6304C18 SHSpec-258 Directive Listing [Part I]

     [Details on running R3M]

     Gobbledygook to comply with the form isn't right.  The PC sometimes gives
it, knowing that it should be such-and-such a form.  Don't use it, since it
will result in no rocket read.  Something odd, but conceptually right, e.g.
"Catholicness", is OK.  It is up to the auditor to direct the PC's attention
to what should be there and get him to find it.

     The liabilities of getting wrong items, wrong goals, missed items, etc.,
are so great that you should do everything possible to prevent these things
from happening.  You have a bank pattern that is at least close to the perfect
pattern.  The upper fourteen to eighteen and the lower twelve items (omitting
the two lowest oppterms, which vary on every goal) are very set and
patterned.  The pattern is that of LRH's fifteenth GPM.  He realized that we
needed the basic fundamentals of the bank, and that the PC was in a bank so
far back and so beefy that it was vital to get its character and its right
pattern, or get killed as a PC.  There is more to the GPM than appeared
earlier, because no one could confront it all until a lot of charge had been
taken off.  The goal of that bank is "to create".  To LRH's amazement, the
pattern holds true later on the track and on other PCs.  If the PC isn't run
closely guided to this pattern, his rocket read goes off.  So the pattern has
value.  There will be other patterns for other types of goals, but they can be
extrapolated from this one.

     Directive listing has to do first with the accuracy of the pattern.  When
the auditor doesn't know what he is trying to do, it is not very successful.
Directive listing is kind; permissive listing wastes time and PCs.

     The main thing that will give you trouble is the top oppterm and the top
terminal.  These are characterized as the final achievement of the goal (the
top oppterm) and the negation of the goal (the top terminal).

