6608C02 SHSpec-73 Suppressives and GAE's

     Normally, there is no penalty for a crime of omission.  In this society,
it is being there and communicating that are the crimes that are mostly
punished.  But there are also crimes of omission.  For an auditor, not being
there and not communicating are the highest crimes.

     In the area of tech, we have gone from total change to total no-change.
The materials are all there.  The road to clear, from raw meat to Grade IV, is
very fast.  That is something you can have trouble with is an auditor.  It is
over before you notice.  There is a difference between wog and raw meat.  A
wog isn't even trying.  Some processes are dangerously quick, so they are not
even in the line-up, because they overrun too easily.  R2-12 is one of these.
The route is so fast that only GAE's can prevent someone from going.  [Watch
out!  Here come quickie grades!]

     Every thetan wants out, at least for himself, even the suppressive.  A
suppressive is a special breed of cat.  He is someone with no case gain.  The
SP knows that he belongs in [the soup], so he is sure that you want to put him
in.  An SP could be described as "someone who is always totally surrounded by
Martians, no matter who you are."  As an auditor, he will do nothing but
commit GAE's.  He won't just commit a few.  He won't audit at all.  But he
will say, "See?  I try to audit these guys, and it doesn't work, so it's a
worthless fraud."  He rewards only down statistics.  He goofs up and vilifies
every effort to make people better.

     (The trouble with scientology in South Africa is that they are afraid
that LRH will teach it to Africans!)

     If registrars kept this no-case-gain fact in mind, it would save us lots
of trouble.  We wouldn't try to audit them.  An SP will make no case gain and
can't resist bragging about it.  The registrar could route them to the ethics
officer.  Anyone has the right to complain about one auditor, but not about
all auditors.

     As an auditor, the suppressive is only happy when the PC gets worse, and
he is sad when the PC gets better.  An SP is in a state of constant attack on
scientology.  He commits overts 24 hours a day.  You very seldom find out
about it.  Another characteristic is that he attacks wrong targets.  He
attacks those who are trying to help him.  He will not complete a cycle of
action.  If by chance he does complete one, he will reverse it.  "At no time
during this lecture have I said that all existing governments on the planet
today reward down statistics, choose wrong targets, fail to complete cycles of
action, or commit continuous overts.  I have not said that, and your inference
on that subject is your own responsibility!" An SP believes that "you are
trying to trick him into letting down his protective mechanisms long enough so
that you can "stab him in the back."

     If, as an auditor, you observe all these things and the PC is getting no
case gain, you know that tech is out, because it isn't working.  You, as an
auditor, can be an ethics officer, if need be.  You should know some ethics
tech.  You have to know how to locate overts that are so unreal that they
don't read on a meter.

     The heads of governments are suppressives.  They do commit continuous
overts, and they do the other things that SP's do.  They would get no case
gain if you audited them.  Having them in the driver's seat is a dangerous
situation.  Ethics must be gotten in, not on a police state basis, but on a
very narrow, precise basis.

     The world is also full of PTS people.  They are the ones who cause most
of the trouble, hence the name.  The PC who gets and loses case gain is
roller-coastering.  He has an SP somewhere on his lines, either directly or by
restimulation.  Auditing is fast, but it isn't fast enough to overcome the
SP.  You could take the PTS out of his restimulative environment, audit him up
to Grade V, let him go back to the environment, and he would collapse.  The
reason why the PTS individual roller-coasters is that the suppressive person
or valence will try to destroy him if he makes case gain.  Therefore, don't
audit a PTS.  You may kill him.  A PTS person could make it, however, [if he
made it as far as the clearing course.] Grade VI is the make/break point.  At
Grade VI, you could barely make it in the presence of an SP.  Below this, it
is not possible.

     Another way to handle the PTS individual is to do an S and D to find the
suppressive.  The S and D is an assessment, not auditing.  It is an ethics
action.  Therefore you can't have GAE's during an assessment, because it is
not auditing.  You ought to get the ARC break handled by assessment first,
before doing an S and D.

     What can you do for an SP?  The only known action that will change an SP
is the last power process.  He is the real psycho.  The only place that it can
be done is in an org that has Class VII's who could run it and a registrar who
will throw him out when he comes in complaining of no case gain.  Because
getting him to answer the question could be very difficult.  If you did do
power on him, his next action would be Grade 0 or lower.  But until you have
total control of the environment and padded cells, send him to ethics.  If it
turns out that he has been well audited with no case gain, you are taking your
life in your hands to put him in the HGC.

     An SP got to be one by switching valences.  Man is basically good, but he
mocks up evil valences and gets into them.  An SP is in a false, mocked-up
valence, to which he has earlier assigned or postulated evil purposes or
actions.  Evil is the declaration and postulate that evil can exist, that's
all.  In the absence of such postulates, Man is good.  Scientology would be
very dangerous if that were not true.  The suppressive first mocked up badness
in another, then took on that valence.  The suppressive got in the bad
valence, committed overts, then was attacked by other beings.  He is stuck in
that second incident.  It is far more real than PT.  He is living a
nightmare.  Anybody has a few of these realer-than-real pictures, but when most
of us run into them, we are running back into them.  The SP never left.  You
and I may go back to an incident of trauma, but an SP has never left it.  The
incident is more real to him than PT.  To the SP, all life is the threat of
this incident and the personnel in it.  All life is this incident, and
everyone in PT is one of the attackers.  That is all there is to an SP.  He
continuously commits overts because (he thinks) he is defending himself.  You
could get in this state only if you had lots of overts before it.  This makes
the SP choose wrong targets.  He can't complete cycles of action, because he
is stuck in time.  That is why the last power process works.  A person commits
overts, stacks up the bank until he can't move on the track, then gets the
business.  Institutions contain few SP.  They mostly contain PTS's.

     Power processes can blast the SP loose [from his stuck point on the
track], so that he can then be normally audited.  But how can he be audited
[on power processing in the first place] by someone who is perceived as an
enemy? How can a cop or the Roman Legion audit him?

     Psychiatrists fail to put in ethics on their own profession.  That is
LRH's criticism of them.  LRH's quarrel with governments and politics is the
same.  Any system that permits an evil man to rise to power is a bad system.

     As an auditor, you are only at liberty to handle ethics if you yourself
have clean hands, and if you have certainty that it is not your auditing that
is the cause of no case gain.  You must be satisfied that you don't commit
GAE's before you can accurately spot an ethics problem.  The difference
between a confident and an unconfident auditor is that the unconfident auditor
is one who feels that he may be committing GAE's.

     The benefits of doing TR's are the benefits of the auditing comm cycle
itself, apart from the processes used.  We know that the tech is not
inadequate.  If you omit tech or add to tech, it fails to work.  There was an
additive, until recently.  Auditors were quitting when a TA went low, saying
that the PC could then only be audited on power.  The truth is that a case
that is chronically below 2.0 is in chronic apathy and won't really get over
it until he gets power processing, but he can get gains on grades.

     The easy way to know whether it is your error or the PC's condition that
is causing auditing problems is to know the five GAE's.  Your judgment on an
ethics problem depends entirely on your confidence in avoiding GAE's.  They
are very obvious.  You could detect them on a tape of your auditing.  Be
interested in what is going on with the PC.  Observe how he is doing.  Getting
and keeping a PC in session is under the heading of observing the PC, which
depends on a willingness to confront the PC.

     "[Real] justice can never occur in the absence of an understanding of the
human mind.  Never."  Our justice leaves artificial justice behind it.
Justice is only necessary in an aberrated world or area.

