sees anything,
there's something wrong. You jumped a GPM. Well all of a
sudden you're gonna have visio. You jumped an item. Well,
you're gonna have nice visio on the item you jumped because
it's not going to be behind you, or ahead of you, or to the
left, or the right, or someplace. Do you see this?

Now, in the final analysis, a GPM is composed of mass and
significance, and it's located, and so forth, but you don't
have to worry about it being, too thoroughly, about it
being timed because it really doesn't matter what time it's
timed because it is timed. And one of the reasons why it's
very difficult to find the top of the bank or the bottom of
the bank and so forth, and that sort of thing, is because
it is time itself. So you try to find the top of the bank
and well, that would be the part which was made last. Yes,
how can there be a last when this is the thing which has
made it first and the last.

In other words, the characteristics which you normally
assign to objects in their position, location, and age,
these characteristics are gone when you get into GPMs.
Now, you can say, yes it runs in this order. Oh yes, it
does and you'd better run it in that order and you can say,
well it starts here and it goes there, and so forth. Well
that's simply, sort of on the basis, it's easiest to start
here and go there. Don't you see? Because there was no
start and there was no stop. But, there is a significance
of starting and stopping in it, and if it weren't for any
GPMs, there wouldn't be any significance of starting and
stopping. How do you like that? See?

The thing exists in space, but the GPM is what makes the
space for itself to exist in, see. It has age, but it,
itself, makes it's own age (chuckle). So, therefore we
say, this is the first end-Word. Well, we have said that
this is the first thing about the thing that makes a first,
you see. It wouldn't necessarily be a first engram. See,
there couldn't be a first End-Word, really. This is why
the wits are ... is very difficult to grasp at first glance
because you see everybody trying to grasp it is
tremendously influenced by it, and the considerations
people have of things are caused by these considerations
and significances which are in the GPMs. You see? It's a
snake eating up his own tail. It's that kind of a problem.
The snake ate himself up and disappeared. Well, that's
really what happens when you run a GPM.

Now if ... the consideration then, the consideration of
time, the consideration of space, energy, all the various
things of which a GPM is composed are contained as
significances in a GPM. Very, very puzzling. So, somebody
trying to understand life sitting down on a mountain top
some place in lower Jesus or some place, .. Jerusalem,
excuse me, and he's contemplating his navel or something,
and trying to get the hot dope, he gives you all sorts of
things. If he starts to get close to the truth, then the
things he utters appear to be idiocies, see. If he gets
close to the truth. Like, there really is no universe -
Mary Baker Eddy. There is no universe. All is infinite
mind. Isn't it true? It's very, very, very true but that
doesn't prevent Christian Science from being the leading
religious faith you find on the rosters of insane asylums.
See, it's a truth which isn't quite true enough to save the
bacon of the person's faith.

(continued in part 2)
_


Part2


 Truth must be truth. It must be all the way truth. Now,
anybody who is studying slowly, and so forth, gets caught
up in this factor: That you can't go part way to truth.
The most suicidal activity that you can engage upon, is to
go part way to the truth. You've got to go all the way to the
truth. There are no half truths. About the most dangerous
thing you can have anything to do with is a half truth.
There are.. people have understood this, that a little
knowledge is dangerous. Well, that's actually not very well
applied, that's not even very well stated, and it certainly
isn't the same sense of what I'm saying here. No truth can
be half way approached. If you got that far and didn't go
any further, you would fall flat on your face and be in
quite a mess. If you set out to shoot the moon, there is
nothing sillier than going into perihelion around it for
the rest of your life (chuckle). You've got to land on the
moon. There is no substitute for totality with regard to
truth. In other words, you've got to know all of it.

And this is ... this I'm trying to field a philosophy. The
Bugdeammerbum.. the famous witch doctor from lower
Scrambula, he puts his foot on this line and he says,
"There really is no time" and he doesn't go any further
than that. He teaches everybody, there really is no time.
He's put himself and everybody around him with one foot on
the banana peel and the other in the grave, see. He hasn't
told them why there is no time, see. He hasn't told them
anything, and all he'll do is ... everybody goes around
saying, well there is no time, so it doesn't matter, but
yet, echoing in around in their skull is the fact that it's
true, there is no time. That is a truth, but it is so
little of the truth. Without somebody going the whole way,
it actually becomes quite dangerous. The whole race would
then simply go in apathy and that would be the end of it.

And that is what has happened in almost all philosophies
that I have ever heard of. See, they get some corner of
some truth and then they don't walk down that road and they
go no further than this. You see? And they sit around on
mountain tops regarding their navels and they do weird odd
ball things, and they wonder why they're not getting any
better if they know so much. Well, the reason they're not
getting any better, even though they know so much, is
because they started on the road to truth and they never
made the passage and they're something like a ship-wrecked
ship. They're high and dry on that reef and they're never
gonna go any further. But having gone that distance, it
wrecked them. Now this in itself is soul chilling.

This pronounces something quite interesting to you. You
can say, well we started into Scientology. Yeah, you
started on a road toward truth, didn't you? The only fatal
thing you can do, if you know this about your pcs, and you
know it about those around you, and you know it about some
of them fallen by the wayside, you instinctively feel it.

Having started, ceasing to go is one of the most fatal
things they could do. Now you look at this with some
sadness because it's actually a very fatal action. But let
me call to your attention something else. It isn't that
Scientology got you started on the road to truth. You
started on the road long time before. You've been on that
road ... When you sat down in the amphitheater, when you sat
down in the amphitheater in Greece and listened to somebody
saying philosophically, yippity yappishly, that something
is the end of the road and Kronos actually devours his own
children and therefore the whole universe is circular and
whatever else is being said. You started on the road to
truth and you can speculate along this particular direction:
what is the truth in this matter? What is the true composition
of this universe? What is my true identity? Who am I?
What do I consist of? Where do I come from?  Of course,
nearly everybody has asked that question of himself since
he's a little child. You started on the road to truth.
That's dangerous, unless you walk the whole road.

That road's got to be walked because the character of the
GPMs themselves admit of no halfway measures. You key in
of one of these GPMs, and you key in a series of GPMs, you
get them all roiled up and then you don't do anything about
them, you're in the soup.  They contain the end all of all
explanations. Contained in the GPMs are the explanation of
the universe in which we live. Their identity, everything
everything is composed of. The impetus. All of these very
things.

In other words, the philosopher busy philosophizing and
having himself a ball on the subject and coming up to some
conclusion. Let's take Einstein. Einstein was walking on
this road. He had finally gotten up to a point where he
was trying to integrate life into his other equations and
he was groping, groping, groping and he left one of the
most remarkable, he left one of the most thoroughly
remarkable messes for ages forward to figure out that you
ever cared to have anything to do with. When he died he
had a bunch of consultations. In other words, he was going
towards the everything of everything. In other words, he
was going towards something that explains everything, and
he hadn't arrived any closer than a bunch of symbols.
Having figured out his various equivalents of constants,
and speeds of light, matter, energy, space, and time,
having figured these out, he was trying to squeeze life
into this somehow or other, and he left an awful hodge
podge of figures which everybody worships back where he
was, Princeton I think it was... And they're busy trying
to do something with this now and it's all very complex
and it's all very something or other. In fact, everybody
around there is half way spinning, what the devil were these
last equations that Einstein wrote. He was just trying to
integrate life with the universe. That's, everybody would
say, an over simplification. No, it isn't, that's a more
truthful statement. That's closer to the truth than they
are. He was just trying to integrate life and the universe
and that and that. That's all.

The old Encyclopedia Britannica says in order to understand
space and time, you had better understand the mind because
it's very often, very possible, that space and time are
simply generated by the mind, how do we know. Interesting.
That's in the 1890 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica.
Marvelous insight. Very well put. I noticed it hasn't
been followed by anybody else. You notice that science
today says the mind is so in error, it is so inaccurate, is
so this, that it is just nothing in mechanics at all, but
mass is all and the mind is nothing, see. The universe is
everything, and the material things in existence are this
and then he is just a spontaneous combustion from mud, and
this is all he is, and he's just a lousy bum, and you talk
to one of these boys and their whole orientation is in this
direction. He will say, "Oh a computer, oh well a computer
never makes a mistake.  This is the run, it puts out all
these marvelous things, look at these marvelous things.
Human mind, agh, human being agh .... (muttering). Yeah,
listen to these boys. I've tried once in a while, timidly
for me, to say, "Who feeds the data to this computer?",
"What feeds the data to this computer, and get an answer
out of it and who inspects that answer after it has been
printed but the mind, the being, the person, the
individual." Yagh-yagh-yagh, they can't get this point at
all, see. In other words they've got now, the cake is more
important than the baker, see. You've got an end-all cake
that's self-generated and sprang spontaneously from the
cook pot, but no baker. The cake is greater than the
baker. Don't you see?

So, in studying R-6, the first thing we have to recognize
with vividness, is that we're dealing with the baker, not
the cake. We're dealing with the thing that makes it, not
the thing that is made. We've got to recognize that, and
that'll explain a great many failures auditors have when
they begin to approach R-6 and it's auditing techniques.
They pay all their attention to the mass, the GPM, the
significance, and to hell with the pc. Well in actual
fact, if you don't pay attention to the pc and his reaction
by keeping in a good auditing comm cycle, by doing good ARC
break assessments when you got by-passed charge, by first
and foremost taking care of the pc, by making absolutely
certain the pc doesn't have any PTPs at the time he's being
audited, making sure of all these little points, keeping
that pc in good communication, handling that very nicely,
making sure that all the items read, the pc is satisfied
that they have read, that the pc is cheerful and happy
about this, then you've just got an end-all cake, and you
got no baker. And it's the baker you're trying to handle
and it's the baker you'll be left with after the cake has
been et. So, you take good care of the baker. So a few
pieces of cake get chipped up. Well that's not very
important as long as you take care of the baker.

An individual is an individual and now you find this
inherent in early Scientology teachings where it was taught
more instinctively than factually, you see. It was taught
more on a basis of general knowingness. I knew how these
things were. You'll find that the being, the individual,
had generated the universe and part of that universe is the
GPM, and the GPM in it's generation then restrained him and
compelled him to covertly go on making the rest of the
universe unbeknownst to himself, and compelled him by his
own generation to go on making it, the GPM, see. So you're
not quite sure when you first look at this thing which way
is which. Is the cart drawing the horse or the horse
drawing the cart, you know. When you first look at it you
will say, "Wow - science, modern science has said, well,
it's all cake, and there's no baker", see.

Well let's take it up a little bit further. The first
trouble you're going to have and that is, is the course ...
is, is, is the cart being drawn by the horse or is the
horse being drawn by the cart, or who is running what, and
as the pc begins to look at this he actually can accept
intellectually, he's making this thing that is smacking his
face in but he can't put any part of it into actual
subjective reality. So it's a point you don't force down
his throat. It will eventually begin to dawn on him. He
gets to be further and further on a gradient of cause over
the GPM in spite of the fact that cause itself is an
end-Word.

The point is here, he gets to be, actually, more and more
cause over this GPM. See, everytime you're falling across a
real significant significance or something that is
absolutely necessary to do anything about anything with
you're also colliding, madly, with GPMs. You understand?
You're colliding with the meaningness of a GPM in some way,
shape, or form, in any human action, and in any part of or
action about this universe. It really doesn't matter much
what corner you approach of livingness or life in view of
the fact that livingness and life is created by the
individual through the GPM.

He creates the GPM and it creates it, but he's long since
forgotten he created the GPM. "It looks to me like"...,
you see, he would say, "it looks to me like the cake, you
know, is creatin' the rest of the kitchen." (chuckle) Why,
he will then not be able to very intelligently grasp the
fact that every time he tries to address any corner of
existence, he starts to feel strange or peculiar. Well
naturally, any corner of existence is already capped with a
GPM because if it wasn't, it wouldn't be there.

So, all of a sudden a guy is just thinking a thought, see,
thinking a thought at random. Alright, that is either a
lock on a Root-Word or a lock on an End-Word, see. One or
the other. It's a lock on a Root-Word or a lock on an
End-Word. That's it. I don't care what thought you just
thought, if you thought any at all, So you mustn't get
into some weird, you mustn't get into some weird odd-ball
contest of trying not to think in some way, in such a way
as not to restimulate a GPM. That doesn't happen to be
possible.

There's no particular reason for you ... I already went
over this rolley-coaster here a few weeks ago, it was a
relatively short time ago, I had to decide what this was
all about and I had to get down and work it all out very
carefully, and I did, you see, and that's the conclusion I
came to: That he built a universe through the formation of
a GPM and he couldn't think any thought to amount to
anything. But didn't amount to anything, he couldn't think
any thought that could impinge on one, one way or the
other. I made an actual test. It wasn't intentional.
It's with causation. I was telling you about cause level
and I had this struggle about trying to form a
communication about cause level, and I said, "Well I
don't ... " I knew that cause and so on, was an End-Word
in a GPM. We'll get on to what End Words are, and so forth,
in just a moment.

Well, I knew that it was an End Word and therefore I tried
to get around it by saying causation. Erase the causation
of a pc. And I tried to get around it also by using
causativeness, to increase the causativeness of a being.
And by the time I'd carefully written the bulletin, which
you have, carefully scouting this on causation and
causativeness, I was sick as a pup. It wasn't that I was
restraining anything, or anything, I was simply mis-wording
an End-Word. So I went back, I went back and scrubbed all
that and simply put cause down there well knowing that it
was an End-Word.

You don't want to keep repeating an End-Word at somebody
when you're giving them auditing commands. You can get out
to an outer perimeter lock. And that's what you want to
keep repeating, like "done". Well, that's very nice - done,
done, that's good. "What have you done?". That's good.
Withhold - no, that's a Root-Word because every time you
say withhold you're going to key-in directly and
immediately some other portion. You're gonna key-in
somebody faster than you're easing him up. Don't you see?
So, it's best in an auditing command to use an indirect
action. But in the discussion of communication of
anything, if you try to escape the significance of an
End-Word or the significance of a Root-Word, if you try to
escape these things and not mention them, all you do is
suppress them and the final result is, is you're
practically around the bend. So, the best answer is, the
hell with it. Say 'em. Do them. Not with a repetitive
auditing command. Not in a constant hammer pound of an
auditing command.

But a careful review shows that you can't escape this
particular thing and it shows, that when you're trying to
be technical, that a departure from the exact statement is
liable to make you sicker than an approach to the exact
statement. Then that says where you sit and where you
think. Now the number of Root-Words and End-Words which
you hear battered about every day, laid end to end, would
be longer than the Queen Elizabeth's passage from New York
to London. Every cocktail party on there, all they do is
bat about large numbers of Root-Words and End-Words.

Now, the worse off a person is, in actual fact, the more he
will talk in Root-Words and End-Words. Sanity, if it is
anything at all, would be the gradient scale of
destimulated Root-Words and End-Words, and insanity, would
be the command value of the Root-Words and End-Words over
the individual. Not their restimulation, but their command
value - that would be insanity. If Root-Words and
End-Words have a disproportionate command value over the
individual, you can say he's insane. Now that's ... That's
interesting too because insane, of course, is an End-Word.
But you have to step outside the basic considerations.

But quite in addition to adding both the universe and
personalities and reactions and so forth, the individual is
still quite capable of independent thought. And the reason
you have Dianetics and Scientology is totally attributable
to the fact that I've been walking, to a very marked
degree, outside the perimeter of reactive thought while
considering these various things. Now that's very
interesting. We got some place, you see, and didn't get
detoured into it even though we were dealing with and very
often using it.

Now take the very step with which you work - ARC. Affinity
is an End-Word - Reality is an End-Word - Communication is
an End-Word. There are three End-Words in a row, all the
way down early on the track and, theoretically, it should
make everybody sick as pups because it's so early. You
know, you destimulate the charge of them. Now, you're
living right in the middle of the fourth lightning if you
live in this universe and you're actually further from it
in Scientology than you are if you were out digging a ditch
somewhere because, believe me, that foreman when he comes
down the line is going to speak nothing but Root-Words and
End-Words. He's going to be pretty batty on the subject.

This little jazz musician, "Is that something!" "Boy
that's nowhere!" All in expletives. But they're ... you
get the idea? There's a vast difference here. They're
dead on dramatizing. They're completely unwitting. It
would be quite another thing for you, a Scientologist, to
be dead on wittingly. I know when I'm using Root Words and
when I'm using End Words to a very, very marked degree. If
I hadn't been aware of one before, if I ponder one too
hard, I'll get warm. When I notice that I'm getting rather
warm, I say, "Well what do you know, I wonder if that's a
Root Word, I wonder if that's an End-Word?" "Alright, it's
a Root Word. What do you know, must be a Root-Word
because it wouldn't add up any other way."

I found out that the resistance to and the flinch from
these things is what does the damage, not the use. That's
a very subtle point for you to know in Class VI. Very
subtile, so get that point down very well. It's the flinch
from, you see. It's the suppression of; it causes you to
feel dizzy and woggy and sick at your stomach. And
invalidation of, is what causes pain. Invalidation, of
course too, is an End-Word, but that causes pain. If you
want to make somebody hurt like crazy just get him to get
down, and say that it isn't true that there is a goal of
something or other, something or other, which is a real
goal, you see; or say it isn't true there is such an End
Word, and he's getting real excited about it, and the next
confounded thing you know, he'll feel like he's being sawed
up by a butcher's powered beef saw. What happened? Well,
the liabilities then are the liabilities of contest with
and dramatization of.

Contest with, is your greatest liability as a student.
Even though you're afraid of something you're still in
contest with it. It is that, and you are you. Afraid to
do these things. Walking the chalk line about them. Being
careful in consideration of them and those sort of things.
Well that's, that's where the damage comes. Then you say,
"Oh brother that's nowhere, that's really nowhere", you
know. "That's no..... I wonder what the hell I'm thinking
nowhere for, you know, what's all this nowhere. Tah, must
be an End Word. Ah, it's nowhere". You know, get the, get
the delicate shift here, see.

Alright, so you're gonna keep saying nowhere and make
yourself sick at the stomach and so forth and restimulate
the End-word "nowhere". Alright, that isn't going to worry
you until you suddenly realize you are saying "nowhere" and
to that degree dramatizing the thing, and then say you
mustn't because it is an End-Word. Now, you get that
subtle one? Because that's where you go over Niagara Falls
in a barrel. It's right at that point, see. You say,
"Well, I shouldn't be saying that because ...". Don't you
see?

Now, I've taken a new look at all this. So, you find out
after a conversation with somebody or other that you're
absolutely reeling. You've been talking about these things
and the room goes out of plumb, and so forth. So it does.
So what? Now, you really want to make it go out of plumb?
"Well I mustn't really discuss this anymore". Well, you've
knocked it all out of plumb with your locks. You see that?

Now, you find yourself dramatizing these things every once
in a while but it's only a sin not to eventually catch
yourself. I don't expect you not to dramatize them.
They're only still here, so you're dramatizing something
about space and matter, that's for sure, and time is
passing, so you must be dramatizing collectively, something
about time.

Alright! Well, let's figure this little other tiny nuance.
You all of a sudden find that you're sitting there saying,
"Tsk, problems, problems, problems, problems, now wait a
minute, I must have an End Word or something in
restimulation", see. Even though it's next week before you
find that out, see, and then not make the mistake of
saying, "Well, I mustn't say problems any more to myself",
see. Because the recognition of it is enough. You don't
have to prevent the future, because that's an End-Word too.
(laugh) So the gist of the situation is that you're
surrounded with these things and all you've done to date,
until you collide with them in study, is simply dramatize
them.

Now what's happening to you is you're finding out what
you've been dramatizing. Your face, every once in a while,
will be rather red on this subject. I, myself, pushed
myself away from an auditing session. Just very mildly
pushed myself from an auditing session and walked around
the room for a little while once, and I came back and I sat
down and I went over ... there wasn't anything wrong. I
was getting reads, everything was just fine. And I went
over everything under the sun, moon, and stars that I could
go over, and tried to compare everything that I had done
and everything I hadn't done and I was looking for this and
that and all of a sudden it occurred to me, I wonder what
I'm trying to do here. Why am I reviewing everything that
has happened here, you see. And then it suddenly struck me
that the next goal up that I was about to run was "To create
problems". I had simply been sitting there fearing
problems. I laughed at myself and ran the next pair. That
was the next one coming up. And I was - I was creating
problems - LIKE MAD. (laughing) You know what I mean?
You can't actually expect not to do it. If you didn't do
it, you wouldn't be part of the universe. Don't you see?

Your advance, is to some degree measured by your
recognition of what you, yourself, are doing. And a real
recognition comes about when you realize that you're making
these things up and of course about that time they will
cease to. Now there's a trap in all this of the tremendous
quantitativeness of them. There appear to be so many that
you become exhausted. The figures on this are variable.
There's a slight variation in these figures but the best
figures I have is 268 Roots and 268 End-Words. That makes
it square. There are 18 RIs in a GPM - proper line plot -
268 Root-Words in one series and 268 End-Words, or 268
serieses. Now if you multiply this one times the other,
you'll find then, there are in excess of 23,000 GPMs.

Now that, of course, is so staggering, there's such an
astonishing number that it makes you feel rather quivery on
a subject of, "I've got to audit all these out and it's
taking us a session, or in some cases it's taking us two
sessions to run out a GPM, and we're doing turn about type
auditing and I actually am only getting three sessions a
week and I'm running one and one half GPMs a week and there
are 23,000 of them to run out. So I can expect to be OT,
of course, at the end of, something on the order of 33,000
weeks, or something like this. And 33,000 weeks divided by
52 gives you the nu.... Oh my God!"

Well, of course, it's not the way it goes. This would be
good pedantic mathematics but it doesn't happen to be an
accurate situation. Once you've got your plot well oiled
in, you're spending less and less time in trying to find
your way down the bank. Don't you see? Once you've got
.. ninety percent of this work, by the way .. well I'm not
quite ... yes, I'd say ninety percent of the work has been
done on the organization of this. The consecutive adjacent
Goals and the consecutive adjacent End-Words are, are still
in a state of polish. They're mostly known, don't you see,
but they could be wiggled or wobbled to be here or be
there, or be something of the sort, don't you see, but the
trick was to get the pattern. Of course, the biggest trick
was to find out it was there at all. But to get the
pattern of this thing took me over a year and a half of
some of the wildest most troublesome stuff I have ever been
through. Very gruesome.

I look now on an auditor who can't find a few synonyms.
He's got one, he's got one to spit, you know. He can't
find the next goal which is to expectorate. I rather look
at this as being rather poor because the next goal to spit
is to, of course, - this is not a proper Root-Word - the
next goal to spit would of course be to expectorate, see.
It's to spit cats, the next goal is to expectorate cats,
you see, and the next goal to it would be to spitee cats.
Very imaginative. You've got "to run" is next to "to gallop",
you see. To travel fast, to speed. They're just all tied
together, the same word. Same word, and it's got to be
checked out and the best thing to do this with is one of
these New Rodell Word Finders. They're only available in
the United States and they're very, very fancy. They've
had a lot of college professors working on the thing and
they were nicely keyed-in and they practically laid the
bank out in this thing unwittingly and unknowingly and you
look up a list of synonyms, brother it will find the next
door cousin in most of the cases.

(continued in part 3)
_

part3


What gives you trouble is you sometimes have prepositions
and conjunctions in the goal. Usually just prepositions
and you have to bend your wits around a little bit. You
get a goal like - this is not a proper one but I'll just
give you a form - "to run away from cats", see.

So what is the basic, the basic rundown here is the
pattern. The pattern has been found and that is the most
important part of any of this, is the pattern, because, you
see, there could have been trillions of patterns possible.
The bank is so charged. It is so full of locks that almost
anything runs, almost anything reads. It's the woof and
warp of life. You can walk your way through to what is the
central pattern of all this, - forms auditing research
papers which if stacked up here on this platform, would
reach from the very far end of that platform to a height of
about two feet, or three feet, all the way over to the
other end of the platform. Just single sheets of paper,
notes and records of running possible combinations. And it
is actually quite agonizing to run these things backwards
and upside down and wreck yourself like a fire drill. So,
it's very difficult to find this pattern. You're being
punished all the time for trying to find the right pattern.
Don't you see?

There is no half way road to truth. Don't you see? A GPM,
of which you have all of the items, which is properly
worded, and so forth, runs like hot butter, providing you
haven't skipped too many, or something. That's, that's
that easy. But the GPM of which you have one word missing,
or one preposition missing, runs with pure agony, see.
This is no good. You have to be dead on. We're getting us
to a point where we could be dead on, but it's very
difficult, and that bridge has been very well crossed and
we're very glad to be back. The listing the auditors are
being asked to do at the present moment is just sign the
adjacent consecutive GPM wording, see, that he's got there.

Now, they don't vary. Everybody has the same pattern.
They all start in the same place and they all end in the
same place and they all have the same wording. Some people
have some holes in the track, however, where ages past they
have tried to chew up a GPM and get free. And there'll be
little holes, where just half of a GPM here and there is
badly chewed up, and your most greatest liability there is
running into an ARC break that occurred maybe thirteen
trillion years ago. The greatest liability is the ARC
break with the bank thirteen thousand years ago.

You all of a sudden are running down the track - this is
rather rare but I'm just telling you what the score is -
You get half way through this thing, the GPM, everything's
running fine and all of a sudden it's all running bad and
you wonder what's going on and you trace it up and the guy
is looking at this or that and he can see things and he's
upset about something or other and you find out that
thirteen trillion years ago in an enthusiastic ambitious
moment he decided to ... he found this one, to bite this
one in half, and tried to do something about it and chew it
up and of course, he had the wrong goal and the wrong
items.

Sometimes you get a read on an ARC break assessment
- wrong goal, wrong item and you find out it was in
yesteryear they were a wrong goal, wrong item. It had
nothing to do with your auditing. It was some little self
auditing this boy had done thirteen trillion years ago or
more. You got the idea? You occasionally run into this.
So, you've been trying to buck these things for a long
time. Of course, in several thousand of them there's maybe
one half of one GPM chewed up, so this doesn't compose much
of a problem but you can run into them.

So people have been at it and trying to do things about
these things for a long time. They haven't gotten any
place, they've gotten themselves stuck in trying to list
something without a meter and without auditing discipline
and without knowing the pattern, and so forth. They just
pull in a lot of End-Words on themselves and they've been
unhappy ever since. The most recent incident I know of was
about 139 years ago, sitting on the side of Mount Pernasus,
cussin' these dam things. Messed them all up, pulled them
all out of sequence, just cussin' them. Finally saw that
there were these masses so I couldn't see the escape from
the masses, so I couldn't properly exteriorize. I started
cussin' them.

You'll find out this sort of thing has occurred. A person,
of course, gets into this state. He doesn't know what
these are, he doesn't know what they're all about. He
doesn't know what they're composed of and he's already been
bit two or three times when he's collided with these things
so he doesn't want to know too much about them. Well, he
has to know them dead right before they are completely
painless and safe to live with. You have to go the whole
road to truth.

Now, they are very, very simple in essence, the whole
pattern is extremely simple. I can tell you in a very
brief space of time. I'll write it down here. A Root word
.. let's, let's, let's be happy about the thing, the
End-Word, although it sometimes doesn't sound very normal,
is always a noun and a Root-Word is always a verb of some
kind or another. So, we've got something like this. We've
got a complete GPM and this is what you know as own Goal
and that sort of thing. Let's go over this. And, it's To
Eat Cats. Let's, let's get this now. To Eat Cats. We
notice here that we are on the end of this thing - Cats -
and that is an End-Word, and because that is an End-Word,
there are going to be 268, or there abouts, GPMs all ending
in Cats in a row. You may not be at the beginning of it,
you may not be at the end of it but you know that they're
all in a row. There's 268 Root Words which end in Cats and
they're all consecutive and in sequence, see. We got, to
eat Cats - to dine on Cats, you see - to consume Cats - to
digest Cats, it'll probably be your next type of thing.
Just a tiny bit of shift, you see, goes from eat to digest,
and there's gonna be three like to digest Cats, you see.

But they're all gonna be Cats, Cats, Cats, Cats and it's
gonna be out there for 268 GPMs. Now a GPM consists of 18
RIs. Those RIs in 2 rows of 9 in each row and they begin
with the Goal as an RI at the bottom and they run on
to the top. And I'm not gonna bother to tell you the line
plot right now, but the line plot is posted in the theory
room. 18 RIs in this line plot and one of the main
difficulties you get into, is the line plot is itself and
the End-Words are themselves and the Root-Words are
themselves and they don't much cross. So, if you had in
the line plot Edible Cats, which we don't have, you see,
but if you had in the basic line plot Edible blanks, see,
you would then get, To Eat Cats would read as a Goal,
because it reads off the line plot as a lock.

But it would check out as a lock if you're smart and clever
and work hard and ask several times. Most of the reasons
you fail to check is you ... you fail on checking, you
don't ask the second time, you don't ask what it is and you
don't ask where it is. Ask if you've missed anything - you
don't add that to your checkouts and that's when you miss
on a checkout and then you find out there's four hundred
and sixty-five dozen reasons why you shouldn't have run
that GPM that you were busy running, but you, you just
didn't ask the question. So, of course, now the pc's in
trouble and so forth. It wasn't consecutive, it was
improperly worded.

"Is this an actual Goal?", you ask; you get a read.
Well if you get a read once, the pc might have just
breathed, you see, hard or he might have had a heat
wave hitting at that particular moment, or something
like that. So, one read, oh puff. One read, phooey. You
don't buy anything on one read. The question is, can you
make it read again. Then you say, "Is this a correctly
worded actual GPM?" Sometimes you got some knuckle-headed
pc that insists, well you found out once, why should you be
asking again. You find out that all of your repeat
questions, and so forth, are being suppressed. So, you just
have to handle that as an auditing problem. He's got
duplication, or something like that, stuck as an End-Word.
Don't you see? He doesn't want any duplication in his
vicinity.

So, what's this, what's this Cats? That's a ... an
End-Word, that's an End-Word. There are approximately,
apparently, 268 of these things and they go plus - minus.
And it would be something like - Cats and Catlessnesses -
or something like that, see, or it would be something
opposite to Cats. We don't much care what's opposite to
Cats. It's what is opposite to Cats that would appear on
the end plot. But it's something that's definitely opposed
- not, not dogs, you understand. Dogs as a beingness is
opposed to Cats. No, this is, this is the End-Word. But
it would be an absence of Cats. Don't you see? The
End-Word isn't an absence of Cats, but that's what the
End-Word would mean and you would express something like -
Catlessness - or something, you see. It's the opposite and
.. but what makes it difficult, is that it's only the
End-Words which go positive - negative and that gets very
confusing and that's very upsetting, but they go plus -
minus in groups.

Now if you have something to do with positions or
locations, and so forth, this just runs on endlessly.
You've got all kinds of pluses and minuses with regard to,
to positions and locations. And since the most assessable,
accessable End-Words that you will collide with on a pc,
the most ... the best End-Words you collide with on a pc,
are according to what I've seen anyway, is HERE. H-E-R-E -
not plural, but H-E-R-E - and that, of course, has just
above it - THERE - which is the opposite to HERE. Don't
you see? And those are your pair of actuals, and go this
way.

Now, there's these 268 of these End-Words and they go to
the middle of track and then the sequence of plus and minus
reverses on the word - NOW - which is in the middle of
track. Here's the beginning of track, up this end, if you
wanna have this end. It's at this end, and NOW is in the
middle of the track and the PRESENT is at the furthest end
of the track. Now the present just beyond it has the
ABSENT. That makes life more interesting. You'd never
find anything. HERE has several more toward PT but they
all have to do with this kind of thing, you see. Most of
them do ... have to do with this kind of thing, they're
plus and minus. But, what I'm trying to show you is, that
the middle of track of NOW has got an earlier on one side
and a later on the other side of it, so it's actually
used twice as a positive, which switches the order, which
switches the order of positive - negative. So that BEFORE
pair to this NOW, the earlier half of the End-Word series.
Just don't consider anything but this End-Word, see.

The earlier half of this End-Word series has the negative
further away from the top of the bank. The negative is
further away from the top of the bank, and the positive is
nearer the top of the bank, by one, you see. But the NOW,
up here to here, the negative ... this causes tremendous
grief, that's why I didn't find it at first ... the
negative is closer to the top of the bank than the
positive. The positive is further away from the top of the
bank. You understand? In other words, they do a switch
because the center End-Word uses a double. It's double
used positive. NOW, you see, has two negatives. So, if
you work that out, you'll see that's very simple, that's
very simple if you just write down plus as the middle of
the track and then minus closer to PT and then a minus
further from PT and then alternate pluses and minuses both
directions. Then you'll find out that, of course, the
first half of the track is opposite the other half of the
track as far as the plus - minuses are concerned. You got
that? Alright!

That is the way the End-Words lie and what's difficult
about it, particularly difficult about it, is the fact that
the track is really basically circular. But, you'll find
out that there is a thing which answers up to being the top
of the bank and you can get the pc into a lot of trouble if
you run the "quote" beginning of the bank before you run
this end of the bank. You understand me now? But there
really isn't any. You got it? For some particular reason
when time was finally plowed into it, and so forth, why
HERE operates as top, or first thing to run. NOW, of
course, operates as the middle of the bank. Something you
won't get to until you're half done, and the PRESENT is the
last thing you will run out. And, of course, those three
things tend to lock up on each other which keep the bank
with you all the time.  Adroit, isn't it?  And, of
course, you don't find these negatives because of the
obvious. See, you found HERE so, of course, you don't have
THERE, see. Then you get things like EVERYWHERE and
ELSEWHERE, see. That's another pair. So, it's pretty hard
to navigate through these End-Words if you don't know the
pattern.

But that is the pattern of these End-Words and it's, it's
pretty easy to do. It's a positive - negative proposition.
There is no numerical repeats. It doesn't go twenty-one
earlier as the negative, or so forth, that trick isn't
there. It's just ... it's common just as I've given it to
you. It's rather ordinary. You could sketch it out on a
piece of paper. There's just middle of the track and the
negative on each side of that plus word, comes on out to
the ends and, of course, there's half of 268 End-Words
this way from NOW and half of them the other way from NOW.
So, it's elementary. Then they they tend to curve around
and lock up and it makes the track look truncated at Goals
because Goals, that's the big obsessive one, see. And it
makes the track look truncated at that point, and the track
will answer up as truncated and is runnable at that point
but it isn't necessary to run it that way, see.

It doesn't really matter a cotton pickin', confounded,
doggone where you run any of this as long as you don't run
it blind. In other words you say, "We're running the
fifteenth End-Word in sequence from the top of the bank"
and telling the pc that it IS the top of the bank will turn
on a somatic because you've misplaced it. Don't you see?
Because that restimulates placement and you get the somatic
from placement. Don't you see? But if you just sawed into
it and then you found out how many End-Words there were
above it, and you said, "Well, we're running the fifteenth
End-Word", the pc would say, "Alright" and you go on and
run it and you do run it. You got the idea? It's nice to
run it all in order but if you can't run it all in order,
don't run it blind. Know what you're missing, see. Know
what you're missing in order to run it.

So anyway, the net gain of that is, that is the pattern of
the End-Words and then these are the Root-Words - TO EAT -
EAT here we call the second word, just for lack of
something because it's needed in the line plot as the
second word, and the TO is just gratuitous, but TO EAT, you
see, TO EAT is the Root, what we call the Root. And we did
say Root-Word. Who cares whether we use Word or not, see.
That's the Root and there's 268 of these Roots and you get
one End-Word, it's got 268 Roots. Pocketa-pocketa-pocketa-pocketa,
268 Roots. And they all go in the same order and they have
the same sequence of Roots and they're in the same consecutive
order for every End-Word. So if you've got CATS, you got
these same 268 words for CATS. If you've got DOGS it's the
same 268 words in that same exact order for dogs, don't you see.

This makes all kinds of interesting mathematical
computations and so forth. You can take any random End-Word
almost and add these Root-Words to it and it sounds very,
very significant indeed. You see that? So, there's always
this same sequence of Roots. Always the same, and that is
the same 268, see. The only thing that changes then in
essence ... a series is this 268 Roots with one End-Word,
and the only thing that really changes in GPMs then, since
the line plot is the same for every GPM, all 23,000 plus,
or whatever the figure is, well, the only thing that ever
changes in the GPM is the End-Word, and that only changes
every 268 Roots. So, it's a sort of slow freight, see,
slow shift.

Now, the line plot is the independent items which fit TO
EAT CATS. Now we've gotten it down to TO EAT CATS and that
itself is a little bunch of mass and significance which is
composed of 18 separate items, two columns of 9 each which
are in opposition to each other and bring each other about.
And those 18 items, each one ALWAYS has the same form and
it changes just with the Goal you are using. So if you had
.. just as a ... an incorrect example but nevertheless an
example of it, you have EDIBLE BLANKS, see, why in the line
plot, why this simply transposes into EDIBLE CATS. If you
had an End-Word, ELSEWHERE, it would be EDIBLE ELSEWHERES.
It would become plural if it's not already plural as an
End-Word. The plurals are all taken care of in this. It's
not difficult. So you have EDIBLE ELSEWHERES, see. And
this line plot simply repeats in every one of the 23,000
GPMs.

It's just a substitution, you know, of what Goal it does
have itself and it's always the same, and it's always in
the same sequence, and it always comes together that way,
and it brings each other about, and locks each other in.
And that line plot is so composed as to lock together GPM A
and GPM B. In other words, GPM B is expressed in GPM A's
bottom pair and in GPM B the bottom items of GPM A are
expressed in it's top pair. In other words, these are
nicely intermingling.

So we have an item at the top and an item at the bottom
which directly refer to the adjacent GPM, see. So that's
what keeps it, keeps it gripped together, see. And then
those End-Words in sequence, they don't really grip
together beyond shutting off from one and getting the
idea, the next one and approaching it, and that's where
they grip together. It's a sort of travel thing, see.
A guy decides for GPM after GPM, "well we're gonna
leave here now, we're gonna shove off, we're gonna
skip it, we're gonna get out of here, we're gonna depart;
yeah, I better, I better, I better scram", and so forth and
then eventually, magnitudinously thinks of the next one and
it's first GPMs are just getting the idea there might be
another one and considering this for a while and pondering
and looking at it for a while, and deciding he would do
something toward it and then approaching it and then
getting near it and then eventually walking around, and
arriving at it. You get the idea? And eventually he's
there and there might be some trick interlocked between
them, but ... I wouldn't rule it out totally, but I haven't
found one. I've just found these two adjacent GPMs go
smoothly together. That is entirely, the total pattern of
the bank. There is nothing more in the reactive bank than
that.

These things run by the discipline of Scientology and you
have to take very good care of the baker because the
baker's making all this, and you never have to run out
23,000 GPMs for the excellent reason, sooner or later he's
going to cognite he's doing it, and that's the end of it.

He can give you a false cognition that he's doing it and
still have his head knocked off by the masses. He can sit
back and decide to decide he's doing it, you see, so
therefore, it'll all go away. Won't do him any good. It
happens when it happens, not before. And actually it's a
pretty long, gruesome, arduous run and it's run today by
platens. It can be run easily by platens. Nothing to it.
Just cut pieces of cardboard with the pattern of the GPM
written on the tops of the cardboard and just fill in one
word. Cut 'em out with a razor blade. And a platen is an
L-shaped hole. Nine L-shaped holes in series, with the ...
your bottom part of the hole is what you write your data
in. You just put 'em on an 8 x 13 sheet of paper and you
don't even have to write all items. You go
pocketa-pocketa-pocketa. When you first start in, you
better write out the items.

But there's the, there's the whole composition of the
track, there's the GPM, the auditing technology which
runs it. It's very, very smooth auditing and draws it
to an exact drain of charge of each one of these things
in turn and the charge goes away very fast. Usually in
one or two big reads and you position it one way or
the other and eventually, why, you get in your X step.
It's very rapid and frankly, running with a platen
and so forth, you can dispense with one of these things
about one a minute. If you got up to one a minute, and so
forth, that's 23,000 minutes to OT, at the absolute outside
because you never get to the 23,000 minutes. Sooner or
later the guy's gonna say, well the hell with that, I'm
making it all up. At that point he's gotta fly out of his
body and straighten up the auditing room chairs by taking
him out of his state.

But don't let anybody get away with the idea, "Well I
realize I'm causing all these ..caugh,caugh.. things and...
you'll see that, by the way, that'll be very frequent. I
know, I know people. So any how.  Know 'em and love 'em,
live with them, and straighten them out for the various
reasons, but they do have their foibles, and they will
crowd it (garbled). They will push it, they will get
anxious.

Alright! And that is the total composition of the bank.
And there isn't anything else in the bank that you need to
worry about because there isn't anything else in the bank
because all engrams, locks, secondaries, and this is why we
don't run them, implants and all other such bric-a-bracs,
theta traps, all the rest of these things. Of course,
they're all sitting as locks on the GPMs. Now you say,
well we can expect to go on and find the GPMs, they're
sitting on locks someplace. Yes, they're sitting ...
they're all locks, on a thing called a Thetan.

Thank you very much.

           ******************************

(end of lecture)
_
