6503C09 SHSpec-54 The New Organizational Structure

     Expansion shows up weaknesses.  It is like turning on a magnifying
glass.

     The problem that a person has, who is not doing well in business, is that
he is being and not doing.  To understand an org, you must understand the
formula of life:  Living is having and following a purpose.  ["Livingness" has
to do with the doingness of life.]

     Here is a further test of an org:  Could you take a central org pattern
and reduce it to city office size [See p. 300, above, for description of what
a city office is.], and have it still work?  If the big pattern doesn't
smoothly reduce, it won't smoothly expand.

     Brief org structure:

     Div 1: Idea.  HCO: Issues data on processing.

     Div 2: Management.  Training and processing services.

     Div 3: Pick up and police.  Collects money and takes care of MEST.

They are interlocked, so they stick together, but:

     Divs 1 & 2 don't organize MEST.

     Divs 2 & 3 don't handle communication.

     Divs 1 & 3 don't train anybody in anything.

     The ED of each board is the assistant ED of another board, higher in the
hierarchy and located elsewhere.  He judges only on statistics.

