
SHSBC-304  ren 334 10 Sep 63 Destimulation of a Case

DESTIMULATION OF A CASE

A lecture given on 10 September 1963

[Based on clearsound only.]


Thank you. Well, autumn has come. And you may arrive too,
someday. All right, this is the what? 

Audience: September the 10th. 

Ten September AD 13, Saint Hill Special Briefing Course.

The lecture today concerns service facsimiles, Scientology
III - capital I, capital I, capital I, don't go spelling it
capital Arabic three, because it's not Arabic. It's - use
Arabic numerals to apply to routines. When you're talking
about a body of data, use a Roman numeral. I will clarify
this a little bit better. I've been even - clarification - 
show you I'm getting around to chip into the odd corners of
things, the clarification I've been hitting for recently
has been as low level as fixing up some sample auditor
reports, so that everything's in a proper place on an
auditor report. I mean, things are getting awfully buttoned
up around here.

I'm going to tell you about service facsimiles and how to
find one on a pc, and I'm going to tell you something about
the zones of restimulation in auditing. Otherwise you're
gonna be sitting there in the auditor's chair one of these
fine days and finds yourself with mo' restimulation on your
hands than you could possibly imagine existed.

Now, you don't think you're handling an ARC breaky subject
when you're handling Scientology III, but let me assure
you, when you go in for service facsimiles you are handling
stuff which can bypass more charge than any other single
item there is. For two reasons. One, pc gives you the
service facsimile, you refuse the service facsimile, you
bypass the most vital charge on his case, and of course he
blows his skull off, and you pick bits of bone off the
ceiling for weeks. See, that's all that's necessary. I
don't mean to frighten you, I just mean to terrorize you.

Now I learned most of this stuff the hard way, and you
could probably learn it too, the hard way, but I don't
think we ought to expend one pc to train one auditor, or
something like that. It's too high a cost, let's try to
lead you along the line a little more gently. We expect a
certain amount of auditing casualty, but we don't expect
that casualty to be permanent. And when you are dealing
with a service facsimile, you're handling what makes
aberration "permanent" (quote) (unquote). Nobody's ever
been able to do anything with this before, but it's funny
that a lot of boys have nibbled around the edges. You'll
see Freudian teeth marks around on the edges of the service
facsimile. Hadn't been dented any, but you'll see his teeth
marks.

For instance, it's very interesting how many preclears have
second dynamic service facsimiles. Well, the reason for
this has nothing to do with life. But it merely has to do
with your situation on this planet at this particular time.
I know that sounds absolutely goofy, but the sickness,
incidence of illness and so forth on this planet is
unusually high for planets in this universe, for the
excellent reason that the way to make everybody wrong of
course is obviously to produce nothing. That makes
everybody wrong, makes the government wrong, makes the
between-lives boys wrong, makes everybody wrong, you see.
Because they count on guys going ahead and making bodies
and keeping the civilization wheeling to keep a thetan
interested enough so that he'll keep reporting back through
the - you know, the whole system is based on this.

But that's why the industrialist is in trouble on this
particular planet at this particular time, is because he's
producing. And going on a whole track basis, we find that a
thetan is in trouble simply because of MEST. That's the way
he looks at it, you see. He's in trouble because of MEST
and if he could just have arranged at the outset of all
this never to have created anything, then he wouldn't have
anything now to be in or be in trouble with, don't you see
the reasoning? Quite obvious reasoning, probably quite
valid. So any creative activity is doomed to attack.

You'll find the artists and musicians of this particular
planet always have some schnook alongside of them to cave
them in. They always marry the wrong girl, you know, and
get the wrong agent, and ... Because they're creating. The
industrialist, the manufacturer, that sort of thing, these
boys, it's not because of any deep-seated communist plot,
it's just they are in trouble, that's all. They haven't got
enough force to protect their own creativeness, and as a
result, why, people attack them. Elementary. Basic answer
on the whole track, if you had never had anybody create
anything, you would have no trouble. Nothing had ever been
created, why, of course you wouldn't have any universe to
be in trouble with. This is all very elementary.

And therefore you find a lot of service facsimiles that
have to do with the second dynamic. And herein lies the
difficulty. You take it as a service facsimile, you dust it
off as a service facsimile. You operate as a service
facsimile and you very harshly and tightly keep the itsa
line in this lifetime. You preface any question you're
asking in an assessment, preface any question you are
asking in any list of any kind, preface any question you
are asking as an auditing question with "in this lifetime,"
but severely, and you will get into a minimum amount of
trouble so long as you do one other thing. Now, you see,
that isn't something that's nice to do, that is something
that you will be blowing your brains out one of these days
if you didn't do, you understand? You'll say, "Oh, my God!"
you know, "Oohhhh! Why did I get up this morning?" you
know, because you just didn't use that. See, you didn't
circumscribe the pc's attention line to this lifetime.

So that is the first thing we must know about the service
facsimile. We're engaged upon a key-out. We are not engaged
upon a bank erasure. That's the next thing to know. And of
course that is contingent upon the other fact. If you're
engaged upon a key-out, you'd better damn well stay in this
lifetime. And if you're engaged upon bank erasure of
Scientology IV, well, that's another horse of another hue.
And you certainly had better keep Scientology IV and III
together, and that's the next thing you ought to know.
First, preface everything with "in this lifetime," don't
let the pc's attention skip outside of this lifetime, see.
Just keep it there, man. Because it's going to go.

It goes with the greatest of ease. And this is befraught
with many, many liabilities, because when you're
circumscribing his attention that tightly and you refuse to
let him put his itsa line on something he's just put his
itsa line on, of course you bypass all that charge. Well, I
leave you to worry about that one.

It's a key-out. That's your next thing I've just given you,
it's a key-out procedure, it's not a bank erasure
procedure. You're engaged upon a key-out. And I can tell
you why. And your activities are all guided by the fact
that one little step beyond what you're doing leads you
into the bank. This is a thin-ice activity. If you recognize 
it as anything but a thin-ice activity, sooner or later 
you're going to get into trouble. A thin-ice activity.

The pc, unbeknownst to him, is walking across a thin crust
of ice. And he's liable to go through it any minute, which
is to say, go on to the whole track, swish! Now, the moment
you combine Scientology III with Scientology IV, you're
going to lose. Right now, you're going to lose. You've had
it. Why? Simple. Elementary. You're doing Scientology III
and you find a goal, "Yeah, well, we found this goal, we
might as well run it out. Might as well go back on the
track and run it out." You're now doing Scientology IV.
You're erasing the bank, you're not keying out. You'll be
sorry. You can get away with it, you can get away with it,
but recognize you're no longer making a Clear. And
recognize you probably have not handled the restimulative
factors of the pc you started out to handle, and recognize
that your backtrack is just throwing in more restimulation
on the case.

All right. So how do we get around that? You word every
question as far as possible, since it's not always possible
so that you won't get a goal - word your questions, if you
can, so that you won't get a goal as an answer on your
list. And you avoid all rocket reading items as answers to
your assessments. If it rocket reads, leave it alone.
Because only a GPM rocket reads.

I know this is horrible, this puts you in a terrible
situation. You've now taken the wrong item off the list.
Haven't you? You go down, you null this list of "What's a
safe assumption for coonbats?" Good, you get a nice long
list, safe assumption for coonbats. And you get "tear gas
bombs." See? You get this, and you get that, and you get
the other thing. And you get "to be old." And you're going
down the list, you're nulling this thing, "tear gas bombs"
goes tick, and "to be old" rocket reads. Oh, look at that
service facsimile, man, ho-ho! What a wonderful service
facsimile. Oh, look at it rocket read. Oh, hell, you - the
more you monkey with it, the more you're going to go
sliding into the bank.

Actually, you could get away with running it, in this
lifetime. You could get away with it, and you could key it
out. As long as you don't oppose it, or you don't do
anything to it, or don't run any 3M2, or don't list on it
any further, and handle it very gingerly, and do your
Prepcheck very neatly with "In this lifetime..." on every
Prepcheck question. See, you probably could park it back on
the backtrack, and you might be able to do the pc a lot of
good. And I don't say you can't do it. But you are already
running a pc who was walking on thin ice, you see, and now
you have turned a heat ray loose on the lake, the moment
that you're using this rocket reading item, see? I don't
say it's impossible.

Because you've got two liabilities now. You can take a
wrong item off the list, "tear gas bombs," and run that
with great occasional dissatisfaction of the pc. Or you can
take this other thing, and just act as though you were
prepchecking a goal, but only in this lifetime. See? So you
can get around this. You can get around this. The moment
you do anything else with it, you're running Scientology IV, 
and you're away, and you're no longer doing Scientology III, 
and you're not going to make a Clear, and your ambitions for 
present time restimulation are not going to be reached, and 
you haven't destimulated the pc, you have restimulated the 
pc. And the probable reason that you're doing Scientology 
III in the first place is overrestimulation on the part of 
the pc.

You see this? You see that as a distinct liability? Now
what do you do? What do you do? What is the absolute
textbook answer? You use your judgment. But by God, don't
go back and run that goal, if you're going to stay with it.
You can mark it down as a goal that you have now found for
later reference. You can probably do a lot of things. But
you're - you're in trouble.

So the best answer is to ask questions that don't give you
goals, see. They don't give you goals. The question can't
be answered "to be safe." Question has to be answered in
some other way. Like "safety." Get the idea? You take
a - you take a solution. "Tell me a solution to that item,"
see, that part of existence, or item, or whatever it is,
see. "Tell me a solution." The guy's going to say, "To bip,
and to bap, and to bee and to bet, and to bot and to buk,
and to bow bowt, and uh... Well, you can't do anything
about it, except sit there nervously." But the point I'm
making is, is it doesn't produce actually the best service
facsimile assessment. You want a safe assumption about it,
or a safe assumption for it. Or you want a stable datum
that you would have in regard to it. You're liable to get
goals, but you won't get them with the same frequency.

You say you've got the - you've got the service facsimile
spotted that has something to do with the law, see. And
you've got something like "What is a safe assumption about
the law?" You normally get, "That it will ..." don't you
see? "That it will..." "That it does..." don't you see?
"That everybody is crooked," see? "That cops are no good,"
you know, stuff of this particular character. You say,
"Give me a safe solution to the law."

"To run like hell." "To move." "To get out," see. Oh, boy!
Guy's coming right up with a goals list, see. You don't
want it, see. Service facsimiles are almost never "to..."
almost never "to..." but they could be expressed that way.
But the moment they're expressed that way you're much more
likely to key in a goal. So you're in trouble. Object of
auditing is to get as much done as you can without getting
any - into any more trouble than you have to. Auditing is
not an activity in - where the auditor is always out of
trouble. There is no such thing as a perfect session. There
is no such thing as perfect intensives, where at no time
does the auditor ever get into more hot water than he might
otherwise have done, you see. There's - there's - no pc has
ever run over a long period of time without an ARC break.
Just make up your mind to this, see. First place, it's
almost impossible to bypass charge.

Now, you'll find that skilled Scientology III bypasses much
less charge than unskilled or semi-skilled Scientology IV.
You have a more gorgeous opportunity of colliding with
charges to bypass with Scientology IV than you do with III.
So the thing to do, the obvious solution, is to run III in
such a way as to keep it out of IV.

Now, you should have a very clear-cut idea of what you're
trying to do with Scientology III. Very clear-cut.
Destimulation is its keynote. It is the technology of
destimulation. And therefore, the more that you
restimulate, the wronger you will be. It is possible to be
wronger than wrong. The Aristotelian absolute can be exceeded.

The individual who is being destimulated is having a very
worthwhile activity performed. Possibly, you might not have
too clear-cut an idea why, because I myself just a few weeks 
ago did not really consider it worthwhile until I took apart 
all of its elements, and looked it over very carefully. Now 
I see that it is very worthwhile.

It became necessary to do this in the search for tone arm
action. Tone arm action is very necessary. In auditing, a
great many pcs on the whole track do not get tone arm
action. You can run out GPMs with rocket reads and so
forth, but you don't get tone arm action. And therefore,
this is a very vicious proposition. You're going to
practically kill somebody if you run him three sessions
without tone arm action. You take a pc in a queasy state
and run him two hours without tone arm action, you'll wish
you hadn't. I mean, it's that critical. You want tone arm
action.

Well, tone arm action ceases in the presence of
overrestimulation. So the whole track is too restimulative
to the pc, obviously, if it locks up his tone arm.
Elementary. When tone arm - she stop moving, when tone arm
stop moving, pc's in overrestimulation. If Confucius had
said it he would be a very wise man. That's a stable datum
about tone arm action. If you haven't got tone arm action
on the pc, pc is in a state of overrestimulation.

There is another state that I can point out to you of no
tone arm action, which is simply auditing nothing on the
pc. You can put a pc on the cans and walk off to the other
side of the room and sit down on the chair, and it's very
probable that the TA will not move for hours on end. I just
want to call this to your attention, too. But actually,
that's quite rare since just the mechanics of auditing
shift charge around, controlling the pc's attention upon
himself or his environment will shift charge. So to all
intents and purposes we're left with just one reason - 
providing any auditing is being done at all - we're left 
with just one reason why the tone arm isn't moving. And 
the tone arm isn't moving for the excellent reason the pc's 
in overrestimulation.

Let's take an example of a room. Call tone arm action a
moving person. We have a moving person in this room. Tone
arm action, see. Now we fill the room half full of cotton
bales. We call these cotton bales charge. Notice that this
person moving around in the room can only move half as
much. Because it's half full of cotton bales. Now let's put
the remaining half of the room half full of cotton bales.
Now this moving person, of course, can only move a quarter
as much as he could in the first place and only half as
much as he could just a few minutes ago. Got the idea?

All right, call these cotton bales charge, still, and let's
fill up the room with cotton bales. Our moving person
doesn't move. And a very green, inexperienced auditor who
doesn't know any of this tries thereafter just to get more
cotton bales in the room. That's the hallmark of an
inexperienced auditor. "Tone arm action is reduced, move
more cotton bales in the room. Let's get some more engrams
going, let's get some more GPMs in there. Let's restimulate
a few more present time problems. Let's really shove it to
this guy. We'll get tone arm action sooner or later." Yes,
you will, too. Down. "Well, I finally made a Clear. There
he sits. 3.0 - needle doesn't move at all. He's very calm,
he's very calm; as a matter of fact he never says anything
to anybody. Must be Clear. He went through a period of low
tone arem, but I cured him of that." Well, of course, the 
symptom of all those disorders are - naturally are just the 
theory that if you put more charge in restimulation on the 
case you'll eventually get tone arm action. And I think 
this is the way the psychiatrist works. Medical psychiatrist.

By the way, did you notice that the medico is getting an 
awful beating on the subject? Did you notice, in the Times? 
Medical doctors want nothing to do with mental healing? 
They only had six lectures on the subject and didn't 
understand those. The medical doctor is not competent in 
the field of the mind and moving out of the field of the 
mind. Interesting, isn't it? Round and round the little 
ball goes, and where it stops, God help us. Did you notice 
this propaganda line that's going on? Well, keep an eye on 
it, because we got it going now. We're reducing false data 
out of the society - that they know what they're doing. 
Scientology 0 is at work. We've just developed a new one, 
Scientology 0. The illumination of unknown areas, and false 
data, as a prelude to the introduction to stable data. 
Scientology 0. Interesting.

Well, I bring that up at this time really because it's
interesting, but I could use it as an example of what
you're doing with clearing. You're getting all of the
chronic restimulation off of a case, before you walk ahead
with the case.

Now, what you're doing there is removing a lot of false
nonsense off the case, service facsimiles and that sort of
thing, you're destimulating this lifetime. And if you're
very slippy, and you're very clever, you'll get the wildest
tone arm action you've ever seen on a pc. In Scientology
III, you'll never see tone arm like it, tone arm action
like it in Scientology IV. You start hitting in close to
that thing called a service facsimile, even close to it,
sit out on a border of it someplace, and just start moving
in, man. That needle starts loosening up, and that tone arm
starts moving, and it's wham, wham, wham. An auditor really
has to work to prevent tone arm action in Scientology III.
He has to sit there with both feet braced against the tone
arm to keep it from moving. It's almost impossible not to
get tone arm action, providing you follow its very basic
rules. Very difficult. You don't even have to have the
service facsimile and you can get tone arm action. It's
quite remarkable.

Let's look at this thing, then, called restimulation, since
that's very important to Scientology III, since every case
you will approach is in a state of overrestimulation.
That's all cases you have anything to do with. They're all
overrestimulated.

They walk in off the street, they come in from government
agencies, they come in anyplace and everyplace, they leak
out of the walls from the FDA, you know, out of the
woodwork, come out from underneath the rocks from the
American Medical Association, all these guys are in a state
of overrestimulation. All of them. Thoroughly overrestimulated. 
That's the hallmark and the keynote to their activities and 
conduct. This is why they act the way they do whatever the 
screwball activities that they're exhibiting. However all 
this hangs up, or why, or anything else, they can be said 
to be overrestimulated. And that would be a very accurate 
statement.

Because the way you keep somebody trapped, and the way you
keep somebody sucked into it, is never let him go sit down
on a rock and think it over. You've got to keep kicking him
around, see, you've got to have economic pressures, you
know, you've got to have this, you've got to have that,
you've got to have familial complications, you've got to
have problems, man. You've got to have trouble. You've got
to have "finance." You've got to have banks. You've got to
have currency control. You've got to have things like
income tax, you've got to have rising and lowering costs of
living. You've got to have booms and depressions. Things
have got to be hectic, you understand? This guy's got to be
kept worried. If he's kept worried long enough, and gets
his attention extroverted hard enough and so forth, he will
remain trapped.

The basic mechanism of entrapment of course is not just
being on a pole someplace and trapped, you understand? Or
just being in a body. The complications of entrapment are a
little more broad and a little more complex than
that. They have to do with Professor Utgut, at the local
spinbin - I mean university - who is saying, "The economic
situation is far too complex for normal understanding. But
if you merely keep everybody in want, you will have
economics. Uh - the idea then is to increase demand. Now, if
you sufficiently increase demand, everybody will be afraid
of starving to death, and uh - they will end up in actual
want, and this will keep them from ever thinking a sensible
thought. They will too be - be too busy with the ideas of
survival and the worries and problems of life, and so
forth." Actually, he'd be a very wise man if he spoke
exactly like that, so actually his speech in essence is
shortened to this: "Strive. Confuse. And that's economics.
Now we're going to take up the principle of government.
Uh - artistic harassment is our first subject."

You're - you get into a large protest against this particular
planet, not understanding some of it. You start moving up
scale, you begin to understand some of this. You begin to
understand it as simply an extended act of entrapment. The
thetan wants something out of it. And he thinks there's
some pay. In other words the trap wouldn't run at all,
don't you see, unless the thetan was so busy in it that he
never had time to look at it, you see?

So the idea is that you chase him hard enough, and you
harass him hard enough, you worry him hard enough, why, he
never has an opportunity to sit down and take a look at
anything. So if he never has an opportunity to do that
he'll make a lot of foolish decisions. And these foolish
decisions, you see, are made to hold back foolish
confusions, and the net result of that of course is he's
now in more trouble than he was before. And if he'd made no
decision at all he would have been better off, don't you
see? So it goes from one entrapment to another type of
entrapment, and so forth, in economics.

Just think, just think of being without money for two
weeks. Supposing you had no money of any kind for two
weeks. Well, it's quite fascinating. I mean, as a
principle, because there's really no reason in the world
why you should have any money for two hundred years. What's
money? Money is a course in economics, at the local
university, I guess. It's an idea and a fixation. Some kind
of a representation of something for something. To begin
with, it's a bum itsa. See, the - what is it? Doesn't even
have metal behind it, now, see. Some kind of an idea is
afloat that it's exchanging from tub to tub, and here guys
are going off skyscrapers half a mile tall and everything
else to get a quick buck, you see. Absolutely fascinating.
As a matter of fact you can take a handful of money out and
buy most anybody on this planet. Why? Well, I don't know.
But it sure is confusing! That you can be absolutely sure
of, see. That's - it's pretty doggone confusing. He got the
idea that if he gets enough of this stuff, you see, somehow
or another he'll be free. Well, what the hell was he while
he was getting enough of this stuff, you know? That's silly.

Look this over. You look over socialism, and you recognize
it's far more complex than old capitalism was. Capitalism
was complex enough. There's hardly anything left of it. But
it was plenty complex. But capitalism, there was some time
when you could buy off your debt to the local money lender,
you see? There was a time. You could at least look forward
to a time, you see, hopefully, that there would be a time
when you came out of it. There was a possibility that good
luck and steady application and so forth would eventually
cut this thing off and you'd no longer owe this debt. There
was some hope involved. Well, in socialism, you haven't got
a prayer. See, actually the end product of socialism is
you're not permitted to save any money, so in - somehow or
another you're trying to buy yourself off, in some way, but 
of course you never do get bought off in any way, shape or
form, so there's no end to the amount of involvement in
which you are mixed up. You see what I mean?

So you - what you see is a perfecting system of attention -
shifting. All of these things are. They're attention-fixation, 
attention-dispersal, attention-shifting, all of these various 
things are all part and parcel of keeping somebody tied down.

Now, that isn't just a snide comment. That isn't just a
cynical comment on our modern society, this is an
actual - this is - if you don't have bars on the trap you can
have principles of one kind or another, you see. You can
have political solutions of some kind or another, each one
a little more cockeyed than the last, you see. Now, you
look around and you're in terrible protest about some
things done on this planet, when as a matter of sober fact,
that is what you're - probably what you're supposed to do.
Protest. They are not there in the final analysis because
somebody is stupid; they are there because somebody has been 
very clever. And they have provided a piece of randomity of 
sufficient magnitude to keep somebody consistently 
enturbulated. Thus overrestimulation continuously occurs. 
You have to keep somebody  overrestimulated by keying him 
in and doing various things to him, in life. You see that?

All right, your pc walks into your session, subject to all
these mechanisms of restimulation. There he is, see. And we
call this environmental restimulation. This is all very
elementary, actually, these are sources of overrestimulation.

Now your first area here is his PT environment, see. And we
call this environmental restimulation. That's a source of
restimulation. Here is your pc in-session, see, he's
about - he's right here, coming into session, see. One pc.
And we're looking now at the restimulation, we're looking
at the restimulation to which he is subject. And there's
this environmental restimulation. That's the old lady, the
old lady just flew another snit, you know. And that's - odds
and ends of this particular character, you see. There was a
note on his desk that morning, which has begun, "Dear
Jakes, in view of the fact that we are making less money
than we were before..." and then nobody finished the note.
See? There's a story in the newspaper, you see, "All
workers beyond forty years of age will hereinafter be
reconstituted," see? He wonders what the hell that is.
Shoes are wearing out, and the shoe store no longer sells
that design of shoes, you know? In other words, life is hell.

But it's just continuous little barbed arrows, you see, of
restimulation, you see. Here's restimulation. We call it
"r, e, s," not "R." "R" is "reality." So this is all the
lightning bolts, don't you see, this is all the lightning
bolts that you run out when you say, "Since the last time I
audited you has anything been ...?" You're trying to
flatten that off, see, so that you can audit him. Well, 
you know that is necessary. But these things can get so
continuous that your auditing can become very, very
difficult, see?

And then there's this zone, this zone, here. See, that's
all part of the lightning hitting him, here. Then there's
this zone of action and that is restimulated bank by reason
of service facsimile. So we'll just call this "service fac,
restim" that's hung up here. And actually there's an
interdependency between this first one, environmental
restimulation, and service fac restimulation, are interrelated, 
so we actually can draw a circle around the two of them. He 
wouldn't have PT problems if he didn't have service facs, 
that's the discovery, see?

Nevertheless, we'll call this service fac restimulation,
because there's another type of bank restimulation which he 
is subject to, and that - that he is battling along with here 
- is what has already been restimulated in auditing, see? 
See, so this is past auditing restimulation, see? That's 
what's already been restimulated in auditing and not erased, 
see? We've got to take that into account.

Now, here is your current auditing restimulation. This is
what you're going to restimulate in a session, you see.
This is what you're going to restimulate in session, you
understand, in the way of engrams, and that sort of thing.
See, that's what you're going to restimulate in the
session. Those two things we can group together as a pair.
See, that's what's been restimulated and what you're going
to restimulate, or in the process of restimulation.

There's another one that you might not have paid too much
attention to but which you're fighting with all the time
and I'd better identify it and this is called session
restimulation. Session restimulation is just restimulation
by reason of being audited. See? High, high restimulation
is attendant upon an auditor who is rough, rough, rough,
see? You know, every time you open your mouth to talk, the
auditor says, "No, I meant something else." Keeps the itsa
line cut, and stuff like this, don't you see? Little
accidentals. The better auditor, he'll just get an
occasionally accidental flub, you see? But whatever that
auditing skill is, it still adds up to, see, session
restimulation. Now that's not bank restimulation. See?
That - that's just what's happening in the session to kick
somebody around. You got that?

Now, let's look at another one here. And this is the bank.
Now, you see, that anything coming from this of course has
to come up here to current auditing restim, may kick in
past auditing restim, is being kicked around by session
restim. Got that? Hooks up on this restim, got that? And
actually only can operate from service fac. You look over
that. That's sources and zones of restimulation.

Now, just put it this way. There's obviously several places
from which you get restimulation. There's more ways of
throwing cotton bales in that room.

Now let's go over these ways of throwing cotton bales in
the room. Now there isn't just Scientology IV methods of
restimulate a GPM, see. All right, that's throwing a cotton
bale in the room, but there's also a - some bits and pieces
and sometimes some mighty big cotton bales thrown in the
room by rough auditing, see? So that's a source of
restimulation, see? And then we look at what you're
auditing on the pc here, as past auditing restimulation
which is made up of bank which has been restimulated and
not erased in past session. And that has two divisions, and
what you are currently restimulating, you see, that's your
other zone. And then there's the present time environment
that he's living in and this of course is added to the
other restimulation and then that, however, is kicked in,
cross-restimulation occurs, you see, he's worried, and he's
nervy, so therefore he has more ARC breaks in the session,
don't you see. So it keeps beefing up the session.

Now, all that stuff is interactive. All of those sources of
restimulation are interactive and the only core on which it
sits, in actual fact, that can be touched, short of
knocking out the bank, is the service fac. The service
facsimile is what keeps environmental restimulation
restimulated. It also has a great bearing, you would be
surprised, but it has a great bearing on the amount of
session restimulation which occurs. It has an enormous
bearing, up here, on past auditing restimulation which
hasn't been picked up because, of course, it was blocking
the discharge, you see, the full discharge of everything.
It's going to prevent you from discharging current auditing
restimulation; even though you restimulate it, some of it 
is braked, don't you see, by the service fac. And actually 
his environment is in a shambles all the time because of 
his service facsimiles, see. And so therefore it comes back 
to the service fac.

Now, the most notable thing, which you missed by the way in
the quiz last Friday that was pointed out to you, again,
but the most notable thing about the service facsimile is:
The thetan is doing it - ha-ha. Well, of course in the final
analysis he's mocking up his bank and he's the effect of
his bank too, and you could say that very circuitously, and
at some long, drawn point, yes, he is responsible for
everything that is happening to him, you see. But this is
intimate, direct, and now. He doing it. He's doing it right
now. Right now he's involved in making something and
somebody wrong, and himself right. And he is doing it all
off his own little hatchet and it is just about as
influenced by GPMs, see - it's him keeping that particular
GPM in restimulation. See, he says - he says, "To crack
walnuts, man, that's the way this life's got to go. Ooh.
That'll fix 'em, you know, ho-ho." And there's some GPM
sitting back there, "to crack walnuts," you know. Well, of
course he keeps that in restimulation too, but that isn't
really what's making him crack walnuts, you understand?
He's cracking walnuts because he's decided that cracking
walnuts is the thing to do. You'll find out that before he
got the GPM "to crack walnuts," he was also cracking
walnuts. You understand?

So we've got two different problems here. We've got the
thetan doing it and we've got the accumulation of
experience knocking his head off, see? So we have two
sources of lightning.

Now, to be very plain here about this drawing, you can see
here, you can see here, that all of this stuff, see, all of
this stuff, in combination, makes a very messed-up pc.
Charge. He's got charge here. In fact, you're not really
auditing a pc. You're auditing a live bomb. A live bomb
liberally garnished with firecrackers. And the bomb may not
go off, but you sure get a lot of fire crackers exploding.

Now, I don't want to leave you in the dark about what
restimulation is. How does the auditor restimulate
something? I want to get this in passing here because maybe
if you live long enough you'll learn this. How does an
auditor restimulate something? By putting or letting the
pc's attention go on it. By putting the pc's attention on
it, by letting the pc's attention go onto it. What's "it"?
Actually, any charge, heretofore inert, which can be
rekindled. Or if it has been restimulated already, then
re-restimulated or increased in restimulation. Now that's
very technical. And that sounds very esoteric. And I'm
afraid that has the terrible simplicity of a mud pie
dropping on a sidewalk. It's just about that complicated.

I'm very sure that you at some time or another in a session
have rather wished that you had just cut your throat rather
than come in to audit this particular pc, because you don't
seem to be able to do anything right at all. Everything is
going wrong. And you say therefore it is the pc's trouble.
The pc is causing this trouble. Well, actually, the pc is
totally incapable of causing trouble in a session. The
auditor can sit there like a total knucklehead and let the
pc's attention wander all over the bank, you know, pick up
engram A, engram B, engram C, engram D, engram waaa, so on,
baaaw, baaaw, brr-brr-brr-brr-brr, whooo, whooo. And the
auditor isn't doing a thing. He's just sitting there being
a good listener, see. He was doing everything right, and
all of a sudden the pc exploded in his face, see? Well,
that's just accidental restimulation. You just let the pc
wander. Actually, the pc is wandering under the command of 
his service facsimile. That's what's commanding. He wants 
to make certain zones and areas wrong, and one of the ways 
to make them wrong is to get awful restimulated and collapse. 
I mean, that's usual.

You wouldn't have any such thing as psychosomatic medicine
unless every thetan had the computation - they all do have
the computation - that, well, the best way to handle it is
get sick, in the final analysis. Otherwise, psychosomatic
trauma would never make anybody sick and it makes everybody
sick, so then everybody must have the service facsimile
that the way to handle the situation is to get sick. You
see that? I mean, it's just open and shut because it's the
definition of it, so everybody has the service facsimile of
sickness. You try to run the service facsimile of sickness, 
ordinarily, oh, go ahead and run it, but you limit it to 
this lifetime otherwise you're going to wind up there 
trillions-twenty ago, you see. Because he had that for a 
long time. See, that's old. That - what comes under the 
heading of too much service facsimile, that's almost "pc," 
don't you see? There's some of these things are so 
confoundedly standard that you sometimes wish you hadn't 
started auditing them. You know, they go backtrack too 
quick, too fast. Too upsetting.

All right. Now, this business of restimulation, let's get
back on what this business of restimulation is, this is
very interesting, very easy. And there's nothing much to 
it. If ynu want the pc's attention on a cow, you either
let his attention wander to the cow, or you say "cow." 
I mean, that is how elementary it is. Very many auditors 
don't ever get the idea of how you - how they could
possibly restimulate anything because they overlook the
idea of the simplicity of the mechanism of restimulation.
If you don't want the engram about a cow restimulated,
then you don't say "cow", you get the idea? I mean, it's
that elementary, my dear Watson. You don't want the pc 
on a GPM, so you don't say anything about the GPM and 
that's all. You want his attention on the GPM, you don't 
mention - you mention the GPM. That is all. That's the 
basic thing. It's how many times you mention it, with 
what complexity, that fixes the restimulation and 
increases it. But to start in, all you have to do is 
say, "GPM."

Pc's going on and on, and you're going to be very
agreeable, you see. And the pc's going on and on about this
service facsimile in Scientology III, and he's saying,
"Well - and so on - and - uh - to be goofy, that - that
seems..." "Oh, that must be the goal. Oh, I know, yeah, the
goal we ran the other day on you."

The auditor doesn't look on this for what it is. That's
getting out this twenty-foot pointer, neon-lighted, putting
the pc squarely in front of the bank, taking the pointer
and putting it directly on, says, "put your attention on
that GPM there, square now, son, right there. That's it,
right there, look at it now," get it all restimulated, and
get sparks flying off it. I mean, that - that's all very
fancy, but actually the whole operation is complete, "Oh,
that goal we ran the other day. Yeah, I know." That's all.
That's all - that's all the auditor has to do and he's
restimulated the goal, don't you see. It's too elementary.

Just had an occasion of an auditor trying to find the time
limiter and innocently asking for four engrams on an
overrestimulated pc. You understand? He just said, "Well,
what's the first time you ever had any trouble with that?"
Talking about a physical injury, you see? Four engrams,
bang, bang, bang, bang. Boom. Overrestimulation, bang. ARC
break, boom. Simple. I mean, this is how easy it is to
restimulate somebody.

But you shouldn't be afraid of restimulating somebody
because that's part of the auditor's trade. But just know
what you're doing, for the love of Pete! Know what you're 
doing. You've had four rough sessions with this pc, see. 
You - say, because you want to get on the good side of 
the pc, "Well, I'm sorry we've had such rough sessions 
lately..." There goes four rough sessions! Pc says, "Wha - 
wha - wha - what? Who? Who? Where? Where? What's the matter? 
Who shot me?" You understand? Oh, but you said, "I'm sorry 
we had these rough sessions, lately." So your intention was 
not to restimulate. No, the mechanism of restimulate is simply
name. That's the whole of restimulation. Name. And the more
often you name it, the more it'll restimulate, and that's all.

Now I'll tell you the perfect way to produce an ARC break.
Name it and not permit it to be itsaed. That's all you got
to do, see? You say engram, no itsa, engram, no itsa,
engram, no itsa; ARC break. It - it's terribly fantastically
elementary. And that's actually all there is to a rough
session. It's the auditor naming things, or preventing
itsas of things which are named. And that's all that's
going on, that's all that's going on in a rough session.

The pc is very nervous on the subject of Instructors or
Supervisors, or something like that, he's it - I'm just
talking about a student now. And he's got - he's got twenty
infraction sheets to make up before Sunday, or he doesn't
go up to the next unit, see, and so forth. And
he - eventually you've got him calmed down in the session,
don't you see? Pc's there, and he's finally starting to
look at his own bank, and interested in his own case, and
you're going along, just fine, don't you see, and then you
say, "Uh - I'll have to ask the Instructor." And you say,
this is an ARC breaky pc. No, this is just a blabbermouthed
auditor. You get - you get how it is, see?

So you come back to the thing, all auditors talk too much.
But the sources of ARC break become - come from this, that
is, just - just naming, naming and then not picking up - see,
in some fashion or another, naming and then not picking up
the itsa. See? And then we've ensealed in what restimulation 
is there. If you're not going to pick up the itsa, don't name 
it. And you'll have the - you'll have sessions that are 
absolutely glass-smooth. You'll just be absolutely fascinated. 
You'll never see such cheerful, happy, appreciative pcs. See, 
if you're not going to pick up the itsa, don't name it, man. 
Elementary, my dear student.

There's the whole of smooth auditing. Now, there's another
way to do this. Another way to do this, is let the session,
and the activities of the session, bar the discharge of
materials already restimulated. See, the auditor didn't
name it, but it's been named. From some source or another,
it's been named. And the pc, the pc's sitting there - the
pc's sitting there, and it's been named, and the pc is
saying, itsa-itsa-itsa-itsa-itsa, "Well, is it all right
with you if I start the sess - uh - session now? All right,
is it all right in the room, room's all right - uh - so
forth, the uh - uh - uh - squeeze the cans uh - yes, yes,
uh - pardon me, squeeze the cans again. Hmm. I didn't quite
get that, squeeze the cans again - all right. Now, now,
uh - all right with you if I uh - start - start the session
now, huh? Is it all right with you? Okay, all right. All
right." Gives him a session start, I won't start a session
for you, and - "What goals would you like to set for this
session?" and is absolutely horrified to have, "Well, I
don't really care to set any goals for the session as a
matter of fact." And the auditor says, "What could I
possibly have done?" It's just elementary what he's done,
don't you see? There's a source of restimulation. Now,
auditors very often ask silly questions to be sociable,
right before they start the session. And they get an itsa
line going, and then stop the itsa line by starting the
session. You can actually sit down in any session you've 
had that was a rough one and if you had - particularly if 
you had a tape of it, you could say, "Oh, my God!" You say, 
"How've you been?" Pc says, "Uh - well, all right."

"All right. Is it all right with you if we start the
session now? The room's okay? Uh - chair's all right, is it
all right if we audit in the room?" We get down to goals,
see. "What goals would you like to set for the session?"
"Well, huh! Don't care to set any goals. Well, to live
through the session." This whole thing then is completely
mysterious to the auditor. And the mystery is complete. He
didn't do anything. Hell he didn't! He put an itsa line
in - or he put a whatsit in. Throw the pc a whatsit. I know
an auditor who has a rough time all the time ending sessions.
Always puts a whatsit in at the end of the session. Then 
never lets it be itsaed, and then gets an explosion. Do you 
understand this? See, this is - this is elementary. This is 
all there is to an ARC breaky session.

Well, let's take a look at this, now, and we see then that
the auditor is in control, to a very marked degree, of
what's restimulated.

But on an uncleared pc, the service fac is interacting with
the existing restimulation so the pc is actually putting in
a continuous restimulative factor in sessions. And you get
restimulation trouble as long as the pc has a prominent
service facsimile. Now if you add, then, to this bank, we
go back to this one - if you add now, if you add in
restimulation - all this is in place, see.  And you add in 
some restimulation from down here, to here, see. Mathematics 
of the situation! There's fifty ergs of energy in 
overrestimulation on the case right now. So you pull in a 
GPM from the bank which contains another fifty ergs of
restimulation, you now have a hundred ergs - capacity of
the pc for easy handling is probably ten ergs to begin with. 
So you're now auditing on an overrestimulation factor of 
about ten to one and you sit around and you say, "Well why 
doesn't the tone arm action move? Why - why don't we get 
tone arm action here? Why - you know? What's the matter with 
the tone arm? Well, maybe we're running the wrong GPM, uh - 
do you suppose we're running the wrong GPM here, pc?" Uhh! 
What's the pc going to do? He's going to look at each GPM 
that he's had anywhere around, see? He's just picking up 
them cotton bales, you know, and shoving them into that 
room and that tone arm just locks up harder and harder, 
freezes more and more and drifts lower, and so forth. You 
see the exact mechanism in progress?

So it's actually very, very much to your benefit to get rid
of the service facsimile, at least out of this lifetime and
the auditing environment. Because then we can possibly get
rid of this, service facsimile hangs up that - past auditing
restimulation. You're not restimulating anything very much
on current auditing restimulation if you're being very
clever in handling the service facs, so we maybe cut out
half of that. We cut session restimulation down to, very
small thing, because we can be incautious with our speech
without restimulating all this stuff that's already live.
Do you see the benefits of all this?

All right. Well, see that and see as well that it's pretty
adroit business finding a service fac without kicking
everything else in. Do you see what you're trying to do?
Audit smoothly, of course, that's the solution to your
session restimulation. Restimulate no more in your current
auditing, don't start naming a bunch of things, see. Don't
start pulling up a bunch of things. As far as past
auditing, give the pc frequent Prepchecks, you know, "on
auditing" Prepchecks. Every fifth, sixth session, you can
keep that cut back, you see. Present time environment.
Don't audit the guy one hour every three weeks and expect
him to hold his own. Actually, do you know that two and a
half hours a week is really not quite enough to hold down
environmental restimulation on most cases. Which is
interesting.

So we can cut these various things down. We can get the pc
in a less restimulative environment - the way you would, by
the way, handle the insane or the severely neurotic. You'd
simply put him in an unrestimulative environment and be
very, very careful that the sessions you gave him were
totally lacking in restimulation. All the restimulation
that's necessary to the auditing of this case has been done
for a long time. You don't have to - you actually don't have
to restimulate much else. It's all in restimulation.

You can do these various tricks to cut down the
restimulation on your pc. You actually should remember this
graph here, these zones of restimulation are things that
can restimulate the pc, because you could sit down with the
pc and you could simply say, "We're going to audit this
bird and he's having a hard time. Well, now, what would be
practical to cut out?" Normally the auditor's responsibility 
simply goes into trying to reduce the auditing restimulation. 
Because they're trying to reduce it they very often goof. 
I mean, they overdo the job, you know. Get nervous and won't 
interrupt the pc and they're afraid to cut the pc's itsa 
line and let the pc wander into all kinds of things, you 
know. They don't provide good specific small targets in 
auditing to center the pc's attention on them and clean 
them up. They're always taking a bit bigger target than 
the pc can grab hold of and that sort of thing.

In other words, there's various things you can monitor and
that's mostly what we study. The various things you can do
in auditing. But look. Look, that's one out of one, two,
three, four - see, that's one out of five. And you could
actually sit down with this little chart, and subdivide it.
You could subdivide that present time environment
restimulation over there into about at least eight
different categories. You could just break them down into
the dynamics. You sometimes have to do this.

We had somebody one time that used to go home every night
after the auditing session and go through a bunch of voodoo
exercises. I think it was voodoo or some such practice. And
I think he was repeating over the words of a half a dozen
GPMs simultaneously or something like that. Actually, the
way we took the case apart was simply the auditing
supervi- well, Mary Sue, just told him, "Hey! You're doing
so-and-so and so-and-so. You quit that." And he quit that,
and we made some case progress. See, that's just reducing
that. You could take his present time environment, in other
words, and you could compartment it into various sections
and zones of restimulation, don't you see. You know, his
job, and his family, and so forth.

"While I'm auditing you ..." we notice that he always has a
present time problem about the wife, and he has a present
time problem about this, and present time problem about 
that "... take a week's vacation and don't live at home."
See? You've actually reduced that much current restimulation,
maybe you can get some progress with the case, see.  That's -
that's the crux of a lot of these things. But you could 
actually take that chart and find out what you are going to 
cut down.

Now, of course the responsible agency here that's going to
give you the most trouble is the service facsimile. Because
that's what he is holding in restimulation to make people
wrong, and he's liable to make you wrong.

It's very interesting, occasionally I'm trying to make some
student right with auditing, trying to give some auditor a
win, and the auditor will go bzzzz, in some fashion or another
try to make me wrong on an auditing instruction or something
like this, by just not applying it, or crossing it up wrong, 
don't you see. Therefore, trying to create a rightness is 
debarred by the - by somebody's service fac getting in the 
road.

Now you see, that even comes true then on the supervision
of auditors. That's rare, but occasional, don't you see. It
just doesn't work somehow. It doesn't happen very often.
It's usually inadvertent, and it's always easily explained.
Like they didn't quite receive the despatch, or they didn't
understand the despatch. Or they told the pc all about the
direction before it was done or something wild happened
with regard to this auditing direction, you see. Or it all
turned off too quickly so that we couldn't go on auditing
it or something, you see. A little goofy point. It's all
explainable. But you recognize, if you look through it, and
you were to rehearse the service facsimile of that
particular auditor and so forth, if this was a consistent
occurrence, if that occurrence was very consistent, what
we'd have to do of course is find out the mechanism he's
using to try to make somebody wrong. Now that would
there - would therefore bring about a kickback.

Now, he apparently consciously doesn't know what he's
doing. You understand? And there's several ways of handling
that. You can simply bring it sharply to his attention that
something is operating here that is preventing something
from happening, and usually, why, he'll take a look at it
and laugh and straighten it out. That's normally what would
normally happen. You can engage upon some duress or
something like that. As I've said I've been known to put a
head on a pike just to make everybody follow my
instructions for a little while. Just did it, as a matter
of fact. And their heads are still on their shoulders; it
wasn't very vicious, but it was to their attention that a
little more attention could be put on this particular point.

Now, what are you going to get out of something like this?
Well, you'll get less restimulation for the pc. One of the
things that's going to happen, they'll be a little bit more
careful. You get less restimulation for the pc. Of course,
you're liable to get more restimulation on the part of the
auditor so he doesn't follow the instructions any better.
And all of this randomity simply occurs because of a
service facsimile. Now, one of the reasons why the auditor
goofs, and the four guys I just shot down in flames will be
rehabilitated in a short while - were shot down, actually
had this as part of its element.

They were auditing toward the service fac, therefore the pc
was trying to make them wrong. You understand? So you can
count on this occurring as you move toward the service fac.
If you do anything inadvertent - no in - the tiniest little
goofs that don't amount to a hill of beans and you're just
approaching a service facsimile, then the pc targets you as
the one to be made wrong. You get this? And I'd say, in
all - these four students I was just snarling at - that that
had occurred, you see, to some degree.

In other words, the auditor was already enturbulated by
this situation. All right. Now an enturbulated auditor, an
enturbulated auditor, has to be given a new stable datum to
some degree, so just do it - do it - do it, is the best
stable datum that you can give him. Offhand, let him get a
win. Let him see the breadth and understanding of this
particular zone, exactly how this thing is operating and
let him sit back and take a look at it, because obviously
that pc must be very restimulative to the auditor or he
wouldn't be as - so adventurous as not to follow one of my
instructions. Get the idea?

So one of the ways you can do it, one of the ways you can
do it, is shift auditors. See, you get a new pattern of
make-wrongness from the pc, don't you see? And the
auditor's wits can settle down on the situation, don't you
see? And then you apprise the auditor one way or the other,
something for him to look at with regard to all this, see. 
It'll straighten out. Well now, that's a method of handling 
it. But it's all handled on the basis of restimulation.

Now, if you make a practice of handling all of your
auditing actions on a basis of restimulation, your
adjudications and judgment with regard to your auditing
sessions and your pcs and so forth, on the basis of
restimulation, you will seldom be very wrong. Even a poor
solution, based on lessening restimulation, is better than
some heroic solution, like shoot the pc, you know, like
they do in the medical profession, see? Any solution that
reduces restimulation, even if badly put into effect, very
often delivers the goods. Any pc that is running badly
then - now get this one, because this is pretty sweeping,
and I'll be lecturing again on the service facsimile of
course, we will take it up, exactly how you do this. But
all this is a very necessary prelude to this sort of thing.

Any pc, and anything wrong with that pc, is there because
of overrestimulation. And any resolution of the auditing
situation or the case has to take into account a reduction
of restimulation, whether by discharge or destimulation.
One or the other. You key it out, to destimulate, and you
just blow it, of course, to discharge it.

Now, of course, you've got a room full of cotton bales,
you're not going to get anybody moving around in there,
it - there's so many cotton bales in the room, don't you
see, the guy can't move around to throw the cotton bales
out. So that's it. You're not going to get any - you're never
going to empty the room. But you can still look in other
directions to reduce the restimulation. I've just given you
a map of them. You could actually audit, particularly
amongst the neurotic and so forth, simply on a basis of
giving advice against that little chart I just drew for
you. Just destimulate the person's life somewhat, and the
person will recover from some of the most amazing things.
It isn't esoteric at all, see.

Something in his vicinity is naming things that go into
restimulation, that's all. What is restimulation? A
restimulative environment simply contains things in it
which put his attention on things which are in the bank,
and restimulative. I mean, it's as easy as that. He's got
a - he's got a naming environment. And remember that with
his service facsimile, he's doing some naming too. So the
service facsimile is naming a bunch of things to go into
restimulation. See?

So if you reduced the other sources of restimulation, of
which you have five there, and if you reduced - if you
reduced the session restimulation, your current auditing
restimulation, what you're auditing, your past auditing
restimulation; you reduced your environmental restimulation
on the pc, reduced all those things, you see - in the - the
various ways you have of reducing these things, you see,
and then audited out the guy's service fac - even though
this took quite a while to accomplish on reducing these -
well, reducing environmental restimulation: Let's have the
guy go live in the hills for a year before we audit him,
you get the idea? You know, simple as that. Have the guy
get a - some kind of a very calm job of some kind or
another.

It - no matter how bad his case was, don't you see, we -
it's all solved on the basis of reducing restimulation.
And now we take his service fac, and we approach it
head-on, and we audit out the service facsimiles, which
he is in, for one lifetime, and get ourselves a nice
free swinging needle and we give ourselves a nice
behaving tone arm.

And then we go at a very - we've got - accomplished all
that - we of course have now set up practically an
unrestimulative environment, auditing situation, bank and 
so forth. So we can naturally then reach into the bank at 
this point and pick up the string of almost anything in 
the bank, because you've just got a basic map of the bank. 
I mean, you got - say, "All right, let's get the goal 'to 
be dead,' you know, first goal of the Helatrobus Implants," 
and for the next month or so, why, just audit out the 
Helatrobus Implants. You can audit them all out with good 
TA. Particularly if you give an occasional Prepcheck that 
cuts down the past auditing restimulation and cuts down 
your accumulated session restimulation, see. The guy's 
going to make it.

And that's any case, see, that's any case, that makes any
case an easy running case. Now, a case is as hard to run as
it is restimulated. It's as hard to run as it comes to you
restimulated and as hard as you have restimulated it
improperly, see. That - that's as hard - that's how hard is a
case to run. The case is no harder than that to run. A case
is as difficult as it is restimulated.

And you get some guy walking in, his hair's wild, and he
says, "The world is coming to an end tomorrow night!" you
know, and watch out, "I've got to get rid of these bugs,"
you know. Aw, don't pay - no reason to put any attention on
the case. What do you know? Something right away you know.
Case is overrestimulated, naturally. He's gonna sit in that
auditing chair and pick up the cans and answer sensible
questions about his service facsimile in his life? Well, I
don't know, you might be able to get him into session. Get
him to tell you about world's coming to an end - if you kept
him in this lifetime, carefully controlled his itsa line.
You might surprise yourself, you might get a lot of tone
arm action. He might be quite auditable. But the chances
are he wouldn't be. The chances are you're not even going
to get him near an auditing session and if you did, the
auditing would produce no tone arm action.

Actually you know about it, that he's got a stuck tone arm.
In he walked, what's his tone arm condition? Must be the
same as for any overrestimulated case. Stuck. So how can
you approach or attack the case? Well, of course you're
validly auditing the case to the degree that you reduce
restimulation on the case. So there's probably a lot of
ways, looking at this little chart up here, that you reduce
the restimulation on the case, see. A lot of odds and ends.
He knows - he knows psychotherapy; he's had electric shocks
and that sort of thing, see. You can develop a whole bag of
tricks just out of that fact, see? You destimulate
psychotherapy. See, you sit there, you don't say anything.
You don't do anything. See? Don't do anything. When he
leaves, you say, "All right, thank you, thank you, Joe."
He'll finally get pretty calm around you.

Well, that isn't - doesn't look like auditing to you, but
actually it's destimulation. Compare this with "Prepare
Number 62 for electric shock and a prefrontal lobotomy in
the morning. Hrrmph hrrmph we've got to cure him! Ah,
ha-ha. Get the wet packs, the cold packs, the green packs,
the purple packs and the ice packs. Oh, yes, we've got to
fix him, rouse him up, rouse him up, yep, yep, yep." Looks
to me like these characters are adding more environmental
restimulation than they can pick up so, of course, they
have a lousy record of cure. In fact, they all carefully
explain to you how insanity is incurable. It may or may not
be incurable, but is it, that's the main thing. Is
insanity? And the answer of course is no.

The - there is however an overrestimulated pc. There is an
overrestimulated being. So if you look into all this very
carefully, you'll see that you can cut back restimulation
all over the place. And you get all hepped up on the
subject of all you've got to do is get your E-meter and put
the guy on it, and find the service facsimile and run right
and wrong on it, and that sort of thing, and so forth,
you're going to lose. That - that's fine. That's fine.

Develop confidence in this particular direction. But you
realize, there are going to be a lot of people who can't
sit in a chair and can't pick up an E-Meter. People that
are unconscious; well, you can bring them conscious by
running Touch Assist sort of thing on the sheets.

But he can't talk to you, he's afraid of you, he can't sit
down in the chair, he this, he that, see, all these other
things.

Well, actually, it's the same problems you have in
auditing. It's a problem in destimulation, or discharge of
existing restimulation, it's one or the other. And normally
you'd select out destimulation by simply decreasing the
restimulation of the various zones from which he can get
restimulation. You'd select those out very carefully,
measure them up and give somebody some advice on the
subject of it and his restimulation would reduce. The next
thing you know, "Miracle worker in the field of the mind,"
you know, and people will say he doesn't do anything. "We
don't understand, we don't understand how Doctor Jones gets
results, because all he does is sit there and nod and the
patients come in and nod when they leave, and they seem to
get well. Must be some tremendous personality that he has,"
you see. We've reduced treatment restimulation, you see. He
didn't even pick up a pad and issue any orders, see.

Now, if you can digest all that that I've just been talking
to you about, and you've got all of that taped, and you've
got everything I've been talking to you about absolutely
taped, we can approach the subject of a service facsimile,
which we will do in a later lecture.

Thank you very much.

[end of tape.]

============


