6112C12 SHSpec-91  Sec Checks in Processing

     What every good auditor should have:

          1. A British Mark IV Meter

          2. Someone to handle appointments, money, etc.

          3. Two understudies who have had good HPA training and who need some
             real brush up to Class II.

             [See HCOPL 26May61 "Modification of HPA/HCA, BScn/HCS Schedule"
             Per this P/L, the HPA course consists of two Units: Unit 1 and
             Unit 2.  Unit 1 consists of TR's, metering, model session, and
             ruds; Unit 2 consists of the 36 pre-sessions, finding the Hav and
             confront process for the PC, general assessment and running pcs
             on prehav scale (not SOP Goals), and sec checking.]

             [For definition of classes of auditors, see HCOPL 29Sep61 "HGC
             Allowed Processes" Class I refers to relatively unskilled HCA/HPA
             graduated or field or staff auditors, etc.  This auditor is
             allowed to audit only a process that he has had success with on
             pcs, regardless of the HGC pcs case requirements.  Class II
             auditors have passed HCO quizzes on E-meter essentials, Model
             Session, sec checking, and tape 6109C26 SHSpec-58 "Teaching the
             Field -- Sec Checks".  They are only allowed to audit sec
             checks.  Class III auditors may audit Routine 3, but not run
             engrams.  Class IV auditors are releases, have had their goal and
             terminal found, and have had engrams run on their goals terminal
             chain and have excellent subjective reality on engrams.  These
             auditors may run Routine 3 and engrams on HGC pcs.]

Unless an auditor has these things, he will get no auditing done.  He'll
either spend all his time setting up cases or, more likely, he will try to
assess a Routine 3D on someone who isn't set up and fall on his head.  He also
needs someone to handle the admin end.  You can easily get pcs with an ad like
"You can always talk to a scientologist about your difficulties." Having
someone doing admin is always a security that the people you help will pay you
for the service.

     It is not really too bad that it takes some skill to apply Routine 3D.
If you let loose a powerful technology which anyone at all could apply, you'd
be in trouble.  Technology that doesn't require a skilled applicator is what
this world mainly suffers from.  For instance, any government official can
push the button on an atomic bomb.  If tech requires no skill, you can't build
an ethic into it.

     The broad program on which we are operating is concise and broad.  We
have central organizations and offices all over Earth which suffer mainly from
lack of technology.  That they will now have.  The policy is to build in
self-reliance within a fixed pattern in the central orgs.  Field auditors have
been attempting to put up a standard and having it collapse.  They generally
don't get as consistently good results as HGC's, which is why HGC's got
started in the first place.  The basic reason for success in the HGC's is the
stiffer discipline there.  The central organization, as long as it is
impoverished and feeling bad, tends to go into games conditions with other
orgs or field auditors.  This is simply because of lack of success.  When
there's scarcity and havingness is low, there's a games condition.  Scarcity is repaired by technical excellence.

     The briefing course was instituted for only one reason: to get the
highest possible level of technology.

     Step 6 would work today, but in fact it didn't work because it was never
done.  In running Step 6, before you had the PC make the object bigger,
smaller, etc., you had to find a null object on the E-meter.  Wherever it
beefed up banks, a null object wasn't found.  Relate it to the GPM -- if you
found an object which quivered on the meter, you would be onto the GPM and you
wouldn't dare to do anything with it.  But you could take something not
related to the GPM and exercise the PC on creating and mocking it up without
antagonizing or messing up particularly the GPM.  The PC with some of the
automaticities of mocking things up off could theoretically have the GPM
evaporate.

                        [Details on running Routine 3D]

     A Q and A puts the withhold in to stay.  When the PC gives you the
withhold, that is all you need.  If it still registers, there's another
withhold.  It's not more on the withhold he has given you.  The reason you
vary the question in sec checking is just to get more withholds, to help the
PC out.  But you always end up by asking the original question to see if it is
cleared.  If you add any new sec check questions, make them pertinent to what
you are doing.

     If a burst of misemotion occurs on a sec check or Class II activity, it
is turned off by what turned it on.  That is true of all secondaries,
particularly of an assessment, running havingness, or a sec check question.
If a withhold turned it on, some withhold is keeping it powered up.  So get
the withhold.  If misemotion is turned on by havingness, you can find out what
is happening if you like, but continue the process that turned it on.  It's a
cruelty to do otherwise, no matter how kind it may seem.  Any other process
you may switch to is so much less powerful than what you have been running
that it won't handle the misemotion.  It takes more of the same.

     The greatest cruelty is being kind to the PC.  It will not help a PC to
omit sec checking him or to rush him into an assessment.  He will never get
through Routine 3D levels if you do.  If you left a sec check question unflat
in one session, don't spend the session getting ruds in.  Flatten the
question.  If the TA has soared meanwhile, find out what has been going on.
If bypassing a PTP upsets the PC, go back to the earlier withhold that
preceded it (It could be some undelivered comm).

     If the session looks confused to the auditor, the PC will get upset.  The
PC is trying to make a session out of it, so he is harder to audit if the
auditor is confused, because the PC reacts to the confusion of the auditor.
An unskilled auditor has much tougher pcs than anybody else.  Then, because it
is all so complicated, the unskilled auditor sees nothing wrong with adding
more complications, so he puts in additives.  The job is to teach people not
to put in lots of useless stuff.  Keep it very simple and they will win.

