6510C14 SHSpec-68 Briefing to Review Auditors

     There are three key data that go out in an org and therefore are
essential to be known by the Department of Review, that LRH hasn't been able
to teach Tech, Qual or orgs.  You will hit them in Review, because no one else
will have gotten them:

     1.  A HIGH TA IS OVERRUN.

     There is no other reason for a high TA.  Review's problem is to find what
was overrun and how it was overrun.  When someone comes in who has never been
audited, and who has never been near another "therapy" or practice, and whose
TA is at 5.0, he has still been overrun on something.  You just have your work
cut out for you in finding it.  Don't throw away the datum, the way everyone
else has.  Using this datum, you are likely to find some interesting things.
Say someone went release on Christianity at age six, or on exercise at age
twenty, and then went on past that point, doing it some more.  Releases don't
only happen in scientology.  It is likely to be some wisdom or therapy that
released him.  They are all failed technologies.  All past wisdoms may have
had technologies that have been alter-ised and lost.  We almost went that
route by not recognizing the state of release and the phenomenon of the F/N.

     What has been overrun is not necessarily what the PC was running when the
TA went high.  You might have overrun some earlier release.  It may, for
instance, be a restimulation "of an earlier overrun communication release."
The PC could have been a problems release and gotten keyed in again on a ruds
question.  If the HGC or field auditor didn't repair it by asking, as a first
question, "What was overrun?", they would never solve it.  They would get the
wrong overrun.  You must find what, exactly, the release was on.  Which or
what one was it?  Get the right when and the right what, and the TA will blow
down, and the needle will float.  You've got to rehab the right release to get
the high TA down .  There could be other overruns on the case, too, but there
is one that is making the high TA.  Get that, and the rehab tech will get it
to F/N, quickly or less quickly.

     2.  A ROLLER-COASTER CASE HAS AN SP IN THE VICINITY.

     The anatomy of the PTS is that of a problem:
postulate/counter-postulate.  The person's purpose (postulate) has been or is
being suppressed (counter-postulate).  There is no other source of
roller-coaster.  An SP gives the PTS a problem.  When the PC roller-coasters,
he has run into a postulate/counter-postulate situation since his last gain.
A PTS really does make trouble for the auditor, the org, and himself.  Ethics
exists to get tech in.  If it is ever used to throw tech out, it is being used
suppressively.

     Search and discovery is used to find the suppressions that a person has
had in life.  The S and D question is:

     1.  "What's been your main purpose in life?"

     2.  "Who opposed it?"

This often makes a problems release in minutes.  With a PTS or with any
problem you want to solve, "find the source of the counter-postulate....  Man
gets "solutions' to problems....  He leaves the [two opposed postulates] in
place, not knowing the definition of a problem, and then "solves' the
resulting collision, as in Dialectical Materialism -- the anatomy of a problem
gone mad.  "Any idea is the product of two forces," is the backbone of
Dialectical Materialism."  To solve a problem, look over the whole perimeter
of counter-postulates and find what is the source of the problem.  If you
handle the problem for the PC, often the problem will evaporate for the other
person, also.  Problems sometimes evaporate in the physical universe when you
find the source of the counter-postulate.  In ethics, "when you see that the
disconnection or the handle ... causes an enormous problem for the [PTS] or
for the other person from whom they are disconnecting, you have invariably
found the wrong person....  PTS is the manifestation of a
postulate/counter-postulate."  Find who, when, where, and what.  You could
list, "What purpose of yours has been thwarted?" You can get a Grade I release
with this.

     Suppressives are now to be lo ated in Review, because ethics has flubbed
it too much.  PTS's go to ethics after Review to have note made of the fact
that they ar PTS and to get a statement made of handle or disconnect.

     A PTS condition can be caused by a suppressive action, as well as by a
suppressive person.  For instance, if you overrun a PC past release, the PC
goes PTS to the auditor, just as a mechanical action.  Self-auditing is a
potential hidden source of overrun.  You don't declare the auditor an SP.  It
was a suppressive act, that's all.  The definition of PTS is "connected to a
suppressive person or action."  The action could be inadvertent.

     So you find the suppressive person.  The person may have only been
suppressive for five minutes, or he may have been suppressive for a lifetime.
Someone could be PTS and overrun.  In that case, you must get the suppression
off and rehab the process.

     A suppressive person isn't someone with horns.  It is someone who has had
a counter-postulate to the PC.  A person may occasionally commit suppressive
acts, or he may be habitually suppressive.  Someone who is routinely
suppressive in life, invalidative of scientology, and trying to keep people
from getting well is a social menace.  He is the subject of ethics.  He is the
one who gets declared, not the auditor who overran a process from some
inadvertent or stupid mistake.

     When you tell a person the right SP, it is like locating and indicating
BPC.  You should get a blowdown and GI's.  If the PC again roller-coasters,
you've got another SP.  So there could be several SP's on the case.  You don't
go looking for all of them at the same time, but [after you find one
suppressive] look for another one.  If you found all the SP's and suppressive
actions in a person's lifetime, he would be a problems release.  And if he
goes release on problems, he won't go PTS again, unless he goes home and
starts self-auditing.  He can overrun himself on self-auditing, so be aware of
that.

     3.  THE SOURCE OF OVERTS IS AN EARLIER MISUNDERSTOOD WORD.

     The source of the overt is the other key datum that has been missed:  A
misunderstood word causes individuation, which leads to overts.  The word that
a student is arguing with the course supervisor about is later than the one
that the student really misunderstood.  Any confusion, stupidity, or upset in
study always stems from a misunderstood word earlier than the one he is upset
about.  It is always earlier! So the source of the overt is in the formula:

     1.  Something is misunderstood.

     2.  The person individuates.

     3.  He commits overts against the misunderstood thing.

If what the person thought was the misunderstood was the misunderstood, the
problem would have blown.  So it is always earlier.  This datum is the key
datum in the area of study and comprehension of existence.  It regulates a
person's I.Q.

     The Review action is to look for the earlier area and the earlier word
that was misunderstood.  [Cf. Method 1 Word Clearing] You can unburden a few
words earlier than where you think the misunderstood word is, then get the
misunderstood just before it.  You can date the time of the misunderstood.
You should ask what subject the PC was in.  A person isn't upset with
studying.  It is only a misunderstood word.  It is not case, and it is not the
environment.  Remember that you are handling fringes on end-words, so don't
push all the way back into R6.  Just find what was happening before he hit the
thing he doesn't understand.

     So these three data are the only ones that are really important in
Review:

     1.  High TA = overrun .

     2.  Roller-coaster = PTS = Who is the SP?  That question is the source of
         hang-ups on the track.  You must find the counter-postulate and the
         source of the counter-postulate.

     3.  Confusion comes from a misunderstood word earlier than the one the
         person is confused about.

